P Schepat1, H Herff2, M Alhareh1, V Wenzel3. 1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Friedrichshafen (Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen), Tübingen, Deutschland. 2. Praxis für Anästhesiologie, PAN Klinik, Köln, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Friedrichshafen (Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen), Tübingen, Deutschland. v.wenzel@klinikum-fn.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complete upper airway obstruction by a foreign body is a dramatic and acute emergency situation, and can result in rapid development of hypoxia, circulatory arrest and death. Special Magill pliers with an adjustable video optical system have been developed for airway inspection to facilitate efforts to remove foreign bodies causing obstruction of the upper airway. OBJECTIVE: To remove a simulated airway foreign body from a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manikin, either with normal Magill pliers or with the newly designed video Magill pliers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a brief introduction, 81 kindergarten teachers, 51 pupils (age 10-14 years) and 52 prospective emergency physicians were asked to remove a 2 × 2 "Lego" brick from the hypopharynx of a CPR manikin using either standard Magill pliers or the newly designed video Magill pliers. The formal hypothesis was that there would be no differences between the methods. Successful removal was defined as when the first removal attempt resulted in the Lego brick passing beyond the teeth of the manikin within 60s. RESULTS: The use of the video Magill pliers resulted in significantly higher success rates in removal of the simulated foreign airway body within 60 s compared to standard Magill pliers in kindergarten teachers (84% vs. 30%, p < 0.0001), pupils (84% vs. 18%, p < 0.0001) and prospective emergency physicians (92% vs. 40%, p < 0.0001). The time needed for removing the foreign airway body was significantly shorter in groups using the video Magill pliers (kindergarten teachers 29 ± 18s vs. 45 ± 19 s, pupils 29 ± 18s vs. 54 ± 14 s, and prospective emergency physicians 33 ± 18s vs. 45 ± 20 s; p < 0.0001). In an analogue points system (from 1 very simple to 10 extremely complicated), the user friendliness of the video Magill pliers was judged to be significantly higher than the standard Magill pliers (2.8 ± 1.6 vs. 7.8 ± 2.7 kindergarten teachers, 2.0 ± 1.3 vs. 7.2 ± 2.5 pupils and 3.2 ± 2.2 vs. 4.9 ± 3.1 prospective emergency physicians, p < 0.0001). Visibility of the airway foreign body was estimated to be significantly better employing the video Magill pliers compared to the standard Magill pliers (1.9 ± 1.4 vs. 9.8 ± 0.6 kindergarten teachers, pupils 1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 9.2 ± 1.6, prospective emergency physicians 2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 9.1 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this study kindergarten teachers, pupils (aged 10-14 years) and prospective emergency physicians had higher success rates in less time and reported better user friendliness and visibility using video Magill pliers compared to standard Magill pliers for removing a simulated foreign body from a CPR manikin airway.
BACKGROUND: Complete upper airway obstruction by a foreign body is a dramatic and acute emergency situation, and can result in rapid development of hypoxia, circulatory arrest and death. Special Magill pliers with an adjustable video optical system have been developed for airway inspection to facilitate efforts to remove foreign bodies causing obstruction of the upper airway. OBJECTIVE: To remove a simulated airway foreign body from a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manikin, either with normal Magill pliers or with the newly designed video Magill pliers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a brief introduction, 81 kindergarten teachers, 51 pupils (age 10-14 years) and 52 prospective emergency physicians were asked to remove a 2 × 2 "Lego" brick from the hypopharynx of a CPR manikin using either standard Magill pliers or the newly designed video Magill pliers. The formal hypothesis was that there would be no differences between the methods. Successful removal was defined as when the first removal attempt resulted in the Lego brick passing beyond the teeth of the manikin within 60s. RESULTS: The use of the video Magill pliers resulted in significantly higher success rates in removal of the simulated foreign airway body within 60 s compared to standard Magill pliers in kindergarten teachers (84% vs. 30%, p < 0.0001), pupils (84% vs. 18%, p < 0.0001) and prospective emergency physicians (92% vs. 40%, p < 0.0001). The time needed for removing the foreign airway body was significantly shorter in groups using the video Magill pliers (kindergarten teachers 29 ± 18s vs. 45 ± 19 s, pupils 29 ± 18s vs. 54 ± 14 s, and prospective emergency physicians 33 ± 18s vs. 45 ± 20 s; p < 0.0001). In an analogue points system (from 1 very simple to 10 extremely complicated), the user friendliness of the video Magill pliers was judged to be significantly higher than the standard Magill pliers (2.8 ± 1.6 vs. 7.8 ± 2.7 kindergarten teachers, 2.0 ± 1.3 vs. 7.2 ± 2.5 pupils and 3.2 ± 2.2 vs. 4.9 ± 3.1 prospective emergency physicians, p < 0.0001). Visibility of the airway foreign body was estimated to be significantly better employing the video Magill pliers compared to the standard Magill pliers (1.9 ± 1.4 vs. 9.8 ± 0.6 kindergarten teachers, pupils 1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 9.2 ± 1.6, prospective emergency physicians 2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 9.1 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this study kindergarten teachers, pupils (aged 10-14 years) and prospective emergency physicians had higher success rates in less time and reported better user friendliness and visibility using video Magill pliers compared to standard Magill pliers for removing a simulated foreign body from a CPR manikin airway.