Literature DB >> 33023947

Hypoxia Alters the Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy by Regulating EGFR Expression and Downstream Signaling in a DNA Methylation-Specific and HIF-Dependent Manner.

Mahelet Mamo1,2, I Chae Ye1,3, Josh W DiGiacomo1,3, Je Yeon Park1, Bradley Downs1, Daniele M Gilkes4,2,3,5.   

Abstract

Intratumoral hypoxia occurs in 90% of solid tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis for patients. Cancer cells respond to hypoxic microenvironments by activating the transcription factors, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) and HIF2. Here, we studied the unique gene expression patterns of 31 different breast cancer cell lines exposed to hypoxic conditions. The EGFR, a member of the ErbB (avian erythroblastosis oncogene B) family of receptors that play a role in cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and apoptosis, was induced in seven of the 31 breast cancer cell lines by hypoxia. A functional hypoxia response element (HRE) was identified, which is activated upon HIF1 binding to intron 18 of the EGFR gene in cell lines in which EGFR was induced by hypoxia. CpG methylation of the EGFR HRE prevented induction under hypoxic conditions. The HRE of EGFR was methylated in normal breast tissue and some breast cancer cell lines, and could be reversed by treatment with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors. Induction of EGFR under hypoxia led to an increase in AKT, ERK, and Rb phosphorylation as well as increased levels of cyclin D1, A, B1, and E2F, and repression of p21 in an HIF1α-dependent manner, leading to cell proliferation and migration. Also, increased EGFR expression sensitized cells to EGFR inhibitors. Collectively, our data suggest that patients with hypoxic breast tumors and hypomethylated EGFR status may benefit from EGFR inhibitors currently used in the clinic. SIGNIFICANCE: Hypoxia sensitizes breast cancer cells to EGFR inhibitors in an HIF1α- and a methylation-specific manner, suggesting patients with hypoxic tumors may benefit from EGFR inhibitors already available in the clinic. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/80/22/4998/F1.large.jpg. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33023947      PMCID: PMC7669740          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  50 in total

1.  DNA methylation represses the expression of the human erythropoietin gene by two different mechanisms.

Authors:  H Yin; K L Blanchard
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  DNA methylation and silencing of gene expression.

Authors:  J Newell-Price; A J Clark; P King
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 12.015

3.  Differential effects of EGF gradient profiles on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell chemotaxis.

Authors:  Shur-Jen Wang; Wajeeh Saadi; Francis Lin; Connie Minh-Canh Nguyen; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 4.  Epidermal growth factor receptor expression and measurement in solid tumors.

Authors:  David C Spaulding; Betsy O Spaulding
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Activation of Ras/PI3K/ERK pathway induces c-Myc stabilization to upregulate argininosuccinate synthetase, leading to arginine deiminase resistance in melanoma cells.

Authors:  Wen-Bin Tsai; Isamu Aiba; Yan Long; Hui-Kuan Lin; Lynn Feun; Niramol Savaraj; Macus Tien Kuo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The BAD protein integrates survival signaling by EGFR/MAPK and PI3K/Akt kinase pathways in PTEN-deficient tumor cells.

Authors:  Qing-Bai She; David B Solit; Qing Ye; Kathryn E O'Reilly; Jose Lobo; Neal Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 7.  Epidermal growth factor receptor in triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer: promising clinical target or only a marker?

Authors:  Monika L Burness; Tatyana A Grushko; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 8.  Hypoxia and cancer.

Authors:  M Christiane Brahimi-Horn; Johanna Chiche; Jacques Pouysségur
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Weighing tumor biology in treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Frances A Shepherd; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Expression of MUC17 is regulated by HIF1α-mediated hypoxic responses and requires a methylation-free hypoxia responsible element in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sho Kitamoto; Seiya Yokoyama; Michiyo Higashi; Norishige Yamada; Shyuichiro Matsubara; Sonshin Takao; Surinder K Batra; Suguru Yonezawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  LncRNA USP2-AS1 Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth by Enhancing YBX1-Mediated HIF1α Protein Translation Under Hypoxia.

Authors:  Shi-Ping Chen; Gui-Qi Zhu; Xiao-Xia Xing; Jing-Lei Wan; Jia-Liang Cai; Jun-Xian Du; Li-Na Song; Zhi Dai; Jian Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Both a hypoxia-inducible EYA3 and a histone acetyltransferase p300 function as coactivators of SIX5 to mediate tumorigenesis and cancer progression.

Authors:  Chunmei Yang; Hong Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

3.  RNA binding protein CUGBP1 mediates the liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by regulating the ErbB signal pathway.

Authors:  Zhi-Peng Qi; Zhang-Han Chen; Dong-Li He; Shi-Lun Cai; Bing Li; Di Sun; Zhen-Tao Lv; En-Pan Xu; Qiang Shi; Yun-Shi Zhong; Jian-Min Xu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  Rewired Cellular Metabolic Profiles in Response to Metformin under Different Oxygen and Nutrient Conditions.

Authors:  Shan Liu; Jumpei Washio; Satoko Sato; Yuki Abiko; Yuta Shinohara; Yuri Kobayashi; Haruki Otani; Shiori Sasaki; Xiaoyi Wang; Nobuhiro Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.