Literature DB >> 33029044

Mathematical modeling of glenoid bone loss demonstrate differences in calculations that May affect surgical decision making.

Stephen A Parada1, Matthew C Jones1, Mikalyn T DeFoor2, B Gage Griswold1, Aaron D Roberts3, Matthew T Provencher4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Two glenoid bone loss calculations are compared across a range of anatomic glenoid sizes.
METHODS: 20 cadaveric paired glenoid diameters were measured to create glenoid models with bone loss calculated in 1 mm linear increments up to 50% bone loss comparing the linear measurement percentage (LMP) to the circle line method (CLM) gold standard.
RESULTS: The LMP overestimates glenoid bone loss at every potential 1 mm increment across each glenoid model until bone loss reaches 50%.
CONCLUSION: The widely-used LMP method overestimates bone loss compared to a gold standard potentially misguiding surgeons towards bony reconstruction in shoulder instability during preoperative planning.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Circle line method (CLM); Glenoid bone loss; Linear measurement percentage (LMP); Mathematical modeling; Shoulder instability

Year:  2020        PMID: 33029044      PMCID: PMC7527674          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  28 in total

1.  Area-based determination of bone loss using the glenoid arc angle.

Authors:  Guillaume D Dumont; Robert D Russell; Michael G Browne; William J Robertson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Charles Nofsinger; Benjamin Browning; Stephen S Burkhart; Robert A Pedowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Anup A Shah; R Bryan Butler; James Romanowski; Danny Goel; Dimitrios Karadagli; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Effect of an anterior glenoid defect on anterior shoulder stability: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Eiji Itoi; Hidekazu Abe; Kazuma Kikuchi; Nobutoshi Seki; Hiroshi Minagawa; Yilihamu Tuoheti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from "engaging/non-engaging" lesion to "on-track/off-track" lesion.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Giacomo; Eiji Itoi; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Glenoid diameter is an inaccurate method for percent glenoid bone loss quantification: analysis and techniques for improved accuracy.

Authors:  Sanjeev Bhatia; Anil Saigal; Rachel M Frank; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Comparison of various imaging techniques to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability.

Authors:  Michael A Rerko; Xueliang Pan; Chris Donaldson; Grant L Jones; Julie Y Bishop
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Julie Y Bishop; Grant L Jones; Michael A Rerko; Chris Donaldson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  How to identify and calculate glenoid bone deficit.

Authors:  P Baudi; P Righi; D Bolognesi; S Rivetta; E Rossi Urtoler; N Guicciardi; M Carrara
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun

10.  Redefining "Critical" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Functional Outcomes Worsen With "Subcritical" Bone Loss.

Authors:  James S Shaha; Jay B Cook; Daniel J Song; Douglas J Rowles; Craig R Bottoni; Steven H Shaha; John M Tokish
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

1.  Arthroscopic repair is sufficient for treating recurrent shoulder instability in patients with bipolar bone defects and minor glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Andrew Chia Chen Chou; Benjamin Joseph Kang; Aaron Junjie Tan; Denny Tijauw Tjoen Lie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.