Literature DB >> 33026476

Evaluation of short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 80 years old: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Toshinori Sueda1, Mitsuyoshi Tei2, Kentaro Nishida2, Yukihiro Yoshikawa2, Tae Matsumura2, Chikato Koga2, Masaki Wakasugi2, Hiromichi Miyagaki2, Ryohei Kawabata2, Masanori Tsujie2, Junichi Hasegawa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It remains controversial whether the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are beneficial in elderly patients (EP, age ≥ 80 years). The present study aimed to evaluate whether age itself is an independent risk factor for laparoscopic surgery by comparing short- and long-term outcomes between non-EP and EP groups.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 730 consecutive patients with stage I-III CRC who had undergone elective surgery between 2010 and 2017, using propensity score-matched analysis.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 months. After matching, we enrolled 228 patients. In the matched cohort, estimated operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node dissection ≥ D3, number of lymph nodes harvested < 12, conversion rate, multivisceral resection rate, postoperative complication rate, and length of postsurgical stay were similar between the two groups. Before matching, compared with the non-EP group, the EP group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.01), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.01), and higher frequency of local recurrence (LR) (p = 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in terms of incidence of LR or CSS between the two groups in the matched cohort. Prior to matching, multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 80 years as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.01), CSS (p < 0.01), and RFS (p = 0.01); however, after matching, age ≥ 80 years was not an independent poor prognostic factor for OS or CCS.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery offers a safe, effective option for CRC in EP aged ≥ 80 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Elderly; Laparoscopic surgery; Oncological outcomes; Propensity score matching

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33026476     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03770-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.796


  25 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative risk assessment in elderly and high-risk patients.

Authors:  J David Richardson; Christine S Cocanour; John A Kern; R Neal Garrison; Orlando C Kirton; Joseph B Cofer; David A Spain; Michael H Thomason
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Reza; J A Blasco; E Andradas; R Cantero; J Mayol
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal surgery in old age: issues of equality and quality.

Authors:  D G Seymour
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Advances in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  James Michael Parker; Timothy F Feldmann; Kyle G Cologne
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes.

Authors:  Christos D Athanasiou; Jonathan Robinson; Marina Yiasemidou; Sonia Lockwood; Georgios A Markides
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients.

Authors:  J M Leung; S Dzankic
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.