| Literature DB >> 33037249 |
Prabhakar Yellanur Konda1, Vijayakumar Poondla2, Krishna Kumar Jaiswal3, Sreenivasulu Dasari4, Reddemma Uyyala5,6, Venkata Prasad Surtineni4, Janardhan Yadav Egi7, Anthony Johnson Antony Masilamani8, Lakshmi Bestha9, Sreenath Konanki10, Muthukumaran Muthulingam11, Lakshman Kumar Lingamgunta4, Bindu Prasuna Aloor12, Sridevi Tirumalaraju13, Ankanna Sade14, Venkata Ratnam Kamsala12, Sreeharsha Nagaraja15, Ranjani Ramakrishnan16, Vijayakumar Natesan17.
Abstract
The high fat diet alters intestinal microbiota due to increased intestinal permeability and susceptibility to microbial antigens leads to metabolic endotoxemia. But probiotic juices reported for various health benefits. In this background we hypothesized that pectinase treated probiotic banana juice has diverse effects on HFD induced obesity and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. 20 weeks fed HFD successfully induced obesity and its associated complications in experimental rats. The supplementation of probiotic banana juice for 5 months at a dose of 5 mL/kg bw/day resulted significant decrease (p < 0.05) in body weight (380 ± 0.34), total fat (72 ± 0.8), fat percentage (17 ± 0.07) and fat free mass (165 ± 0.02). Reduction (p < 0.05) in insulin resistance (5.20 ± 0.03), lipid profile (TC 120 ± 0.05; TG 160 ± 0.24; HDL 38 ± 0.03), liver lipid peroxidation (0.7 ± 0.01), hepatic enzyme markers (AST 82 ± 0.06; ALT 78 ± 0.34; ALP 42 ± 0.22), and hepatic steatosis by increasing liver antioxidant potential (CAT 1.4 ± 0.30; GSH 1.04 ± 0.04; SOD 0.82 ± 0.22) with normal hepatic triglycerides (15 ± 0.02) and glycogen (0.022 ± 0.15) contents and also showed normal liver size, less accumulation of lipid droplets with only a few congestion. It is concluded that the increased intestinal S. cerevisiae yeast can switch anti-obesity, antidiabetic, antioxidative stress, antioxidant and anti-hepatosteatosis effect. This study results will have significant implications for treatment of NAFLD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33037249 PMCID: PMC7547728 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73670-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The composition of dried banana peel.
| Constituents (%)* | Dried peel |
|---|---|
| Pectin | 25.0 ± 0.07 |
| Moisture | 14.0 ± 0.02 |
| Reducing sugars | 30.0 ± 0.32 |
| Non-reducing sugars | 3.0 ± 0.26 |
| Protein | 6.0 ± 0.03 |
| Cellulose and lignin | 22.0 ± 0.15 |
*On dry weight basis (total solids = 80 ± 0.03).
Mean ± SE values (n = 3).
Figure 1Effect of pH, temperature and incubation time on PGA and PL production in SMF method. (A) pH on PGA production. (B) pH on PL production. (C) Temperature on PGA production. (D) Temperature on PL production. (E) Incubation time on PGA production and. (F) Incubation time on PL production. PGA polygalacturonase; PL pectin lyase; SMF sub-merged fermentation. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs of Musa paradisiaca (Robusta- AAA) banana peel (A) enzyme treated and (B) control (scale bar = 100 μm).
Temperature effect on clarification of banana juice by pectinase of S. cerevisiae and standard commercial pectinase.
| Temperature (°C) | Pectinase ( | Commercial pectinase (% T 650 nm) (blank 40%) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 25.2 ± 0.03 | 29.9 ± 0.17 |
| 15 | 39.1 ± 0.07 | 42.5 ± 0.21 |
| 20 | 46.7 ± 0.05 | 50.1 ± 0.08 |
| 25 | 58.0 ± 0.10 | 59.0 ± 0.02 |
| 30 | 69.8 ± 0.26 | 71.7 ± 0.34 |
| 35 | 80.2 ± 0.08 | 84.5 ± 0.02 |
| 40 | 72.0 ± 0.04 | 76.0 ± 0.06 |
| 45 | 65.5 ± 0.17 | 70.1 ± 0.12 |
| 50 | 58.8 ± 0.02 | 64.6 ± 0.03 |
Mean ± SE (n = 3); %T = % of transmission of light.
Comparison of pectinase from S. cerevisiae and commercial pectinase in pectin degradation and clarification of banana juice at various incubation times at 35 °C.
| Time (min) | Pectinase from | Commercial pectinase clarity (%T) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (650 nm) | AGA* (%) | (650 nm) | AGA* (%) | |
| 0 | 60.4 ± 0.05 | 0 | 61.5 ± 0.01 | 0 |
| 60 | 69.0 ± 0.02 | 0 | 70.8 ± 0.04 | 0 |
| 120 | 77.8 ± 0.16 | 0 | 78.0 ± 0.15 | 0 |
| 180 | 84.5 ± 0.04 | 0 | 83.3 ± 0.27 | 1.02 ± 0.07 |
| 240 | 96.9 ± 0.12 | 10.0 ± 0.01 | 95.0 ± 0.64 | 1.40 ± 0.04 |
| 300 | 95.0 ± 0.07 | 10.5 ± 0.17 | 94.7 ± 0.55 | 1.65 ± 0.16 |
*AGA anhydrogalacturonic acid; mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 3Effect of PPBJ on food intake, body weight and body composition in control and HFD induced obese rats for 20 weeks. (A) Food intake. (B) Body weights. (C) Body Mass Index. (D) Lean body mass. (E) Total fat. (F) Fat free mass and (G) Fat percentage. PPBJ pectinase treated probiotic banana juice; HFD high fat diet; ORL Orlistat. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 each group). Statistically significance compared to their respective controls ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Groups compared using one way ANOVA.
Figure 4Effect of PPBJ on (A) Fasting blood glucose. (B) HbA1c (C) insulin, (D) Leptin and (E) Adiponectin. FBG fasting blood glucose; HbA1c glycosylated hemoglobin; ORL Orlistat. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 each group). Statistically significance compared to their respective controls ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Groups compared using one way ANOVA.
Figure 5Effect of PPBJ on Insulin resistance. (A) HOMA-IR. (B) HOMA-beta and (C) OGTT. HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-beta homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function. OGTT oral glucose tolerance test; ORL Orlistat. Data was presented as Mean ± SEM (n = 6 each group). Statistically significance compared to their respective controls ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Groups compared using one way ANOVA.
Figure 6Effect of PPBJ on lipid metabolism and liver functional markers. (A) Total cholesterol. (B) Triglycerides. (C) HDL. (D) AST. (E) ALT and (F) ALP. HDL high density lipoproteins; AST aspartate transaminase; ALT alanine transaminase, and ALP alkaline phosphatase. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 each group). Statistically significance compared to their respective controls ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Groups compared using one way ANOVA.
Liver organ weights of different groups.
| Group | Livers weight (g) |
|---|---|
| G-1 | 10.60 ± 0.22a |
| G-2 | 10.05 ± 0.03a |
| G-3 | 20.12 ± 0.37b |
| G-4 | 12.45 ± 0.08a |
| G-5 | 12.23 ± 0.45a |
Figure 7Effect of PPBJ on liver Lipid peroxidation. (A) MDA content. (B) CAT. (C) GSH and (D) SOD. MDA malondialdehyde; CAT catalase; GSH reduced glutathione; SOD superoxide dismutase. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 each group). Statistically significance compared to their respective controls ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Groups compared using one way ANOVA.
Figure 8Effect of PPBJ on quantification of hepatic triglycerides, glycogen and, H & E staining for hepato steatosis. (A) Quantification of hepatic triglycerides. (B) Quantification of hepatic glycogen. (C) Control liver. (D) HFD obese liver (hepato steatosis) and (E) HFD treated with PPBJ liver. PPBJ pectinase treated probiotic banana juice; HFD high fat diet; ORL Orlistat. H & E hematoxylin and eosin staining. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 each group). Statistically significance compared to their respective controls ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Groups compared using one way ANOVA.