Gry St-Martin1, Lise Holst Thamsborg2, Berit Andersen3,4, Jette Christensen5, Dorthe Ejersbo6, Kirsten Jochumsen7, Tonje Johansen8, Lise Grupe Larsen9, Marianne Waldstrøm6,10, Elsebeth Lynge1,2. 1. Center for Epidemiological research, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark. 2. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 6. Department of Pathology, Vejle Sygehus, Vejle, Denmark. 7. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark. 8. Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark. 9. Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark. 10. Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cytology findings of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) are common among women under 30, but evidence on best management strategy is insufficient. We therefore investigated how different management strategies used in Denmark influenced biopsy rates and detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: Register-based cohort study including Danish women aged less than 30 years and born 1980-95, with ASCUS/LSIL as their first abnormal cervical cytology in 2008-16. Rates and relative risks (RR) of biopsy and detection of CIN3+, CIN2 and < CIN2 during two years follow-up were compared between women referred directly to colposcopy after ASCUS/LSIL or undergoing additional testing, including mRNA or DNA test for high risk HPV or repeat cytology. RESULTS: 19,946 women with ASCUS and 19,825 with LSIL were included in the study of whom 92% had adequate information about follow-up. Among women referred directly to biopsy, CIN3+ was detected among 21%, CIN2 in 17%, while 62% had < CIN2. Repeating cytology after 6 months reduced the biopsy rate to 44% of which 53% had < CIN2. Biopsy rates with HPV test were 67% for DNA test, 77% with 14-type mRNA test and 58% with 5-type mRNA test. The detection of CIN3+ was somewhat higher, between 13% and 14% for the three HPV tests vs. 11% with repeat cytology. However, the detection of < CIN2 (not indicating treatment) also increased with RR 2.11 (95% CI 2.01-2.21) for 14-type mRNA test, 1.35 (95% CI 1.29-1.41) for 5-type mRNA test, and 1.86 (95% CI 1.76-1.97) with HPV DNA test. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of management strategy influences both the detection rate for severe lesions (CIN3+) and the proportion of women followed up for potentially insignificant findings.
OBJECTIVE: Cytology findings of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) are common among women under 30, but evidence on best management strategy is insufficient. We therefore investigated how different management strategies used in Denmark influenced biopsy rates and detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: Register-based cohort study including Danish women aged less than 30 years and born 1980-95, with ASCUS/LSIL as their first abnormal cervical cytology in 2008-16. Rates and relative risks (RR) of biopsy and detection of CIN3+, CIN2 and < CIN2 during two years follow-up were compared between women referred directly to colposcopy after ASCUS/LSIL or undergoing additional testing, including mRNA or DNA test for high risk HPV or repeat cytology. RESULTS: 19,946 women with ASCUS and 19,825 with LSIL were included in the study of whom 92% had adequate information about follow-up. Among women referred directly to biopsy, CIN3+ was detected among 21%, CIN2 in 17%, while 62% had < CIN2. Repeating cytology after 6 months reduced the biopsy rate to 44% of which 53% had < CIN2. Biopsy rates with HPV test were 67% for DNA test, 77% with 14-type mRNA test and 58% with 5-type mRNA test. The detection of CIN3+ was somewhat higher, between 13% and 14% for the three HPV tests vs. 11% with repeat cytology. However, the detection of < CIN2 (not indicating treatment) also increased with RR 2.11 (95% CI 2.01-2.21) for 14-type mRNA test, 1.35 (95% CI 1.29-1.41) for 5-type mRNA test, and 1.86 (95% CI 1.76-1.97) with HPV DNA test. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of management strategy influences both the detection rate for severe lesions (CIN3+) and the proportion of women followed up for potentially insignificant findings.