Literature DB >> 33025823

The Effect of Various, Everyday Practices on Glucose Levels in Critically Ill Children.

Eleni Tsotridou1, Eirini Kotzapanagiotou2, Asimina Violaki2, Meropi Dimitriadou1, Menelaos Svirkos2, Peristera-Eleni Mantzafleri2, Vasiliki Papadopoulou2, Maria Sdougka2, Athanasios Christoforidis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of various, everyday intensive care unit (ICU) practices on glucose levels in critically ill pediatric patients with the use of a continuous glucose monitoring system.
METHODS: Seventeen sensors were placed in 16 pediatric patients (8 male). All therapeutic and diagnostic interventions were recorded and 15 minutes later, a flash glucose measurement was obtained by swiping the sensor with a reader. Glucose difference was calculated as the glucose value 15 minutes after the intervention minus the mean daily glucose value for each individual patient. Additionally, the consciousness status of the patient (awake or sedated) was recorded.
RESULTS: Two hundred and five painful skin interventions were recorded. The mean difference of glucose values was higher by 1.84 ± 14.76 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.19 to 3.87 mg/dL, P = .076). However, when patients were categorized regarding their consciousness level, mean glucose difference was significantly higher in awake state than in sedated patients (4.76 ± 28.07 vs -2.21 ± 15.77 mg/dL, P < .001). Six hundred forty-nine interventions involving the respiratory system were recorded. Glucose difference during washings proved to be significantly higher than the ones during simple suctions (4.74 ± 14.18 mg/dL vs 0.32 ± 18.22 mg/dL, P = .016). Finally, glucose difference in awake patients was higher by 3.66 ± 13.91 mg/dL compared to glucose difference of -2.25 ± 21.07 mg/dL obtained during respiratory intervention in sedated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the ICU, especially when performed in an awake state, exacerbate the stress and lead to a significant rise in glucose levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; continuous glucose monitoring; flash glucose monitoring; hyperglycemia; intensive care unit; stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33025823      PMCID: PMC8875055          DOI: 10.1177/1932296820959315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  40 in total

Review 1.  Stress hyperglycemia in pediatric critical illness: the intensive care unit adds to the stress!

Authors:  Vijay Srinivasan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

2.  Energy imbalance and the risk of overfeeding in critically ill children.

Authors:  Nilesh M Mehta; Lori J Bechard; Melanie Dolan; Katelyn Ariagno; Hongyu Jiang; Christopher Duggan
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Association of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glucose variability with morbidity and death in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kupper A Wintergerst; Bruce Buckingham; Laura Gandrud; Becky J Wong; Saraswati Kache; Darrell M Wilson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Dysglycemia in critically ill children.

Authors:  Halla Kamińska; Paweł Wieczorek; Eliza Skała-Zamorowska; Grażyna Deja; Przemysława Jarosz-Chobot
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2016

5.  A protocolized approach to identify and manage hyperglycemia in a pediatric critical care unit.

Authors:  Catherine M Preissig; Inger Hansen; Pei-Ling Roerig; Mark R Rigby
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Hyperglycemia is associated with morbidity in critically ill children with meningococcal sepsis.

Authors:  Kerry M Day; Nadja Haub; Helen Betts; David P Inwald
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Hyperglycemia and infections in pediatric trauma patients.

Authors:  David W Tuggle; M Ann Kuhn; Susan K Jones; Jennifer J Garza; Sean Skinner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  An alternative sensor-based method for glucose monitoring in children and young people with diabetes.

Authors:  Julie Edge; Carlo Acerini; Fiona Campbell; Julian Hamilton-Shield; Chris Moudiotis; Shakeel Rahman; Tabitha Randell; Anne Smith; Nicola Trevelyan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Etiology of hyperglycemia in critically ill children and the impact of organ dysfunction.

Authors:  Seham Awad El-Sherbini; Huda Marzouk; Riham El-Sayed; Sarah Hosam-ElDin
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018 Jul-Sept

Review 10.  Flash Glucose Monitoring: A Review of the Literature with a Special Focus on Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Giulia Mancini; Maria Giulia Berioli; Elisa Santi; Francesco Rogari; Giada Toni; Giorgia Tascini; Roberta Crispoldi; Giulia Ceccarini; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.