Literature DB >> 33031778

The Improved Mediastinal Drainage Strategy for the Enhanced Recovery System After Esophagectomy.

Dengyun Wang1, Lei Xu2, Fan Yang1, Zongfei Wang3, Haibo Sun3, Xiankai Chen2, Hounai Xie2, Yin Li4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The improved drainage strategy was the transperitoneal placement of a single mediastinal drainage tube after esophagectomy. This study aimed to explore its effect on the incidence of postoperative complications, pain scores, and hospital stay.
METHODS: Data from 108 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those in group A were treated with transthoracic placement of mediastinal drain and those in group B were treated with transperitoneal placement. The incidence of postoperative complications, pain scores, and postoperative hospital stay were compared.
RESULTS: The maximum pain scores in group B were significantly lower than those in group A from the first to the fourth postoperative days (PODs): POD1, 3.9 ± 0.7 vs 2.3 ± 0.7; POD2, 3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.1 ± 0.7; POD3, 3.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.7 ± 0.8; and POD4, 3.1 ± 0.7 vs 1.7 ± 0.8 (all P < .001). Compared with group A, there were fewer postoperative analgesic drug users in group B (44.6% vs 17.9%; P = .005), fewer cases of pleural effusion (10.7% vs 0%; P = .045), and fewer cases of closed thoracic drainage due to pleural effusion or pneumothorax (14.3% vs 0%; P = .014). There were no significant differences in the incidence of anastomotic leakage, mediastinitis, major pulmonary complications, major abdominal complications, surgical site infection, and total postoperative complications, without statistical differences in postoperative hospital stay and 30-d mortality (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The transperitoneal placement of a single mediastinal drain can reduce postoperative pain and the incidence of pleural effusion, without increasing the incidence of other major postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay.
Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33031778     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

Review 1.  Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways.

Authors:  Chao-Ying Kowa; Zhaosheng Jin; Tong J Gan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Transhiatal chest drainage in mediastinoscope and laparoscope-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katsuji Hisakura; Koichi Ogawa; Yoshimasa Akashi; Jaejeong Kim; Shoko Moue; Yusuke Ohara; Yohei Owada; Shinji Hashimoto; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Tatsuya Oda
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 1.522

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.