Literature DB >> 33034690

Temporal trends of outcomes of neutropenic patients with ARDS enrolled in therapeutic clinical trials.

David R Price1,2, Katherine L Hoffman3, Elizabeth Sanchez2, Augustine M K Choi1,2, Ilias I Siempos4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33034690      PMCID: PMC7545373          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06263-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Outcomes of critically ill patients with neutropenia (including those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)) improve over time, as suggested by data from observational studies [1, 2]. However, relevant data from randomized controlled trials are lacking. It is important to clarify the temporal trends of outcomes of patients with neutropenia as prognostic data like these provide important information for clinicians, patients and their family members when faced with decisions regarding intensive care unit (ICU) admission and supportive care. We performed a secondary analysis of patient-level data from subjects with ARDS enrolled in six randomized controlled trials performed by the ARDS Network (ARDSNet), namely ARMA (published in 2000), ALVEOLI (2004), FACTT (2006), ALTA (2011), EDEN (2012), and SAILS (2014). Access to trial data was received after submission of our protocol (available upon request) and pre-specified analyses, to the NIH/NHLBI BioLINCC. Our analysis was approved by the Weill Cornell Institutional Review Board (#1708018504). Some of our results were previously presented as a meeting abstract [3]. All enrolled patients had ARDS [4]. Neutropenia, determined on enrollment day 0, was defined as a total white blood cell count less than 1000 cells/µL [1, 2]. The primary outcome was 60-day mortality. Ventilator-free days and ICU-free days, as previously defined [4, 5], were secondary outcomes. Detailed statistical methods (including full model and adjustments) are provided in Supplementary Appendix. Of 4333 subjects with ARDS enrolled in the trials, 204 (4.7%) had neutropenia. Detailed description of patients’ characteristics and etiology of neutropenia is provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Enrollment of neutropenic subjects did not change over time (p = 0.28). The median white blood cell count at enrollment was 277 [interquartile range (IQR) 137–600] cell/µL among neutropenic compared to 11,300 (IQR 7200–15,970) cell/µL among non-neutropenic patients. The unadjusted analysis is shown in the Fig. 1. After adjusting for variables previously shown to affect mortality of neutropenic patients (namely, age, baseline vasopressor requirement and renal dysfunction) [1], the odds of 60-day mortality decreased by an estimate 8% [95% confidence intervals (CI) − 0.8 to 16%, p = 0.073] per year among neutropenic patients compared to 5.1% (95% CI 3.6–6.6%, p < 0.001) per year among non-neutropenic patients. This adjusted difference between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients was significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, both ventilator-free days and ICU-free days increased more among neutropenic than non-neutropenic patients in the adjusted analysis (p < 0.001 for both) (Supplementary Table 3).
Fig. 1

Temporal trends of outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome enrolled in therapeutic clinical trials. Temporal trends of A 60-day mortality, B ventilator-free days and C intensive care unit (ICU)-free days of neutropenic (blue) and non-neutropenic (red) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) enrolled in six ARDSNet trials. Circles correspond to mean outcome (e.g., mean 60-day mortality) within each ARDSNet trial while circle size represents number of enrolled subjects, red and blue lines represent an unadjusted linear regression (95% confidence intervals) through the patient-level data points. Neutropenic patients per study: ARMA (N = 23), ALVEOLI (N = 12), FACTT (N = 57), ALTA (N = 34), EDEN (N = 42), and SAILS (N = 36)

Temporal trends of outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome enrolled in therapeutic clinical trials. Temporal trends of A 60-day mortality, B ventilator-free days and C intensive care unit (ICU)-free days of neutropenic (blue) and non-neutropenic (red) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) enrolled in six ARDSNet trials. Circles correspond to mean outcome (e.g., mean 60-day mortality) within each ARDSNet trial while circle size represents number of enrolled subjects, red and blue lines represent an unadjusted linear regression (95% confidence intervals) through the patient-level data points. Neutropenic patients per study: ARMA (N = 23), ALVEOLI (N = 12), FACTT (N = 57), ALTA (N = 34), EDEN (N = 42), and SAILS (N = 36) By analyzing patient-level data from 4333 patients with ARDS enrolled in six rigorous ARDSNet trials, we found that clinically relevant outcomes, such as mortality, ventilator-free days and ICU-free days, of neutropenic patients improved significantly more over the course of two decades compared to outcomes of non-neutropenic patients. Although limited by a highly selected (e.g., exclusion of stem cell transplant subjects) and relatively small number of neutropenic patients as well as by consideration of center-dependent outcomes (ventilator-free and ICU-free days), our findings are important. We show that the prognosis of these patients has improved over time even in prospective randomized controlled studies, whereas this trend has previously been observed only in retrospective observational studies [1, 6]. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb) Supplementary file2 (PPTX 106 kb) Supplementary file3 (DOCX 16 kb) Supplementary file4 (DOCX 14 kb) Supplementary file5 (DOCX 15 kb)
  5 in total

Review 1.  Changes in critically ill cancer patients' short-term outcome over the last decades: results of systematic review with meta-analysis on individual data.

Authors:  Michaël Darmon; Aurélie Bourmaud; Quentin Georges; Marcio Soares; Kyeongman Jeon; Sandra Oeyen; Chin Kook Rhee; Pascale Gruber; Marlies Ostermann; Quentin A Hill; Pieter Depuydt; Christelle Ferra; Anne-Claire Toffart; Peter Schellongowski; Alice Müller; Virginie Lemiale; Djamel Mokart; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Rapidly Improving ARDS in Therapeutic Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Edward J Schenck; Clara Oromendia; Lisa K Torres; David A Berlin; Augustine M K Choi; Ilias I Siempos
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with malignancies.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Virginie Lemiale; Djamel Mokart; Frédéric Pène; Achille Kouatchet; Pierre Perez; François Vincent; Julien Mayaux; Dominique Benoit; Fabrice Bruneel; Anne-Pascale Meert; Martine Nyunga; Antoine Rabbat; Michael Darmon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Lene Russell; Andry Van de Louw; Victoria Metaxa; Philippe Bauer; Pedro Povoa; José Garnacho Montero; Ignacio Martin Loeches; Sangeeta Mehta; Kathryn Puxty; Peter Schellongowski; Jordi Rello; Djamel Mokart; Virginie Lemiale; Adrien Mirouse
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Persistent severe acute respiratory distress syndrome for the prognostic enrichment of trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sanchez; David R Price; Kuei-Pin Chung; Clara Oromendia; Augustine M K Choi; Edward J Schenck; Ilias I Siempos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.