D R Pettersson1, K S Hagen2, N C Sathe3, B D Clark4, D C Spencer2. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (D.R.P., B.D.C.) petterss@ohsu.edu. 2. Neurology (K.S.H., D.C.S.). 3. School of Medicine (N.C.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. 4. From the Departments of Radiology (D.R.P., B.D.C.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Middle cranial fossa encephaloceles are an increasingly recognized cause of epilepsy; however, they are also often encountered on neuroimaging in patients with no history of seizure. We characterized the MR imaging features of middle cranial fossa encephaloceles in seizure and nonseizure groups with the hope of uncovering features predictive of epileptogenicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with middle cranial fossa encephaloceles were prospectively identified during routine clinical practice of neuroradiology at a tertiary care hospital during an 18-month period. Thirty-five of 77 (45%) had a history of seizure, 20/77 (26%) had temporal lobe epilepsy, and 42/77 (55%) had no history of seizures. Middle cranial fossa encephalocele features on MR imaging were characterized, including depth, area, number, location, presence of adjacent encephalomalacia, and degree of associated parenchymal morphologic distortion. MR imaging features were compared between the seizure and nonseizure groups. RESULTS: No significant difference in MR imaging features of middle cranial fossa encephaloceles was seen when comparing the seizure and nonseizure groups. Comparison of just those patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (n = 20) with those with no history of seizure (n = 42) also found no significant difference in MR imaging features. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic MR imaging features of middle cranial fossa encephaloceles such as size, number, adjacent encephalomalacia, and the degree of adjacent parenchymal morphologic distortion may not be useful in predicting likelihood of epileptogenicity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Middle cranial fossa encephaloceles are an increasingly recognized cause of epilepsy; however, they are also often encountered on neuroimaging in patients with no history of seizure. We characterized the MR imaging features of middle cranial fossa encephaloceles in seizure and nonseizure groups with the hope of uncovering features predictive of epileptogenicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with middle cranial fossa encephaloceles were prospectively identified during routine clinical practice of neuroradiology at a tertiary care hospital during an 18-month period. Thirty-five of 77 (45%) had a history of seizure, 20/77 (26%) had temporal lobe epilepsy, and 42/77 (55%) had no history of seizures. Middle cranial fossa encephalocele features on MR imaging were characterized, including depth, area, number, location, presence of adjacent encephalomalacia, and degree of associated parenchymal morphologic distortion. MR imaging features were compared between the seizure and nonseizure groups. RESULTS: No significant difference in MR imaging features of middle cranial fossa encephaloceles was seen when comparing the seizure and nonseizure groups. Comparison of just those patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (n = 20) with those with no history of seizure (n = 42) also found no significant difference in MR imaging features. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic MR imaging features of middle cranial fossa encephaloceles such as size, number, adjacent encephalomalacia, and the degree of adjacent parenchymal morphologic distortion may not be useful in predicting likelihood of epileptogenicity.
Authors: Amal Abou-Hamden; Mandy Lau; Gavin Fabinyi; Samuel F Berkovic; Graeme D Jackson; L Anne Mitchell; Renate Kalnins; Greg Fitt; John S Archer Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Matthew L Carlson; William R Copeland; Colin L Driscoll; Michael J Link; David S Haynes; Reid C Thompson; Kyle D Weaver; George B Wanna Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 5.115