Literature DB >> 33026274

The association between maternal human papillomavirus (HPV) experiences and HPV vaccination of their children.

Erika Biederman1, Kelly Donahue2, Lynne Sturm3, Victoria Champion1, Gregory Zimet2.   

Abstract

HPV vaccination prevents most HPV-related cancers yet vaccination rates remain low. In this cross-sectional study, we examined the association between maternal HPV experiences and HPV vaccination uptake among children and whether this association may be explained by perceived benefits of vaccination. We used logistic regression models to estimate the effect of (1) maternal history of abnormal Pap smear, (2), family/friend history of cervical cancer, and (3) maternal history of cervical cancer on HPV vaccination uptake among children. Separate mediation analyses were conducted to determine if perceived benefits mediated the relationship between each maternal HPV experience and HPV vaccination uptake. History of abnormal Pap smear (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.97), family history of cervical cancer (OR = 1.72, CI = 1.26, 2.35), and personal history of cervical cancer (OR = 3.00, CI = 1.82, 4.95) predicted HPV vaccination of children. Perceived benefits mediated the relationship between history of abnormal Pap smear (indirect effect =.146, SE =.069, 95% CI =.014, .289), family history of cervical cancer (indirect effect =.228, SE =.079, CI =.080, .387), and personal history of cervical cancer (indirect effect =.298, SE =.116, CI =.082, .533) on HPV vaccination. Our results suggest that personal experiences with HPV-related disease may influence maternal HPV vaccine decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination; cervical cancer history; perceived benefits

Year:  2020        PMID: 33026274      PMCID: PMC8018340          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1817714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

1.  A national study of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls: rates, predictors, and reasons for non-vaccination.

Authors:  Laura M Kester; Gregory D Zimet; J Dennis Fortenberry; Jessica A Kahn; Marcia L Shew
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

2.  Why do low-income minority parents choose human papillomavirus vaccination for their daughters?

Authors:  Rebecca B Perkins; Natalie Pierre-Joseph; Cecilia Marquez; Sandra Iloka; Jack A Clark
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine.

Authors:  Xiaoli Nan; Michael F Dahlstrom; Adam Richards; Sarani Rangarajan
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2014-07-25

4.  Parent perceptions important for HPV vaccine initiation among low income adolescent girls.

Authors:  Stephanie A S Staras; Susan T Vadaparampil; Roshni P Patel; Elizabeth A Shenkman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Parents' decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: I. Quantitative results.

Authors:  Andrea Krawczyk; Bärbel Knäuper; Vladimir Gilca; Eve Dubé; Samara Perez; Keven Joyal-Desmarais; Zeev Rosberger
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Factors associated with parents' attitudes to the HPV vaccination of their adolescent sons : A systematic review.

Authors:  Gorjana Radisic; Janine Chapman; Ingrid Flight; Carlene Wilson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Relationship between maternal experiences and adolescent HPV vaccination.

Authors:  Abbey B Berenson; V Gnaukita Brown; Erika L Fuchs; Jacqueline M Hirth; Mihyun Chang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake in teenage girls: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sharon J M Kessels; Helen S Marshall; Maureen Watson; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Rob Reuzel; Rebecca L Tooher
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  School-based vaccination of young US males: impact of health beliefs on intent and first dose acceptance.

Authors:  Vaughn I Rickert; Beth A Auslander; Dena S Cox; Susan L Rosenthal; Jeffrey A Rickert; Richard Rupp; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  The Health Belief Model: a decade later.

Authors:  N K Janz; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1984
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.