| Literature DB >> 33031758 |
Gamal Shiha1, Marko Korenjak2, Wayne Eskridge3, Teresa Casanovas4, Patricia Velez-Moller5, Sari Högström6, Ben Richardson7, Christopher Munoz8, Sólveig Sigurðardóttir9, Alioune Coulibaly10, Miskovikj Milan11, Fabiana Bautista12, Nancy Wai Yee Leung13, Vicki Mooney9, Solomon Obekpa14, Eva Bech15, Naveen Polavarapu16, Abd Elkhalek Hamed17, Temur Radiani18, Edhie Purwanto19, Bisi Bright20, Mohammad Ali21, Cecil Kwaku Dovia22, Lone McColaugh23, Yiannoula Koulla24, Jean-François Dufour25, Reham Soliman26, Mohammed Eslam27.
Abstract
Despite its increased recognition as a major health threat, fatty liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction remains largely underdiagnosed and undertreated. An international consensus panel has called for the disease to be renamed from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and has suggested how the disease should be diagnosed. This Viewpoint explores the call from the perspective of patient advocacy groups. Patients are well aware of the negative consequences of the NAFLD acronym. This advocacy group enthusiastically endorses the call to reframe the disease, which we believe will ultimately have a positive effect on patient care and quality of life and, through this effect, will reduce the burden on health-care systems. For patients, policy makers, health planners, donors, and non-hepatologists, the new acronym MAFLD is clear, squarely placing the disease as a manifestation of metabolic dysfunction and improving understanding at a public health and patient level. The authors from representative patient groups are supportive of this change, particularly as the new acronym is meaningful to all citizens as well as governments and policy makers, and, above all, is devoid of any stigma.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33031758 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30294-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol