Literature DB >> 33028586

Physical activity is good for older adults-but is programme implementation being overlooked? A systematic review of intervention studies that reported frameworks or measures of implementation.

Samantha M Gray1, Heather A McKay2,3, Lindsay Nettlefold1, Douglas Race1, Heather M Macdonald1,3, Patti-Jean Naylor4, Joanie Sims-Gould1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine older adult physical activity (PA) intervention studies that evaluated implementation and/or scale-up. Research question 1: What implementation and/or scale-up indicators (specific, observable and measurable characteristics that show the progress of implementation) were reported? Research question 2: What implementation and/or scale-up frameworks were reported? Research question 3: Did studies evaluate the relationship between implementation or scale-up of the intervention and individual level health/behaviour outcomes? If yes, how?
DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Publications from electronic databases and hand searches (2000 to December 2019). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Any PA intervention studies with community-dwelling older adult participants (mean age ≥60 years). Required indicators: (a) Must report amount of PA as an outcome, with validated self-report or objective measures, and (b) Must have reported at least one implementation or scale-up framework and/or one implementation or scale-up indicator.
RESULTS: 137 studies were included for research question 1, 11 for question 2 and 22 for question 3. 137 studies reported an implementation indicator: 14 unique indicators. None were specified as indicators for scale-up evaluation. 11 studies were guided by an implementation or scale-up framework. 22 studies described a relationship between an implementation indicator and an individual-level health outcome.
CONCLUSION: There is need for implementation research that extends beyond analysis at the individual level, includes clearly defined indicators and provides a guiding framework to support PA initiatives in older adults. Such implementation studies should evaluate factors in the broader context (eg,political, environmental) that influence scale-up. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42018091839. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implementation; physical activity; review; senior

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33028586     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  2 in total

Review 1.  Impact of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a rapid review.

Authors:  Marina B Pinheiro; Juliana S Oliveira; Jennifer N Baldwin; Leanne Hassett; Nathalia Costa; Heidi Gilchrist; Belinda Wang; Wing Kwok; Bruna S Albuquerque; Luiza R Pivotto; Ana Paula M C Carvalho-Silva; Sweekriti Sharma; Steven Gilbert; Adrian Bauman; Fiona C Bull; Juana Willumsen; Catherine Sherrington; Anne Tiedemann
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 8.915

2.  "People Associate Us with Movement so It's an Awesome Opportunity": Perspectives from Physiotherapists on Promoting Physical Activity, Exercise and Sport.

Authors:  Kerry West; Kate Purcell; Abby Haynes; Jennifer Taylor; Leanne Hassett; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.