Mads D Lyhne1,2,3, Christopher Kabrhel1, Nicholas Giordano1, Asger Andersen2, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk2, Hui Zheng4, David M Dudzinski1,3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Vascular Emergencies, Massachusetts General Hospital, 0 Emerson Place, MA 02114, USA. 2. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. 3. Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 4. Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Right ventricular (RV) failure causes death from acute pulmonary embolism (PE), due to a mismatch between RV systolic function and increased RV afterload. We hypothesized that an echocardiographic ratio of this mismatch [RV systolic function by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) divided by pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP)] would predict adverse outcomes better than each measurement individually, and would be useful for risk stratification in intermediate-risk PE. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective analysis of a single academic centre Pulmonary Embolism Response Team registry from 2012 to 2019. All patients with confirmed PE and a formal transthoracic echocardiogram performed within 2 days were included. All echocardiograms were analysed by an observer blinded to the outcome. The primary endpoint was a 7-day composite outcome of death or haemodynamic deterioration. Secondary outcomes were 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality. A total of 627 patients were included; 135 met the primary composite outcome. In univariate analysis, the TAPSE/PASP was associated with our primary outcome [odds ratio = 0.028, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.010-0.087; P < 0.0001], which was significantly better than either TAPSE or PASP alone (P = 0.017 and P < 0.0001, respectively). A TAPSE/PASP cut-off value of 0.4 was identified as the optimal value for predicting adverse outcome in PE. TAPSE/PASP predicted both 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality, while TAPSE and PASP did not. CONCLUSION: A combined echocardiographic ratio of RV function to afterload is superior in prediction of adverse outcome in acute intermediate-risk PE. This ratio may improve risk stratification and identification of the patients that will suffer short-term deterioration after intermediate-risk PE. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Right ventricular (RV) failure causes death from acute pulmonary embolism (PE), due to a mismatch between RV systolic function and increased RV afterload. We hypothesized that an echocardiographic ratio of this mismatch [RV systolic function by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) divided by pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP)] would predict adverse outcomes better than each measurement individually, and would be useful for risk stratification in intermediate-risk PE. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective analysis of a single academic centre Pulmonary Embolism Response Team registry from 2012 to 2019. All patients with confirmed PE and a formal transthoracic echocardiogram performed within 2 days were included. All echocardiograms were analysed by an observer blinded to the outcome. The primary endpoint was a 7-day composite outcome of death or haemodynamic deterioration. Secondary outcomes were 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality. A total of 627 patients were included; 135 met the primary composite outcome. In univariate analysis, the TAPSE/PASP was associated with our primary outcome [odds ratio = 0.028, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.010-0.087; P < 0.0001], which was significantly better than either TAPSE or PASP alone (P = 0.017 and P < 0.0001, respectively). A TAPSE/PASP cut-off value of 0.4 was identified as the optimal value for predicting adverse outcome in PE. TAPSE/PASP predicted both 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality, while TAPSE and PASP did not. CONCLUSION: A combined echocardiographic ratio of RV function to afterload is superior in prediction of adverse outcome in acute intermediate-risk PE. This ratio may improve risk stratification and identification of the patients that will suffer short-term deterioration after intermediate-risk PE. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.