Literature DB >> 33036791

Anthropometric biomarkers for abnormal prenatal reproductive hormone exposure in women with Mayer-Rokitanksy-Küster-Hauser syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome, and endometriosis.

Henrike E Peters1, Claire H C Laeven2, Constantia J M A Trimbos2, Peter M van de Ven3, Marieke O Verhoeven2, Roel Schats2, Velja Mijatovic4, Cornelis B Lambalk2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether markers of prenatal exposure to reproductive hormones are related to Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and endometriosis.
DESIGN: Case-control study. Comparison of sex hormone-related external genital and digital characteristics in cases and controls.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): We enrolled 172 women in four groups-women with MKRH, women with PCOS, women with endometriosis, and controls (43 in each group). INTERVENTION(S): Measurement of two anthropometric biomarkers: anogenital distance and digit ratio. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Anogenital distance was measured from the anus to the anterior clitoral surface (AGDac) and from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDaf). For the digit ratio we used a direct, as well as a computer-assisted graphic measurement to measure the length of the second and fourth digit. RESULT(S): After adjustment for body mass index and age, AGDac was the shortest in endometriosis and the longest in PCOS groups, with a mean difference of 10 mm (95% confidence interval 3.1-16.8). AGDaf but not AGDac measures were found to be significantly larger in the MRKH group, with a mean difference compared with controls of 2.6 mm (95% confidence interval 0.1-5.2). The digit ratio was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION(S): In this study we did find limited evidence for androgen exposure during the development of MRKH. This is compatible with the hypothesis that the uterovaginal agenesis may have been the result of temporary prenatal exposure to altered gonadal hormone concentrations. For endometriosis and PCOS we confirm previously observed associations for anogenital distance reflecting possible estrogen-based and androgen-based intrauterine origins, respectively. DUTCH TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR7492.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome; anogenital distance; digit ratio; endometriosis; polycystic ovary syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33036791     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Anogenital Distance and Endometriosis: Results of a Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Laura Buggio; Edgardo Somigliana; Greta Sergenti; Federica Ottolini; Dhouha Dridi; Paolo Vercellini
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Variation among human populations in endometriosis and PCOS A test of the inverse comorbidity model.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 3.  Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders.

Authors:  Natalie L Dinsdale; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Midgestation origins of androgenic and estrogenic pathophysiology in three major women's health disorders.

Authors:  David H Abbott; Daniel A Dumesic
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 7.490

5.  A Systematic Review of Anogenital Distance and Gynecological Disorders: Endometriosis and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zhenyan Pan; Fangfang Zhu; Kai Zhou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.