| Literature DB >> 33035537 |
Margaret N Ruesch1, Luca Benetti2, Eileen Berkay3, David J Cirelli4, Neha Frantz5, Martin H Gastens6, Wayne P Kelley7, Juliana Kretsinger8, Mike Lewis3, Shawn Novick9, Barbara Rellahan10, Laura Pack11, Corné J M Stroop12, Ann Subashi13, Ping Yin14, Ming Zeng15, John Stults16.
Abstract
Commercial specifications for a new biotherapeutic product are a critical component of the product's overall control strategy that ensures safety and efficacy. This paper describes strategies for setting commercial specifications as proposed by a consortium of industry development scientists. The specifications for some attributes are guided by compendia and regulatory guidance. For other product quality attributes (PQAs), product knowledge and the understanding of attribute criticality built throughout product development should drive specification setting. The foundation of PQA knowledge is an understanding of potential patient impact through an assessment of potency, PK, immunogenicity and safety. In addition to PQA knowledge, the ability of the manufacturing process to consistently meet specifications, typically assessed through statistical analyses, is an important consideration in the specification-setting process. Setting acceptance criteria that are unnecessarily narrow can impact the ability to supply product or prohibit consideration of future convenient dosage forms. Patient-centric specifications enable appropriate control over higher risk PQAs to ensure product quality for the patient, and flexibility for lower risk PQAs for a sustainable supply chain. This paper captures common strategic approaches for setting specifications for standard biotherapeutic products such as monoclonal antibodies and includes considerations for ensuring specifications are patient centric.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody drug conjugate; Biopharmaceutical characterization; Compendium; Monoclonal antibody(s); Physicochemical; Quality by design; Regulatory science
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33035537 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0022-3549 Impact factor: 3.534