| Literature DB >> 33028670 |
Luuk Heckman1, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman2, Justin Luermans3,4, Antonius M W Stipdonk3, Floor Salden3, Alexander H Maass5, Frits W Prinzen1, Kevin Vernooy6,4.
Abstract
The adverse effects of ventricular dyssynchrony induced by right ventricular (RV) pacing has led to alternative pacing strategies, such as biventricular, His bundle (HBP), LV septal (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Given the overlap, LVSP and LBBP are also collectively referred to as left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Although among these alternative pacing sites HBP is theoretically the ideal strategy as it maintains a physiological ventricular activation, its application requires more skills and is associated with the most complications. LBBAP, where the ventricular pacing lead is advanced through the interventricular septum to its left side, creates ventricular activation that is only slightly more dyssynchronous. Preliminary studies have shown that LBBAP is feasible, safe and encounters less limitations than HBP. Further studies are needed to differentiate between LVSP and LBBP with regard to acute functional and long-term clinical outcome. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: bradyarrhythmias; pacemakers
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33028670 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart ISSN: 1355-6037 Impact factor: 5.994