| Literature DB >> 33029515 |
Reza Nori-Garavand1,2, Maryam Hormozi2,3, Leila Narimani1,2, Nasim Beigi Boroujeni2, Asghar Rajabzadeh1,2, Leila Zarei1,2, Masoud Beigi Boroujeni4, Mandana Beigi Boroujeni1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Freezing of ovarian tissue is used for preservation of fertility. The freezing-thawing process is accompanied by oxidative stress and induction of apoptosis. Apoptosis is a complex process that has been studied in animal models. The present study was aimed at investigating the effect of selenium on suppression of apoptosis during vitrification-thawing process of mice ovary via studying expression of apoptosis-related genes, and also, we aimed to design statistical models for the roles of single genes and gene-gene interactions in suppression of apoptosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33029515 PMCID: PMC7530498 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5389731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Primer sequences for amplification of cDNA.
| Gene | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Product length (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward: CAATGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCT | 208 |
| P53 | Forward: GTTTCCTCTTGGGCTTAGGG | 255 |
| Bax | Forward: CGAGCTGATCAGAACCATCA | 277 |
| Fas | Forward: GAGAATTGCTGAAGACATGACAATCC | 314 |
| Bcl-2 | Forward: TAAGCTGTCACAGAGGGGCT | 344 |
Expressions of the target genes (selenium group vs. control group).
| Gene | ∆∆CT (95% CI) | One sample | Two sample | Efficiency | RE (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Reference | 0.702 | |||
| P53 | 1.96 (0.69, 3.22) | 0.013∗ | 0.013∗ | 0.921 | 0.28 (0.16, 0.47) |
| Bax | 0.22 (-0.66, 1.11) | 0.530 | 0.622 | 0.728 | 0.88 (0.78, 1.00) |
| Fas | -0.11 (-1.56, 1.33) | 0.838 | 0.875 | 0.707 | 1.06 (0.68, 1.63) |
| Bcl-2 | -2.49 (-3.09, -1.89) | <0.001∗∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ | 0.734 | 3.49 (3.22, 3.78) |
∗Significant at 0.05. ∗∗∗Significant at 0.001. CIs of RE were computed using RE formula on lower and upper bounds of ∆CT (sample-control for each gene separately).
Expression of the target genes/Bcl-2 (selenium group vs. control group).
| Gene | ∆∆CT (95% CI) | One sample | Efficiency | RE (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Reference | 0.702 | ||
| Bcl-2 | Reference | 0.734 | ||
| P53 | 4.45 (2.78, 6.11) | 0.002∗∗ | 0.921 | 0.08 (0.05, 0.12) |
| Bax | 2.71 (1.97, 3.44) | <0.001∗∗∗ | 0.728 | 0.25 (0.24, 0.26) |
| Fas | 2.37 (0.61, 4.14) | 0.020∗ | 0.707 | 0.30 (0.21, 0.43) |
∗Significant at 0.05. ∗∗Significant at 0.01. ∗∗∗Significant at 0.001.
Figure 1Gene expression comparison in selenium (Se) and control (Cont) groups (independent t-test).
Figure 2Gene expression of the target genes if the treated group calibrated with the control group (one sample t-test).
Figure 3Gene expression of the target genes per expression Bcl-2 in the treated group calibrated with the control group (one sample t-test).
Figure 4Clustering gene expression in individual samples. (a) -∆CTs in selenium (Se) and control (Cont) groups. (b) -∆∆CTs in each treated sample.
General linear model for multiple adjustment of the associations of the genes with being the treated group.
| Model/covariate | Beta coefficient (95%, CI) | Wald test | Residual SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 0.268 | 0.856 | ||
| P53 | 0.01 (-0.28, 0.31) | 0.913 | ||
| Bax | 0.06 (-0.29, 0.42) | 0.672 | ||
| Fas | 0.06 (-0.20, 0.31) | 0.598 | ||
| Bcl-2 | -0.33 (-0.62, -0.04) | 0.032∗ | ||
| Intercept | 0.32 (-6.37, 7.01) | |||
| Model 2 | 0.111 | 0.990 | ||
| P53 | 0.10 (-0.60, 0.79) | 0.601 | ||
| Bax | 0.64 (-0.92, 2.21) | 0.218 | ||
| Fas | -0.81 (-1.58, -0.05) | 0.045∗ | ||
| Bcl-2 | -0.91 (-6.80, 4.96) | 0.570 | ||
| Fas∗Bcl-2 | 0.19 (0.03, 0.34) | 0.036∗ | ||
| P53∗Bcl-2 | -0.01 (-0.14, 0.11) | 0.646 | ||
| Bax∗Bcl-2 | -0.10 (-0.45, 0.25) | 0.342 | ||
| Intercept | 1.10 (-23.37, 25.57) |
∗Significant at 0.05 (it is also the interaction sign in the first column). SE: standard error.
Figure 5Coefficient plot of general linear model for +∆CTs of the genes. Model 1: multiple adjusted model. Model 2: multiple adjusted model with interaction of target genes with Bcl-2.