Literature DB >> 33028480

Mentorship for Addiction Problems (MAP): A New Behavioral Intervention to Assist in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders.

Kathlene Tracy1, Leah Wachtel1, Emily Goldmann2, Joseph Nissenfeld3, Mark Burton3, Marc Galanter3, Samuel A Ball4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mentorship for Addiction Problems (MAP) is a new behavioral treatment formalizing client-to-client mentorship relationships as an adjunct to standard outpatient substance use disorder treatment. We tested the preliminary efficacy of MAP in reducing substance use and associated barriers to successful treatment outcomes.
METHOD: A total of 65 participants (17 later recovery participants [LRPs] and 48 early recovery participants [ERPs]) with substance use disorders were randomized to MAP + Treatment as Usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Within MAP, for each cohort, a pool of 4-5 mentors (LRPs) was formed and engaged in mentoring activities for 24 weeks until 12-13 mentees (ERPs), newly admitted, had participated in MAP for 12 weeks. Behavioral and biological measures were conducted at baseline, weekly, monthly, and termination for all participants and during the 12-week follow-up for ERPs.
RESULTS: Substance use declined across both conditions for ERPs (N = 48) during treatment, Weeks 0-12 (p = .001); however, on average, ERPs in the MAP intervention used significantly fewer days than controls during Treatment Weeks 1-12 (p = .013) and during Follow-Up Weeks 13-24 (p = .043). Addiction Severity Index alcohol and drug use scores increased in TAU and decreased in MAP during Follow-Up Weeks 13-24 for ERPs, alcohol: b = -0.08, SE = 0.03, t(47) = -2.97, p = .005; drug use: b = -0.02, SE = 0.01, t(47) = -2.36, p = .023. In addition, there was high patient interest in MAP and good fidelity to delivery of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: MAP shows promise assisting in the reduction of substance use early in treatment when vulnerability and risk for relapse is high and has a positive impact on serious problems undercutting addiction treatment efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33028480      PMCID: PMC8076492     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  37 in total

1.  Atheists, agnostics and Alcoholics Anonymous.

Authors:  J Scott Tonigan; W R Miller; Carol Schermer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2002-09

2.  Natural mentoring relationships and adolescent health: evidence from a national study.

Authors:  David L DuBois; Naida Silverthorn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Predictors of successful completion of a halfway-house program for chemically-dependent women.

Authors:  R F Huselid; E A Self; S E Gutierres
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Improvements in the community-reinforcement approach to alcoholism.

Authors:  N H Azrin
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1976

5.  A modified therapeutic community for the dually diagnosed. Greenhouse Program at Bellevue Hospital.

Authors:  L Westreich; M Galanter; H Lifshutz; E J Metzger; C Silberstein
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

6.  Stigma and social support in substance abuse: Implications for mental health and well-being.

Authors:  Michèle D Birtel; Lisa Wood; Nancy J Kempa
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  CDC grand rounds: prescription drug overdoses - a U.S. epidemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  A reinforcement-based therapeutic workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: six-month abstinence outcomes.

Authors:  K Silverman; D Svikis; E Robles; M L Stitzer; G E Bigelow
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media.

Authors:  J A Naslund; K A Aschbrenner; L A Marsch; S J Bartels
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 10.  Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: an evaluative review.

Authors:  D L Segal; M Hersen; V B Van Hasselt
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.735

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.