Literature DB >> 33025681

Funding of prostate magnetic resonance imaging leads to fewer biopsies and potential savings to health systems in the management of prostate cancer.

Thomas Whish-Wilson1,2, Daniel Costello1,2, Sue Finch3, Tom Sutherland2,4, Lih-Ming Wong1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (mpMRIp) on the number of prostate biopsies performed in Australia.
METHODS: Australian Medicare published statistics from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2019 were obtained from publically available databases for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, prostate biopsy, and mpMRIp. Analysis was divided into three time periods broadly based on availability of mpMRI to the Australian public: 2007-2012 (no mpMRIp), 2012-2018 (mpMRIp available, privately funded), and 2018-2019 (mpMRIp available with Medicare funding). Introduction of mpMRIp was hypothesised to reduce the number of prostate biopsies performed. PSA testing numbers were used as a control. The economics model, proposed by the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC), was analysed for cost savings.
RESULTS: Accounting for variations in PSA testing, the introduction of mpMRIp from 2012 coincided with a reduction in the number of prostate biopsies by an average of 354.7/month (95% CI 175, 534.4; P < 0.001). Whilst the number of mpMRIp performed for the initial 12 months was underestimated by the MSAC at 38 470 vs 20 149 (+$8.3 million Australian dollars), we estimate the annual savings from reduced number biopsies and biopsy-associated complications to be $13.2 ± 9.6 million.
CONCLUSION: Availability of mpMRIp in Australia has correlated with a significant reduction in prostate biopsy rates, with an estimated annual saving of $13.2 ± 9.6 million. Government funding of this diagnostic service has the potential to improve health equity and save on health expenditure.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; health policy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33025681     DOI: 10.1111/bju.15231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  2 in total

1.  Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on early detection of prostate cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Christopher C K Ip; Joshua Kealey; Ian D Davis; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.969

2.  PEDAL protocol: a prospective single-arm paired comparison of multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCPFyl PSMA PET/CT to diagnose prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vy Tran; Anne Hong; Tom Sutherland; Kim Taubman; Su-Faye Lee; Daniel Lenaghan; Kapil Sethi; Niall M Corcoran; Nathan Lawrentschuk; H Woo; Lisa Tarlinton; Damien Bolton; Tim Spelman; Lauren Thomas; Russell Booth; Justin Hegarty; Elisa Perry; Lih-Ming Wong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.