| Literature DB >> 33036612 |
So-Lun Lee1,2, Christopher O'Callaghan3, Yu-Lung Lau4, Chun-Wai Davy Lee4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To aid in the diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) and to evaluate the respiratory epithelium in respiratory disease, normal age-related reference ranges are needed for ciliary beat frequency (CBF), beat pattern and ultrastructure. Our aim was to establish reference ranges for healthy Chinese children.Entities:
Keywords: Beat frequency; Beat pattern; Chinese children; Nasal cilia; Reference data; Ultrastructure
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33036612 PMCID: PMC7545929 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-020-01506-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Analysis of ciliary beat frequency and beat pattern measurements
| Age (years) | N | Meana | SD | 5th, 95th percentiles | Dyskinetically beating edges (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 18 | 135 | 10.1 | 2.0 | 6.3, 13.5 | 20.9 (0.0, 56.4) |
| 2–6 | 51 | 10.3 | 2.0 | 6.9, 13.8 | 24.2 (0.0, 60.0) |
| 7–12 | 43 | 10.1 | 2.1 | 5.8, 13.5 | 18.0 (0.0, 50.0) |
| 13–17 | 41 | 9.9 | 1.9 | 6.1, 13.1 | 19.8 (0.0, 50.0) |
| 44 | 9.5 | 1.9 | 5.4, 11.9 | 14.9 (0.4, 44.7) |
aMean ciliary beat frequency (Hz), standard deviation (SD), and 5th, 95th percentiles
bmean (5th, 95th percentiles) percentage of edges exhibiting areas of ciliary dyskinesia
UK reference CBF mean for < 18 years 12.8 (95% CI 12.3 to 13.3)1 vs ours < 18 mean CBF 10.1 (95% CI 9.8 to 10.4) (p < 0.05, t-test).
Effect of exposure to second-hand smoking on ciliary beat frequency
| Age (years) | Family member(s) smoked | No | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | |||||
| N | *Mean | N | *Mean | ||
| < 18 | 46 | 9.9 | 89 | 10.2 | 0.284 |
| 2–6 | 11 | 10.4 + 1.53 | 40 | 10.3 | 0.886 |
| 7–12 | 21 | 9.7 | 22 | 10.4 | 0.289 |
| 13–17 | 14 | 9.7 | 27 | 10.0 | 0.575 |
| 10 | 10.5 | 34 | 9.2 | 0.044 | |
Fig. 1Relationship of the ciliary beat frequency (CBF) with age (years). a Mean CBF plotted against age for all subjects showing a negative correlation between increasing age and a reduction in CBF. Mean (solid line) and ± 1.96 standard deviation (dashed line) regression lines were indicated. b Ciliated edges with the highest and CBF within a nasal sample plotted against age for all subjects. Mean (solid line) and ± 1.96 standard deviation (dashed line) regression lines were indicated. c Ciliated edges with the lowest CBF within a nasal sample plotted against age for all subjects. Mean (solid line) and ± 1.96 standard deviation (dashed line) regression lines were indicated
Transmission electron microscopy examination of cell types
| Age (years) | N | Ciliated cells (%) | Unciliated cells (%) | Mucous cells (%) | Dead cells (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 18 | 95 | 52.0 (0.0, 100.0) | 35.8 (0.0, 100.0) | 12.2 (0.0, 52.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) |
| 2–6 | 37 | 53.6 (0.0, 100.0) | 37.1 (0.0, 100.0) | 9.3 (0.0, 34.3) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) |
| 7–12 | 30 | 46.0 (0.0, 100.0) | 38.3 (0.0, 100.0) | 15.7 (0.0, 78.7) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) |
| 13–17 | 28 | 56.4 (0.0, 100.0) | 31.3 (0.0, 77.8) | 12.3 (0.0, 55.5) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) |
| 26 | 51.0 (17.8, 93.0) | 36.5 (3.6, 77.5) | 12.3 (0.0, 43.0) | 0.2 (0.0, 2.7) |
Results are expressed as the mean percentage (5th, 95th percentiles) for each age group.
Fig. 2Transmission electron micrographs showing the normal epithelium and the parameters assessed to examine the epithelial damage. a Normal with a normal healthy mitochondrion (arrow, bar = 1 μm). b Loss of cilia, grade 3, and a cell with a damaged mitochondrion (arrow, bar = 1 μm). c Cellular extrusion, grade 2, (bar = 2 μm). d Cytoplasmic blebbing, grade 2 (arrow, bar = 2 μm)
Assessment of epithelial integrity by transmission electron microscopy
| Age (years) | N | Cells with loss of cilia (%) | Cells extruding from epithelial edge (%) | Cells with cytoplasmic blebbing (%) | Cells with mitochondrial damage (%) | Epithelial integrity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 18 | 95 | 41.4 (0.0, 56.8) | 31.5 (0.0, 67.0) | 21.1 (0.0, 100.0) | 16.3 (0.0, 100.0) | 1.83 (0.8, 3.0) |
| 2–6 | 37 | 55.1 (0.0, 100.0) | 26.1 (0.0, 67.0) | 10.8 (0.0, 50.0) | 14.9 (0.0, 100.0) | 1.8 (0.0, 3.1) |
| 7–12 | 30 | 44.4 (0.0, 100.0) | 41.0 (0.0, 90.9) | 29.2 (0.0, 100.0) | 14.4 (0.0, 100.0) | 2.1 (0.0, 3.5) |
| 13–17 | 28 | 20.3 (0.0, 56.8) | 28.6 (0.0, 67.0) | 25.9 (0.0, 100.0) | 20.2 (0.0, 100.0) | 1.6 (0.0, 3.0) |
| 26 | 49.3 (0.0, 100.0) | 40.2 (6.0, 67.0) | 24.7 (0.0, 61.1) | 13.4 (0.0, 100.0) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) |
Results are expressed as the mean percentage (5th, 95th percentiles) for each age group.
Fig. 3Transmission electron micrographs illustrating the assessment of epithelial integrity. a Normal nasal epithelium with an intact ciliated surface and minimal disruption (epithelial integrity score = 0, bar = 2 μm). b Abnormal epithelium with severely disrupted cell surface and marked loss of cilia (epithelial integrity score = 4, bar = 2 μm)
Analysis of ciliary ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy
| Age (years) | N | Outers | Inners | Dynein arm defects (%) | Microtubules defects (%) | Central microtubules defects (%) | Compound cilia (%) | Other defects (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 18 | 121 | 8.5 (7.5, 9.0) | 7.8 (6.5, 8.6) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 9.3 (0.0, 28.4) | 1.5 (0.0, 9.1) | 0.5 (0.0, 5.8) | 0.9 (0.0, 6.6) |
| 2–6 | 46 | 8.5 (7.8, 9.0) | 7.8 (6.9, 8.5) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 8.3 (0.0, 27.9) | 1.5 (0.0, 10.4) | 0.2 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.5 (0.0, 7.0) |
| 7–12 | 36 | 8.3 (6.9, 9.0) | 7.6 (4.2, 8.5) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 5.3 (0.0, 22.6) | 2.7 (0.0, 19.7) | 1.0 (0.0, 9.2) | 0.3 (0.0, 3.1) |
| 13–17 | 39 | 8.7 (8.3, 9.0) | 8.1 (6.7, 8.8) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 14.4 (0.0, 37.8) | 0.4 (0.0, 3.7) | 0.4 (0.0, 6.3) | 1.8 (0.0, 11.1) |
| 38 | 8.5 (7.0, 9.0) | 7.3 (5.8, 8.5) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 10.1 (0.0, 31.5) | 1.9 (0.0, 16.1) | 0.7 (0.0, 6.3) | 0.9 (0.0, 13.1) |
Results are expressed as the mean percentage (5th, 95th percentiles) for each age group.
Fig. 4Transmission electron micrographs demonstrating the representative image of ciliary ultrastructural defects. a Normal. b-e Microtubule defects. f-g Central microtubules defects. h Compound cilia. i Combination of microtubule defects.