| Literature DB >> 33024251 |
Hao-Nan Guo1,2, Li-Xia Wang3, Hong-Tao Liu4,5.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the relationship between key physicoEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33024251 PMCID: PMC7538424 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73894-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Changes in temperature (A), pH (B), electrical conductivity (C), and cation exchange capacity (D) during swine manure composting with different initial C/N ratios and bulking agent types. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments, while the same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). The error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 2Changes in organic matter (A), humic substances (B), humic acid/fulvic acid (C), dissolved organic matter (D), total nitrogen (E), and total phosphorus (F) during swine manure composting with different initial C/N ratios and bulking agent types. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments, while the same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). The error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 3Redistribution of Cd, As and Cr fractions during swine manure composting with different initial C/N ratios and bulking agent types. AcidExt acid extractable fraction, Red reducible fraction, Oxi oxidizable fraction, Res residual fraction.
Figure 4Redundancy analysis of physicochemical parameters and speciation of Cd, As and Cr during swine manure composting with different initial C/N ratios and bulking agent types. OM organic matter, EC electrical conductivity, CEC cation exchange capacity, T temperature, TP total phosphorus, TN total nitrogen, AcidExt acid extractable fraction, Red reducible fraction, Oxi oxidizable fraction, Res residual fraction.
Simple explanation quantity (SEQ) and conditional explanation quantity (CEQ) of physicochemical parameters on the redistribution of Cd, As and Cr fractions during swine manure composting with different initial C/N ratios and bulking agent types.
| Cd | As | Cr | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | SEQ (%) | CEQ (%) | Parameters | SEQ (%) | CEQ (%) | Parameters | SEQ (%) | CEQ (%) |
| TP | 37.4** | 37.4** | CEC | 49.8** | 49.8** | OM | 36.4** | 36.4** |
| TN | 30.9** | 11.1** | OM | 44.5** | 14.8** | CEC | 31.7** | 15.5** |
| pH | 12.1** | 9.0** | pH | 34.6** | 5.7** | EC | 12.2** | 10.3** |
| CEC | 31.4** | 6.9* | T | 27.2** | 4.7** | TP | 15.9** | 5.8** |
| EC | 5.0* | 5.7** | EC | 6.7** | 2.2 | pH | 25.4** | 2.5 |
| OM | 26.3* | 2.1 | TN | 7.5 | 1.1 | T | 12.0** | 1.5 |
| T | 13.9 | 0.7 | TP | 28.5 | 0.2 | TN | 9.1* | 0.3 |
*Statistically significant at the probability level 0.05.
**Statistically significant at the probability level 0.01.
Figure 5Network analysis shows the relationship between different components of organic matter and bioavailability of Cd, As and Cr during swine manure composting with different initial C/N ratios and bulking agent types. Connections between nodes represent significant correlation (p < 0.05) by Pearson's correlation model. The red and blue connections indicate positive and negative correlation, respectively. Elements with a larger node sizes have a greater relationship with the other components. OM organic matter, HS humic substances, HA/FA humic acid:fulvic acid ratio, DOM dissolved organic matter, AcidExt acid extractable fraction, BF bioavailability factor.
Physicochemical properties of composting raw materials (dry weight).
| Parameters | Swine manure | Rice straw | Green waste |
|---|---|---|---|
| OM (g/kg) | 782.22 ± 7.38 | 874.50 ± 10.94 | 667.01 ± 21.35 |
| TN (g/kg) | 33.60 ± 0.64 | 10.74 ± 0.12 | 7.84 ± 0.96 |
| TP (g/kg) | 15.8 ± 0.23 | 3.63 ± 0.10 | 2.94 ± 0.18 |
Figure 6Schematic diagram of the composting reactor.