BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation remains the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, due to high recurrence rates, especially in patients with persistent AF, PV antral isolation, complemented by linear ablation, autonomic modulation, and ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, have been attempted to increase the odds of success. However, the optimum approach for a complementary strategy in addition to PVI for persistent AF is unknown. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized trial by assigning 92 patients with persistent AF in 1:1 ratio to pulmonary-vein isolation plus ablation of electrograms showing complex fractionated activity (45 patients), or pulmonary-vein isolation plus additional linear ablation across the left atrial roof and mitral valve isthmus (47 patients). The duration of follow-up was five years. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation after a single ablation procedure. RESULTS: At a 12-month follow-up, 9 (23%) patients had AF recurrence in the linear ablation and 8 (21%) patients in the CFAE groups. At a mean follow-up duration of 59±36 months, 48.3% of patients in the linear ablation group and 44.6% of patients in the CFAE group were free from AF (p=0.403). There were no significant differences between the two groups for independent predictors of freedom from AF. The overall procedure time and radiation exposure were higher in the PVI+linear ablation group. There were five adverse events noted, two in the linear group (pericardial effusion not requiring drain) and 3 in the CFAE group (1 pseudoaneurysm, one effusion requiring pericardiocentesis and one effusion nor requiring drain). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, we found no difference in maintenance of sinus rhythm in either linear ablation or ablation of complex fractionated electrograms was performed in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in short- and long-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation remains the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, due to high recurrence rates, especially in patients with persistent AF, PV antral isolation, complemented by linear ablation, autonomic modulation, and ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, have been attempted to increase the odds of success. However, the optimum approach for a complementary strategy in addition to PVI for persistent AF is unknown. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized trial by assigning 92 patients with persistent AF in 1:1 ratio to pulmonary-vein isolation plus ablation of electrograms showing complex fractionated activity (45 patients), or pulmonary-vein isolation plus additional linear ablation across the left atrial roof and mitral valve isthmus (47 patients). The duration of follow-up was five years. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation after a single ablation procedure. RESULTS: At a 12-month follow-up, 9 (23%) patients had AF recurrence in the linear ablation and 8 (21%) patients in the CFAE groups. At a mean follow-up duration of 59±36 months, 48.3% of patients in the linear ablation group and 44.6% of patients in the CFAE group were free from AF (p=0.403). There were no significant differences between the two groups for independent predictors of freedom from AF. The overall procedure time and radiation exposure were higher in the PVI+linear ablation group. There were five adverse events noted, two in the linear group (pericardial effusion not requiring drain) and 3 in the CFAE group (1 pseudoaneurysm, one effusion requiring pericardiocentesis and one effusion nor requiring drain). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, we found no difference in maintenance of sinus rhythm in either linear ablation or ablation of complex fractionated electrograms was performed in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in short- and long-term follow-up.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial Fibrillation; Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation; Time Varying Risk; Valvular Heart Surgery
Authors: Hakan Oral; Carlo Pappone; Aman Chugh; Eric Good; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Eric R Bates; Michael H Lehmann; Gabriele Vicedomini; Giuseppe Augello; Eustachio Agricola; Simone Sala; Vincenzo Santinelli; Fred Morady Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Anthony G Brooks; Martin K Stiles; Julien Laborderie; Dennis H Lau; Pawel Kuklik; Nicholas J Shipp; Li-Fern Hsu; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Felipe Atienza; Jesús Almendral; José Miguel Ormaetxe; Angel Moya; Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday; Antonio Hernández-Madrid; Eduardo Castellanos; Fernando Arribas; Miguel Ángel Arias; Luis Tercedor; Rafael Peinado; Maria Fe Arcocha; Mercedes Ortiz; Nieves Martínez-Alzamora; Angel Arenal; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; José Jalife Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kelvin C K Wong; John R Paisey; Mark Sopher; Richard Balasubramaniam; Michael Jones; Norman Qureshi; Chris R Hayes; Matthew R Ginks; Kim Rajappan; Yaver Bashir; Timothy R Betts Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2015-08-17
Authors: Julia Vogler; Stephan Willems; Arian Sultan; Doreen Schreiber; Jakob Lüker; Helge Servatius; Benjamin Schäffer; Julia Moser; Boris A Hoffmann; Daniel Steven Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Kentaro Yoshida; Jean F Sarrazin; Michael Kuhne; Thomas Crawford; Nagib Chalfoun; Darryl Wells; Warangkna Boonyapisit; Srikar Veerareddy; Sreedhar Billakanty; Wai S Wong; Eric Good; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Pelosi; Frank Bogun; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Donald S Rubenstein; Benjamin B Holmes; Joseph A Manfredi; Matthew S McKillop; Peter C Netzler; Chad C Ward Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 1.759