Deven C Patel1, Mark F Berry1, Prasha Bhandari1, Leah M Backhus2, Shehzaib Raees1, Winston Trope1, Abraham Nash1, Natalie S Lui1, Douglas Z Liou1, Joseph B Shrager3. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, California. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: shrager@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diaphragm plication (DP) improves pulmonary function and quality of life for those with diaphragm paralysis or dysfunction. It is unknown whether differing degrees of diaphragm dysfunction as measured by sniff testing affect results after plication. METHODS: Patients who underwent minimally invasive DP from 2008 to 2019 were dichotomized based on sniff test results: paradoxical motion (PM) versus no paradoxical motion (NPM); the latter included normal, decreased, and no motion. Preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) after DP was compared between groups. The impact of the diaphragm height index, a measure of diaphragm elevation, was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent preoperative sniff testing, DP, and postoperative PFT. Including all patients, DP resulted in a 17.8% ± 5.5% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P < .001), a 14.4% ± 5.3% improvement in forced vital capacity (P < .001), and a 4.7% ± 4.6% improvement in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (P = .539). There were greater improvements in the PM group (n = 16) compared with the NPM group (n = 10) for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (27.2% ± 6.0% versus 3.9% ± 6.2%; P = .017) and forced vital capacity (28.1% ± 5.3% versus -0.5% ± 3.3%; P = .001). There was no difference in the change in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide between groups. There were no differences between patients with PM and NPM in the postoperative course or complications. No value for diaphragm height index predicted improvement in PFT after DP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PM on sniff test have dramatically greater objective improvements in pulmonary function after plication compared with those without PM. Most patients without PM do not demonstrate improvement in standard PFT. Improvements in dyspnea require additional study.
BACKGROUND: Diaphragm plication (DP) improves pulmonary function and quality of life for those with diaphragm paralysis or dysfunction. It is unknown whether differing degrees of diaphragm dysfunction as measured by sniff testing affect results after plication. METHODS:Patients who underwent minimally invasive DP from 2008 to 2019 were dichotomized based on sniff test results: paradoxical motion (PM) versus no paradoxical motion (NPM); the latter included normal, decreased, and no motion. Preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) after DP was compared between groups. The impact of the diaphragm height index, a measure of diaphragm elevation, was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent preoperative sniff testing, DP, and postoperative PFT. Including all patients, DP resulted in a 17.8% ± 5.5% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P < .001), a 14.4% ± 5.3% improvement in forced vital capacity (P < .001), and a 4.7% ± 4.6% improvement in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (P = .539). There were greater improvements in the PM group (n = 16) compared with the NPM group (n = 10) for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (27.2% ± 6.0% versus 3.9% ± 6.2%; P = .017) and forced vital capacity (28.1% ± 5.3% versus -0.5% ± 3.3%; P = .001). There was no difference in the change in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide between groups. There were no differences between patients with PM and NPM in the postoperative course or complications. No value for diaphragm height index predicted improvement in PFT after DP. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with PM on sniff test have dramatically greater objective improvements in pulmonary function after plication compared with those without PM. Most patients without PM do not demonstrate improvement in standard PFT. Improvements in dyspnea require additional study.