Literature DB >> 33034931

Retest positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in pregnant women recovered from COVID-19.

C Zanardini1, B Saccani2, L Franceschetti1, S Zatti1, E Sartori1, F Prefumo1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33034931      PMCID: PMC7675411          DOI: 10.1002/uog.23144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   8.678


× No keyword cloud information.
In Italy, following initial World Health Organization recommendations , every patient with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is retested twice after 14 days of strict quarantine to determine recovery. Every patient who requires elective or emergency admission to hospital is also tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA. Here, we describe two cases of asymptomatic pregnant women recovered from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection who later retested positive. In the first case, a 33‐year‐old pregnant woman was admitted at 24 weeks of gestation with fever, asthenia and a cough in March 2020. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of a nasopharyngeal swab was positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. Chest X‐ray and lung ultrasound revealed bilateral and multifocal interstitial pneumonia. Blood tests revealed lymphopenia and anemia. After 5 days, the woman was discharged home. At the end of 14 days of strict quarantine, she was retested twice, with two consecutive negative results. In July, she was admitted for spontaneous labor at 41 + 0 weeks. She was retested for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA and had a positive result, although she was asymptomatic with normal chest X‐ray and blood tests. She delivered a healthy male neonate weighing 3470 g. In the second case, a 27‐year‐old pregnant woman, asymptomatic for COVID‐19, was tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA at 32 + 0 weeks of gestation in April 2020, due to being in close contact with a COVID‐19 patient, and the result was positive. After 14 days of quarantine, she was retested twice, with two consecutive negative results. The pregnancy was subsequently uncomplicated. At the beginning of June, 2 days before admission for planned induction of labor at 41 + 4 weeks, she was retested for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA and was found to be positive, although she was still asymptomatic for COVID‐19. She had a normal chest X‐ray and blood tests, and delivered a healthy male neonate weighing 3185 g. A recent systematic review suggested that 12% of non‐pregnant patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 may become positive again on molecular testing after two consecutive negative nasopharyngeal swabs . From 6th March 2020 to 23rd September, at our hospital, there were 15 women who tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 who became negative during pregnancy and were retested at delivery; our retest‐positive rate was therefore 2/15 (13%). Clinically significant recurrences of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection have been reported mainly in studies in which recovery was defined based on the duration of absence of symptoms, rather than on negative molecular testing . However, most patients who retest positive after negative laboratory testing do not present with recurrence or worsening of symptoms , . It is still unclear whether a positive retest might be due to sampling or laboratory issues causing false‐negatives or false‐positives, the effect of medications (for example, corticosteroids) on viral clearance, viral reactivation or actual reinfection . A positive retest may also be due to viral gene fragments and does not necessarily imply viral integrity and, hence, transmission potential , . Our cases bring attention to the discharge standards for COVID‐19 in pregnancy. Even though the clinical evolution was favorable for both the mothers and infants, practitioners should be aware of the possibility of retesting positive in pregnancy. Although there is probably a low chance that retest‐positive patients may transmit the disease , pregnant/postpartum women with these features should be managed as potentially infectious.
  4 in total

1.  Clinical recurrences of COVID-19 symptoms after recovery: Viral relapse, reinfection or inflammatory rebound?

Authors:  Marie Gousseff; Pauline Penot; Laure Gallay; Dominique Batisse; Nicolas Benech; Kevin Bouiller; Rocco Collarino; Anne Conrad; Dorsaf Slama; Cédric Joseph; Adrien Lemaignen; François-Xavier Lescure; Bruno Levy; Matthieu Mahevas; Bruno Pozzetto; Nicolas Vignier; Benjamin Wyplosz; Dominique Salmon; Francois Goehringer; Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.072

2.  Retest positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA of "recovered" patients with COVID-19: Persistence, sampling issues, or re-infection?

Authors:  Hanyujie Kang; Yishan Wang; Zhaohui Tong; Xuefeng Liu
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 20.693

3.  Clinical, immunological and virological characterization of COVID-19 patients that test re-positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Jinju Peng; Qianling Xiong; Zhe Liu; Huifang Lin; Xiaohua Tan; Min Kang; Runyu Yuan; Lilian Zeng; Pingping Zhou; Chumin Liang; Lina Yi; Louis du Plessis; Tie Song; Wenjun Ma; Jiufeng Sun; Oliver G Pybus; Changwen Ke
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 4.  SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Camilla Mattiuzzi; Brandon M Henry; Fabian Sanchis-Gomar; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-09-07
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of discharged COVID-19 patients retesting positive for RT-PCR.

Authors:  Xiangying Ren; Xiangge Ren; Jiaao Lou; Yongbo Wang; Qiao Huang; Yuexian Shi; Yuqing Deng; Xiaoyan Li; Liye Lu; Siyu Yan; Yunyun Wang; Lisha Luo; Xiantao Zeng; Xiaomei Yao; Yinghui Jin
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-04-17

2.  Scientific effort in combating COVID-19 in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  R J Martinez-Portilla; M M Gil; L C Poon
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Continued nucleic acid tests for SARS-CoV-2 following discharge of patients with COVID-19 in Lu'an, China.

Authors:  Yong Lyu; Danni Wang; Xiude Li; Tianqi Gong; Pengpeng Xu; Lei Liu; Jie Sun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.