Literature DB >> 33033834

Associations among individual gilt birth weight, litter birth weight phenotype, and the efficiency of replacement gilt production.

Jennifer Patterson1, Mari L Bernardi2, Matt Allerson3, Aaron Hanson3, Nick Holden3, Laura Bruner4, Juan C Pinilla5, George Foxcroft1.   

Abstract

Selection for larger litter size has increased the number of low individual birth weight (BWi) pigs and produced sows with a repeatable low average litter birth weight phenotype (BWP). Using an average of 3.6 litters records per sow, BWP was established in 644 nucleus-multiplication sows producing replacement gilts in a large commercial operation and classified as low (L-BWP, <1.18 kg, n = 85), medium (M-BWP, ≥1.18 to ≤1.35 kg, n = 250), or high (H-BWP, >1.35 kg, n = 309) on the basis of a BWi of 1.18 kg below which there was a high risk of early mortality and the average BWi (1.35 kg) for the population. In subsequent litters, potential replacement gilts born to these sows (n = 7,341) received a unique identification tag that allowed the impact of BWi, BWP, and their interactions on the efficiency of replacement gilt production to be evaluated. Negative effects of BWi on mortality until day 4 after birth were confirmed (P < 0.05) and cumulative losses to weaning, to day 70 of age, and to final pre-selection at 165 d of age were affected (P ≤ 0.05) by the interaction between BWP and BWi. Among the 2,035 gilts for which records for selection efficiency and production to fourth parity were available, a lower BWi decreased the probability of gilts reaching pubertal estrus (P < 0.05) after 21 and 28 d of boar stimulation starting at 180 d of age, with no effect of BWP. Overall, neither BWi, BWP, nor their interaction affected age at puberty. After breeding, only the main effect of BWP affected productivity and retention in the sow herd. In parities 1 and 2, percent stillborn was higher in litters born to gilts from H-BWP compared with L-BWP dams (P < 0.05), and in parity 2, total born and born alive were lower in sows derived from H-BWP compared with other BWPs. There were no differences in retention based on BWP classes until parity 2, after which retention tended (P ≤ 0.09) to be lower in sows derived from H-BWP compared with L-BWP dams. These results provide evidence that sow BWP is an important factor in the overall efficiency of replacement gilt management. This study also confirms that effective gilt selection and pre-breeding management protocols support excellent sow lifetime productivity and mitigate the risk of a high BWP in the litter of origin affecting retention in the breeding herd.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth weight; gilts; litter of origin; sow lifetime productivity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33033834      PMCID: PMC7673077          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  28 in total

Review 1.  Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow.

Authors:  Tao-lin Yuan; Yu-hua Zhu; Meng Shi; Tian-tian Li; Na Li; Guo-yao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Jian-jun Zang; Feng-lai Wang; Jun-jun Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Sow removal in commercial herds: Patterns and animal level factors in Finland.

Authors:  Paula Bergman; Yrjö Tapio Gröhn; Päivi Rajala-Schultz; Anna-Maija Virtala; Claudio Oliviero; Olli Peltoniemi; Mari Heinonen
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 3.  Reproduction in farm animals in an era of rapid genetic change: will genetic change outpace our knowledge of physiology?

Authors:  G R Foxcroft
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.005

4.  Genome-wide prediction of age at puberty and reproductive longevity in sows.

Authors:  J K Tart; R K Johnson; J W Bundy; N N Ferdinand; A M McKnite; J R Wood; P S Miller; M F Rothschild; M L Spangler; D J Garrick; S D Kachman; D C Ciobanu
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Validation of the use of exogenous gonadotropins (PG600) to increase the efficiency of gilt development programs without affecting lifetime productivity in the breeding herd.

Authors:  J Patterson; E Triemert; B Gustafson; T Werner; N Holden; J C Pinilla; G Foxcroft
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Relationships between ovulation rate and embryonic and placental characteristics in multiparous sows at 35 days of pregnancy.

Authors:  C L A Da Silva; H van den Brand; B F A Laurenssen; M L W J Broekhuijse; E F Knol; B Kemp; N M Soede
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Regulatory gene network from a genome-wide association study for sow lifetime productivity traits.

Authors:  J-H Kang; E-A Lee; K-C Hong; J-M Kim
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis.

Authors:  C Rehfeldt; G Kuhn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Heritability estimates and effect on lifetime reproductive performance of age at puberty in sows.

Authors:  Qingqing Li; Xiaolong Yuan; Zitao Chen; Ailing Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Hao Zhang; Jiaqi Li
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.145

10.  Birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation and fetal susceptibility to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Andrea Ladinig; George Foxcroft; Carolyn Ashley; Joan K Lunney; Graham Plastow; John C S Harding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of physical or fenceline boar exposure and exogenous gonadotropins on puberty induction and subsequent fertility in gilts.

Authors:  Robert V Knox; Lidia S Arend; Ashley L Buerkley; Jennifer L Patterson; George R Foxcroft
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Gilt development to improve offspring performance and survivability.

Authors:  Jamil E G Faccin; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Joel M DeRouchey; Jason C Woodworth; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Dam parity structure and body condition during lactation influence piglet growth and gilt sexual maturation through pre-finishing.

Authors:  Lea A Rempel; Brittney N Keel; William T Oliver; James E Wells; Clay A Lents; Dan J Nonneman; Gary A Rohrer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.