| Literature DB >> 33027192 |
Vincenzo Russo1, Giuseppe Cardillo2, Giuseppe Vito Viggiano3, Sara Mangiacapra4, Antonella Cavalli5, Andrea Fontanella6, Federica Agrusta3, Annamaria Bellizzi5, Maria Amitrano4, Mariateresa Iannuzzo6, Chiara Sacco7, Corrado Lodigiani7, Pierpaolo Di Micco6.
Abstract
The use of heparin has been shown to decrease the mortality in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with fondaparinux versus enoxaparin among 100 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The incidence of pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-MB, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and in-hospital mortality was compared between patients on fondaparinux versus enoxaparin therapy. The 2 groups were homogeneous for demographic, laboratory, and clinical characteristics. In a median follow-up of 28 (IQR: 12-45) days, no statistically significant difference in venous thromboembolism (14.5% vs. 5.3%; P = 0.20), MB and clinically relevant non-MB (3.2% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.76), ARDS (17.7% vs. 15.8%; P = 0.83), and in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.97) has been shown between the enoxaparin group versus the fondaparinux group. Our preliminary results support the hypothesis of a safe and effective use of fondaparinux among patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in internal medicine units.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33027192 DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ISSN: 0160-2446 Impact factor: 3.105