| Literature DB >> 33036039 |
Jannick De Tobel1,2,3,4, Christian Ottow5, Thomas Widek6,7,8, Isabella Klasinc9, Håkan Mörnstad10, Patrick Werner Thevissen2, Koenraad Luc Verstraete1.
Abstract
Medical imaging for forensic age estimation in living adolescents and young adults continues to be controversial and a subject of discussion. Because age estimation based on medical imaging is well studied, it is the current gold standard. However, large disparities exist between the centers conducting age estimation, both between and within countries. This review provides an overview of the most common approaches applied in Europe, with case examples illustrating the differences in imaging modalities, in staging of development, and in statistical processing of the age data. Additionally, the review looks toward the future because several European research groups have intensified studies on age estimation, exploring four strategies for optimization: (1) increasing sample sizes of the reference populations, (2) combining single-site information into multifactorial information, (3) avoiding ionizing radiation, and (4) conducting a fully automated analysis. Thieme. All rights reserved.Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33036039 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ISSN: 1089-7860 Impact factor: 1.777