Hyunsoo Jeon1, Chongze Wang1, Seho Yi1, Jun-Hyung Cho2. 1. Department of Physics, Research Institute for Natural Science, and Institute for High Pressure at Hanyang University, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-ku, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physics, Research Institute for Natural Science, and Institute for High Pressure at Hanyang University, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-ku, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea. chojh@hanyang.ac.kr.
Abstract
The rare-earth metal hydrides with clathrate structures have been highly attractive because of their promising high-[Formula: see text] superconductivity at high pressure. Recently, cerium hydride [Formula: see text] composed of Ce-encapsulated clathrate H cages was synthesized at much lower pressures of 80-100 GPa, compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides such as [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Based on density-functional theory calculations, we find that the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, while a transfer of electrons occurs from Ce to H atoms. Further, we reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in the chemical precompression of clathrate H cages. Our findings not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also have important implications for understanding the origin of enhanced chemical precompression that results in the lower pressures required for the synthesis of [Formula: see text].
The rare-earth metal hydrides with clathrate structures have been highly attractive because of their promising high-[Formula: see text] superconductivity at high pressure. Recently, cerium hydride [Formula: see text] composed of Ce-encapsulated clathrate H cages was synthesized at much lower pressures of 80-100 GPa, compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides such as [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Based on density-functional theory calculations, we find that the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, while a transfer of electrons occurs from Ce to H atoms. Further, we reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in the chemical precompression of clathrate H cages. Our findings not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also have important implications for understanding the origin of enhanced chemical precompression that results in the lower pressures required for the synthesis of [Formula: see text].
In recent years, rare-earth metal hydrides have attracted much attention due to the possibility of their realization of room-temperature superconductivity (SC)[1-8]. First-principles density-functional theory (DFT) calculations together with the Migdal–Eliashberg formalism have predicted that rare-earth metal hydrides such as yttrium, lanthanum, cerium hydrides host high- SC at megabar pressures[9,10], the origin of which is based on phonon-mediated electron pairing[11]. Subsequently, such a conventional SC of was experimentally observed with a superconducting transition temperature of 250–260 K at a pressure of 170 GPa[3,4]. This record of has been the highest temperature so far among experimentally available superconducting materials including cuprates[12,13] and Fe-based superconductors[14,15]. Therefore, the experimental realization of room-temperature SC in has stimulated interests of the high- community towards compressed metal hydrides under high pressure[16-23].However, since the synthesis of was performed at 170 GPa[3,4], it has been quite demanding to discover H-rich rare-earth hydrides synthesized at a moderate pressure below 100 GPa, which is easily and routinely achievable in the diamond anvil cell (DAC)[24,25]. Motivated by the first theoretical prediction[9] of cerium hydride with a clathrate hydrogen cage structure, two experimental groups[5,6] achieved its successful synthesis at a lower pressure of 80–100 GPa. X-ray diffraction measurements and DFT calculations[5,6] confirmed the previously predicted[9] crystal structure of , which adopts a hexagonal clathrate structure with the space group P6/mmc. Here, each Ce atom is surrounded by the cage consisting of 29 H atoms (see Fig. 1a). It is remarkable that the H–H bond lengths in are close to those of solid metallic hydrogen that can be produced at high pressure above 400 GPa[26-29]. Therefore, the discovery of having clathrate hydrogen networks suggests that the metallic state of solid hydrogen can be attained at relatively lower pressures by using binary hydrides with f-electron metals. It is noteworthy that the sizable reduction of H–H bond lengths in reflects the presence of a larger chemical precompression[30-32] compared to other rare-earth metal hydrides such as and [9,10,33-37]. However, the underlying mechanism of how the pressure required for the synthesis of is much reduced is yet to be identified.
Figure 1
(a) Optimized structure of at 100 GPa and (b) hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) lattice of Ce atoms. Three different species of H atoms, , , and , exist in cage. The isolated cage surrounding a Ce atom is displayed in (c), together with its constituent parts, i.e., six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings.
(a) Optimized structure of at 100 GPa and (b) hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) lattice of Ce atoms. Three different species of H atoms, , , and , exist in cage. The isolated cage surrounding a Ce atom is displayed in (c), together with its constituent parts, i.e., six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings.In this paper, we investigate the electronic structure and bonding properties of at high pressure using first-principles DFT calculations with the inclusion of Hubbard on-site Coulomb interaction. The calculated band structure of shows a strong hybridization of the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states with the H 1s state. We reveal that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons contributes to yield a much larger chemical precompression of clathrate cages along the c axis than in the a–b plane. Despite a strong hybridization between the Ce- and H-derived electronic states, our Bader charge analysis shows a charge transfer from Ce to H atoms, thereby suggesting that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and cages features the mixed ionic and covalent bonding. The present results provide new insight into understanding the underlying mechanism of the chemical precompression that requires relatively lower pressures for the synthesis of [5,6], compared to other experimentally synthesized rare-earth hydrides [3,4] and [7,8].
Results and discussion
Calculated total charge density of (a)
and (b) isolated cages. The saddle points of charge densities between Ce and // atoms are marked “” in (a). The charge densities in (a) and (b) are plotted on the (110) plane with the contour spacings of 0.07 e/Å. The charge density difference (defined in the text) is displayed in (c), with the contour spacing of 0.03 e/Å. The Bader basins of Ce and H atoms are displayed in (d).(a) Calculated band structure of together with the LDOS for Ce and H atoms. The energy zero represents . The PDOS of is also given in (b).We begin by optimizing the structure of using the PBE + U calculation. Figure 1a shows the optimized structure of at a pressure of 100 GPa, which is the same pressure employed in previous DAC experiments[5,6]. Here, Ce atoms form a hcp lattice (see Fig. 1b) with the lattice constants Å and Å, in good agreement with the experimental[5,6] data of Å and Å. Meanwhile, the cage surrounding a Ce atom is constituted by six tetragon rings, six pentagon rings, and six hexagon rings (see Fig. 1c). Note that there are three species of H atoms [termed , , and in Fig. 1a composing the cage. We find that the , , , and bond lengths are 1.190, 1.486, 1.275, and 1.065 Å, respectively. These H–H bond lengths in are close to those (0.98 and 1.21 Å) predicted from metallic hydrogen at 500 GPa[28]. It is thus likely that the synthesized[5,6] binary compound with the clathrate cages is able to generate H networks comparable to metallic hydrogen even at a low pressure of 100 GPa.Figure 2a shows the calculated total charge density of . It is seen that H atoms in the cage are bonded to each other with covalent-like bonding. Here, the charge densities of H–H and Ce–H bonds exhibit the saddle-point characters at their midpoints, similar to that of the C–C covalent bond in diamond[38]. As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplementary information, the calculated electron localization function also shows the covalent-like H–H and Ce–H bonds. The charge densities at the midpoints of the , , and bonds are 0.39, 0.56, and 0.85 e/Å, respectively. These values in are larger than the corresponding ones (0.32, 0.45, and 0.76 e/Å in Fig. 2b) obtained from the isolated cages whose structure is taken from the optimized structure of . This result implies that the H–H covalent bonds in are strengthened by a charge transfer from Ce to H atoms. Interestingly, the electrical charges of Ce and H atoms are connected to each other, reflecting a covalent-like bonding character. It is noteworthy that the charge densities at the points marked “” (in Fig. 2a) between Ce and // atoms are close to that at the midpoint of the bond. This covalent nature of Ce–H bonds is attributed to a strong hybridization between the Ce and H electronic states, as discussed below.
Figure 2
Calculated total charge density of (a)
and (b) isolated cages. The saddle points of charge densities between Ce and // atoms are marked “” in (a). The charge densities in (a) and (b) are plotted on the (110) plane with the contour spacings of 0.07 e/Å. The charge density difference (defined in the text) is displayed in (c), with the contour spacing of 0.03 e/Å. The Bader basins of Ce and H atoms are displayed in (d).
(a) Calculated lattice constants of as a function of pressure using the f-valence scheme, in comparison with those obtained using the f-core scheme and experiment[5]. The resulting c/a ratios as a function of pressure are also given in (b).To examine the charge transfer between Ce to H atoms, we calculate the charge density difference, defined as = − − , where and represent the charge densities of the isolated Ce lattice (Fig. 1b) and the isolated cages (Fig. 2b), respectively. As shown in Fig. 2c, illustrates how electronic charge is transferred from Ce to H atoms. It is seen that the charge transfer occurs mostly from Ce to and . Meanwhile, the charge transfer from Ce to is minor. We further calculate the Bader charges[39] of to estimate the number of transferred electrons between Ce and H atoms. Figure 2d shows the Bader basins of the constituent atoms, obtained from the gradient of [39]. We find that the calculated Bader charges of Ce, , , and basins are (including the semicore electrons), , , and , respectively. Thus, we can say that Ce atoms lose electrons of 2.53e per atom, while , , and atoms gain electrons of 0.34e, 0.31e, 0.09e per atom, respectively.In Fig. 3a, we display the calculated band structure of , together with the local density of states (LDOS) for Ce and H atoms. The narrow bands located at 2 eV above originate from Ce 4f electrons, while those located at around −20 eV below are associated with Ce 5p semicore electrons. It is noticeable that the LDOS shape of Ce atoms is very similar to that of H atoms in the energy range between −15 eV and , indicating a strong hybridization between Ce and H electronic states. In order to resolve the orbital characters of electronic states, we plot the partial density of states (PDOS) projected onto the Ce 5p-semicore and 4f/5d-valence states and the H 1s state in Fig. 3b. We find that the Ce 5p-semicore states are extended upward to reach up to , while the 4f- and 5d-valence states are distributed downward to about −10 and −13 eV below , respectively. Hence, these delocalized semicore and valence states hybridize well with the H 1s state. Such a strong hybridization between Ce and H electrons is likely associated with the Ce-encapsulated spherical H-cage structure of . Consequently, the electron charges of Ce and H atoms show covalent characteristics between the Ce and // atoms (see the “” points in Fig. 2a). Based on this covalent feature of the Ce–H bonds and the charge transfer from Ce to H atoms, we can say that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms to cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent.
Figure 3
(a) Calculated band structure of together with the LDOS for Ce and H atoms. The energy zero represents . The PDOS of is also given in (b).
As mentioned above, the synthesis of requires much lower pressures 80–100 GPa[5,6] compared to that (170 GPa) for the synthesis of [3,4], indicating the variation of chemical precompression with respect to the occupation of f electrons. Here, we note that Ce atom with the electron configuration [Xe]456 has one 4f electron, while La atom with [Xe]56 represents no occupation of f orbitals. It is thus expected that the lower synthesis pressure of would be caused by the presence of the delocalized Ce 4f states (see Fig. 3b). To confirm how the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons contributes to the chemical precompression of cages, we optimize the structure of as a function of pressure using the f-core scheme, where Ce 4f electrons are considered as core electrons. Therefore, the interactions of 4f electrons with valence electrons are completely removed to simulate the localized nature of 4f electrons[40]. The band structure and PDOS of calculated using the f-core scheme are displayed in Fig. S2. We find that the band dispersions of the Ce 5d and H 1s states change largely around because their hybridizations with the Ce 4f states are avoided in the f-core scheme. In Fig. 4a, the lattice parameters computed using the f-core scheme are compared with those of the f-valence scheme as well as the experimental data[5]. We find that in the pressure range between 100 and 160 GPa, both the f-core and f-valence schemes predict similar values for a and b, close to the experimental values[5]. However, the f-core scheme predicts larger c values than the f-valence scheme and experiment[5] by 6% in the same pressure range. As a result, in contrast to both the f-valence scheme and experiment[5], the f-core scheme gives relatively larger values of the c/a ratio between 100 and 160 GPa (see Fig. 4b). These results indicate that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons plays an important role in determining the chemical precompression along the c axis, while it hardly affects the chemical precompression in the a–b plane.
Figure 4
(a) Calculated lattice constants of as a function of pressure using the f-valence scheme, in comparison with those obtained using the f-core scheme and experiment[5]. The resulting c/a ratios as a function of pressure are also given in (b).
In order to check whether the localized/delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons influences the dynamical stability of , we calculate the phonon spectrum at 100 GPa using both the f-core and f-valence schemes. The calculated phonon spectrum of the f-core scheme exhibits imaginary frequencies in the whole Brillouin zone [see Fig. S3(a) in the Supplementary information], indicating that is dynamically unstable. On the other hand, the f-valence scheme shows that is dynamically stable without any imaginary-frequency phonon mode [see Fig. S3(b)]. Therefore, we can say that the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons is necessary for stabilizing the clathrate structure of .
Conclusion
Our first-principles DFT + U calculations for have shown that (i) the Ce 5p semicore and 4f/5d valence states strongly hybridize with the H 1s state, (ii) the charge transfer occurs mostly from Ce to and atoms, and (iii) the delocalized nature of Ce 4f electrons is an essential ingredient in the chemical precompression of clathrate cages. The present results not only suggest that the bonding nature between the Ce atoms and H cages is characterized as a mixture of ionic and covalent, but also provide an explanation for the enhanced chemical precompression in . We thus proposed that the large chemical precompression of H-rich clathrate structures can be attained in rare-earth hydrides with delocalized 4f electrons. It is noteworthy that, according to DFT calculations, [16] with clathrate H cages begins to destabilize at a pressure below about 100 GPa, which is relatively lower than that (226 GPa) of [36]. These different destabilization pressures of and are likely to reflect the variation of chemical precompression, due to the influence of delocalized f electrons. Indeed, was experimentally synthesized at a pressure of 100 GPa[16]. We also note that containing no f electrons begins to destabilize at a pressure below 72 GPa, which is much lower than that (226 GPa) of [36]. Here, the different stabilization pressures of and were explained[36] in terms of the size of Y atom: i.e., having denser, larger hydrogen cages with shorter H–H distances requires a higher stabilization pressure.
Methods
Our DFT calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package with the projector-augmented wave method[41-43]. For the exchange-correlation energy, we employed the generalized-gradient approximation functional of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)[44]. The 55 semicore electrons of Ce atom were included in the electronic-structure calculations. For Ce 4f electrons, we considered the effective on-site Coulomb interaction of (=U) = 4 eV, where the Hubbard parameter U is 4.5 eV and the exchange interaction parameter J is 0.5 eV[5]. A plane-wave basis was used with a kinetic energy cutoff of 1000 eV. The -space integration was done with 12128 k points for the structure optimization and 242416 k points for the DOS calculation. All atoms were allowed to relax along the calculated forces until all the residual force components were less than 0.005 eV/Å. Phonon calculations were preformed by a finite displacement method with the PHONOPY code[45].Supplementary information.
Authors: Hanyu Liu; Ivan I Naumov; Roald Hoffmann; N W Ashcroft; Russell J Hemley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ji Feng; Wojciech Grochala; Tomasz Jaroń; Roald Hoffmann; Aitor Bergara; N W Ashcroft Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Maddury Somayazulu; Muhtar Ahart; Ajay K Mishra; Zachary M Geballe; Maria Baldini; Yue Meng; Viktor V Struzhkin; Russell J Hemley Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Ion Errea; Francesco Belli; Lorenzo Monacelli; Antonio Sanna; Takashi Koretsune; Terumasa Tadano; Raffaello Bianco; Matteo Calandra; Ryotaro Arita; Francesco Mauri; José A Flores-Livas Journal: Nature Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nilesh P Salke; M Mahdi Davari Esfahani; N Yedukondalu; Youjun Zhang; Ivan A Kruglov; Jianshi Zhou; Eran Greenberg; Vitali B Prakapenka; Jin Liu; Artem R Oganov; Jung-Fu Lin Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Di Zhou; Dmitrii V Semenok; Hui Xie; Xiaoli Huang; Defang Duan; Alex Aperis; Peter M Oppeneer; Michele Galasso; Alexey I Kartsev; Alexander G Kvashnin; Artem R Oganov; Tian Cui Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Shirin Mozaffari; Dan Sun; Vasily S Minkov; Alexander P Drozdov; Dmitry Knyazev; Jonathan B Betts; Mari Einaga; Katsuya Shimizu; Mikhail I Eremets; Luis Balicas; Fedor F Balakirev Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 14.919