| Literature DB >> 33029491 |
Jingyi Xu1, Zuowei Pei1, Meng Yu1, Xiang Li1, Lu Wang1, Yichen Lin1, Xinyan Chen1, Xiaodan Liu1.
Abstract
A number of metabolic disorders, including hyperlipidemia, potentially cause chronic kidney disease (CKD), one of their major chronic complications and comorbidities. Rosuvastatin is one of the widely used antiatherogenic drugs among hyperlipidemic patients. Meanwhile, sarpogrelate is not only a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist but also an antiplatelet agent, inhibiting platelet-stimulated blood coagulation and improving peripheral circulation. In this study, a combination of sarpogrelate and/or rosuvastatin was used on CKD mice induced by a high-fat diet for 8 weeks. The mice were tested for pathological changes using histological evaluation. Tremendous alterations were found, including a remarked increase in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, glomerular endothelial proliferation, and mesangial expansion. Also, tubular damage and extracellular matrix accumulation occurred, namely, a marked increase in the macula densa, scattered and apoptotic loss of the apical brush border with vacuolated basophilic cytoplasm and heavily stained nuclei, and expanded Bowman's space, which were at least partially ameliorated by sarpogrelate and/or rosuvastatin treatment. The analysis of expression profiles at both the RNA and protein levels, using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis, indicated that LDL-R/CD68/LOX-1-positive monocyte/macrophage-mediated enhanced proinflammatory activation, including the significant upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6, was actually attenuated by sarpogrelate and/or rosuvastatin treatment. The findings indicated that sarpogrelate and/or rosuvastatin treatment potentially ameliorates CKD progression in patients with the aforementioned comorbid metabolic disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33029491 PMCID: PMC7537702 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1809326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Oligonucleotide primer sequences.
| LOX-1, lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1: |
| F: 5′-CAAAGTCTCCCAACCAACCTGCAA-3′ |
| R: 5′-ACATCCTGTCTTTCATGCGGCAAC-3′ |
| LDL-R, the low-density lipoprotein receptor: |
| F: 5′-TTGGGTTGATTCCAAACTCCAT-3′ |
| R: 5′-CCGATTGCCCCCATTGA-3′ |
| CD36, cluster of differentiation 36, also known as scavenger receptor class B member 3 (SCARB3): |
| F: 5′-CCTTAAAGGAATCCCCGTGT-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGCATTTGCCAATGTCTAGC-3′ |
| ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette transporter A1: |
| F: 5′-AGCCAGAAGGGAGTGTCAGA-3′ |
| R: 5′-CATGCCATCTGGGTAAACCT-3′ |
| TNF- |
| F: 5′-TCTCATGCACCACCATCAAGGACT-3′ |
| R: 5′-ACCACTCTCCCTTTGCAGAACTCA-3′ |
| IL-6, interleukin-6: |
| F: 5′-TACCAGTTGCCTTCTTGGGACTGA-3′ |
| R: 5′-TAAGCCTCCGACTTGTGAAGTGGT-3′ |
|
|
| F: 5′-CGATGCCCTGAGGGTCTTT-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGGATGCCACAGGATTCCAT-3′ |
Figure 1Morphological assessment of kidney tissue under each condition using H&E staining. Using conventional H&E staining, coronal sections of the kidney tissues were used for the histological evaluation of pathological changes in mice randomly divided into four groups: ApoE−/− mice fed a normal diet (ApoE−/− ND), ApoE−/− mice fed a high-cholesterol diet (ApoE−/− HD), ApoE−/− mice fed rosuvastatin calcium+a high-cholesterol diet (ApoE−/− HD+R), and ApoE−/− mice fed rosuvastatin calcium+sarpogrelate+a high-cholesterol diet (ApoE−/− HD+R+S), all for 8 weeks (n = 6 in each group).
Figure 2Detection of changes in expression levels of proinflammatory genes and pathological heterogeneity under each condition. (a) Relative mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-6 was evaluated by qPCR in the kidney tissues of mice following an 8-week treatment under each condition (n = 6 in each group). (b) Representative images and quantification of immunohistochemistry showing the CD68 expression level in kidney tissues of mice following an 8-week treatment under each condition. Scale bar, 200 mm (n = 3–4 in each group). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM; ∗P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD, #P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD+R.
Figure 3Detection of alterations of lipid homeostasis and pathological heterogeneity under each condition. (a) Relative mRNA expression of LDL-R, CD36, LOX-1, and ABCA1 was evaluated by qPCR in the kidney tissues of mice following an 8-week treatment under each condition (n = 6 in each group). (b) Representative images and quantifications of Western blot analysis showing the LOX-1 expression level in kidney tissues of mice following an 8-week treatment under each condition. Scale bar, 200 mm (n = 3–4 in each group). (c) Representative images and quantification of immunohistochemistry showing the LOX-1 expression level in kidney tissues of mice following an 8-week treatment under each condition. Scale bar, 200 mm (n = 3–4 in each group). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM; ∗P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD, #P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD+R.
Metabolic data.
| ApoE−/− ND | ApoE−/− HD | ApoE−/− HD+R | ApoE−/− HD+R+S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 30 ± 2.65 | 28.4 ± 2.61 | 29.5 ± 2.35 | 29.5 ± 1.52 |
| Kidney/body weight ratio (mg g−1) | 6.45 ± 0.1 | 7.22 ± 0.86 | 6.98 ± 0.87 | 7.04 ± 1.13 |
| TC (mg dL−1) | 9.7 ± 0.68∗# | 102.33 ± 8.17 | 78.28 ± 21.25 | 40.9 ± 184∗# |
| TG (mg dL−1) | 2.87 ± 0.85 | 3.13 ± 0.81 | 2.08 ± 0.39 | 1.4 ± 0.28 |
| LDL-c (mg dL−1) | 3.95 ± 0.32∗# | 17.9 ± 0.07 | 14.7 ± 2.12 | 10.33 ± 0.18∗ |
The mice were randomly divided into four groups: ApoE−/− mice fed a normal diet (ApoE−/− ND), ApoE−/− mice fed a high-cholesterol diet (ApoE−/− HD), ApoE−/− mice fed rosuvastatin calcium+a high-cholesterol diet (ApoE−/− HD+R), and ApoE−/− mice fed rosuvastatin calcium+sarpogrelate+a high-cholesterol diet (ApoE−/− HD+R+S). After the sacrifice following an 8-week treatment, the kidney weight and the total body weight of the mice from each group were measured and recorded. Blood samples were obtained from their inferior vena cava and collected. The levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) were measured with an autoanalyzer system. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6 in each group). ∗P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD, #P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD+R.