Literature DB >> 33026457

Accuracy of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Image-Guided Breast Biopsy to Predict Residual Cancer.

Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis1, Han-Byoel Lee2,3,4, Wei Yang5, Romney Pope6, Savitri Krishnamurthy7, Soo-Yeon Kim8, Nariya Cho8, Victoria Teoh1, Gaiane M Rauch9, Benjamin D Smith10, Vicente Valero11, Kabir Mohammed12, Wonshik Han2,3,4, Fiona MacNeill1, Henry M Kuerer13.   

Abstract

Importance: Image-guided breast biopsy of a residual imaging abnormality or tumor bed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used to assess residual cancer, facilitate risk-adaptive surgery, and potentially identify exceptional responders in whom local therapy may be de-escalated. Objective: To further assess the accuracy of post-NACT image-guided biopsy to predict residual cancer in the breast. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study analyzed multicenter patient-level data of patients with breast cancer who were treated with NACT and underwent image-guided biopsy before surgery at Royal Marsden Hospital in London, UK; Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea; and MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. Data were analyzed from June to July 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic accuracy of post-NACT image-guided biopsy. Final surgical pathology was used as reference standard.
Results: Data from 166 women were analyzed. The median (range) age was 49 (25-76) years. The median (range) tumor size on pretreatment and posttreatment imaging was 33.5 (12-100) mm and 10 (0-100) mm, respectively. The overall pathologic complete response rate was 51.2% (n = 85) (16.1% [5 of 31] for hormone receptor-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative; 44.7% [21 of 47] for hormone receptor-positive/ERBB2-positive; 69% [20 of 29] for hormone receptor-negative/ERBB2-positive; and 66.1% [39 of 59] for triple negative). The majority (143 [86.1%]) underwent image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), and 23 had core-cut biopsy. The median (range) needle gauge was 10 (7-14), and the median (range) number of samples was 6 (2-18). When image-guided biopsy (VAB and core-cut biopsy) was representative (159 [95.8%]), the false-negative rate across the whole cohort was 18.7% (95% CI, 10.6%-29.3%). Subgroup analysis of patients with a complete/partial clinical response and residual imaging abnormality of 2 cm or smaller with at least 6 VABs taken (76 [45.8%]) demonstrated a false-negative rate of 3.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-16.7%), a negative predictive value of 97.4% (95% CI, 86.5%-99.9%), and an overall accuracy of 89.5% (95% CI, 80.3%-95.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: This large multicenter pooled data analysis suggests that a standardized protocol using image-guided VAB of a tumor bed measuring 2 cm or smaller with 6 or more representative samples allows reliable prediction of residual disease. These results could inform the design of de-escalation trials in NACT exceptional responders testing the safety of eliminating surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33026457      PMCID: PMC7542519          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  7 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: The Ultimate "Spy".

Authors:  Carla Suzanne Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 2.  A review of studies on omitting surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kexin Feng; Ziqi Jia; Gang Liu; Zeyu Xing; Jiayi Li; Jiaxin Li; Fei Ren; Jiang Wu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.942

3.  A qualitative study to evaluate physician attitudes regarding omission of surgery among exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer (NRG-CC006).

Authors:  Laila A Gharzai; Lauren A Szczygiel; Dean A Shumway; Hanna Bandos; Thomas B Julian; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Julia White; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Mark Basik; Patricia A Ganz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Tina J Hieken; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Avoiding breast cancer surgery in a select cohort of complete responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Anuradha Apte; Simon Marsh; Sankaran Chandrasekharan; Arunmoy Chakravorty
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 6.  Breast and axillary surgery after neoadjuvant systemic treatment - A review of clinical routine recommendations and the latest clinical research.

Authors:  André Pfob; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  De-escalating Surgery Among Patients with HER2 + and Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Marios-Konstantinos Tasoulis; Joerg Heil; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2022-07-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.