Literature DB >> 33025097

An easy way to determine bone mineral density and predict pelvic insufficiency fractures in patients treated with radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Drilon Kurrumeli1,2, Markus Oechsner1, Bianca Weidenbächer1, Christine Brambs3, Maximilian Löffler4, Stephanie Elisabeth Combs1,5,6, Kai Borm1, Marciana Nona Duma7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) as measured in planning computed tomographies (CTs) by a new method is a risk factor for pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) after radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T) for cervical cancer.
METHODS: 62 patients with cervical cancer who received definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed. The PIF were detected on follow-up magntic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI of the PIF patients was registered to the planning CT and the PIF contoured. On the contralateral side of the fracture, a mirrored structure of the fracture was generated (mPIF). For the whole sacral bone, three lumbar vertebrae, the first and second sacral vertebrae, and the PIF, we analyzed the BMD (mg/cm3), V50Gy, Dmean, and Dmax.
RESULTS: Out of 62 patients, 6 (9.7%) had a fracture. Two out of the 6 patients had a bilateral fracture with only one of them being symptomatic. PIF patients showed a significantly lower BMD in the sacral and the lumbar vertebrae (p < 0.05). The BMD of the contoured PIF, however, when comparing to the mPIF, did not reach significance (p < 0.49). The difference of the V50Gy of the sacrum in the PIF group compared to the other (OTH) patients, i.e. those without PIF, did not reach significance.
CONCLUSION: The dose does not seem to have a relevant impact on the incidence of PIF in our patients. One of the predisposing factors for developing PIF after radiotherapy seems to be the low BMD. We presented an easy method to assess the BMD in planning CTs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cisplatinum; Gynaecological tumors; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiation therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33025097     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01690-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  2 in total

1.  Radiation oncology as part of medical education-current status and possible digital future prospects.

Authors:  Hendrik Dapper; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Salome Rathfelder; Katharina Mosene; Isabelle von Kirchbauer; Denise Bernhardt; Pascal O Berberat; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for cervical cancer: Comparison of clinical results with special consideration of the influence of patient- and treatment-related parameters.

Authors:  Leif Hendrik Dröge; Franziska-Felicitas von Sivers; Markus Anton Schirmer; Hendrik Andreas Wolff
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.621

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.