Brian K P Goh1, Mikel Prieto2, Nicholas Syn3, Ye-Xin Koh4, Jin-Yao Teo5, Ser-Yee Lee4, Alexander Y Chung5, Chung-Yip Chan4. 1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. Electronic address: bsgkp@hotmail.com. 2. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain. 3. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 4. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 5. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various difficulty scoring systems (DSS) have been formulated to grade the complexity of laparoscopic hepatectomies (LH). This study aims to externally validate and compare 4 contemporary DSS including the Iwate, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM), Southampton and Hasegawa DSS in predicting the intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes after LH. METHODS: Retrospective review of 548 consecutive patients who underwent LH of which 455 met the study inclusion criteria. Outcomes measures of technical difficulty included operation time, Pringles maneuver, blood loss and blood transfusion rate. Postoperative outcomes measured included morbidity, major morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant progressive increase in blood loss, blood transfusion rate, operation time and postoperative stay associated with all 4 DSS. There was also good calibration with respect to blood loss, operation time, Pringles maneuver, open conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, postoperative major morbidity and postoperative stay for all 4 DSS. The Southampton score demonstrated the poorest calibration in terms of operation time and discrimination in terms of application of Pringles maneuver and major morbidity amongst all 4 systems. CONCLUSION: All 4 DSS significantly correlated with outcome measures associated with intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes. The Southampton DSS was the poorest system in our cohort of patients.
BACKGROUND: Various difficulty scoring systems (DSS) have been formulated to grade the complexity of laparoscopic hepatectomies (LH). This study aims to externally validate and compare 4 contemporary DSS including the Iwate, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM), Southampton and Hasegawa DSS in predicting the intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes after LH. METHODS: Retrospective review of 548 consecutive patients who underwent LH of which 455 met the study inclusion criteria. Outcomes measures of technical difficulty included operation time, Pringles maneuver, blood loss and blood transfusion rate. Postoperative outcomes measured included morbidity, major morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant progressive increase in blood loss, blood transfusion rate, operation time and postoperative stay associated with all 4 DSS. There was also good calibration with respect to blood loss, operation time, Pringles maneuver, open conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, postoperative major morbidity and postoperative stay for all 4 DSS. The Southampton score demonstrated the poorest calibration in terms of operation time and discrimination in terms of application of Pringles maneuver and major morbidity amongst all 4 systems. CONCLUSION: All 4 DSS significantly correlated with outcome measures associated with intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes. The Southampton DSS was the poorest system in our cohort of patients.
Authors: Tan-To Cheung; Xiaoying Wang; Mikhail Efanov; Rong Liu; David Fuks; Gi-Hong Choi; Nicholas L Syn; Charing C Chong; Iswanto Sucandy; Adrian K H Chiow; Marco V Marino; Mikel Gastaca; Jae Hoon Lee; T Peter Kingham; Mathieu D'Hondt; Sung Hoon Choi; Robert P Sutcliffe; Ho-Seong Han; Chung Ngai Tang; Johann Pratschke; Roberto I Troisi; Brian K P Goh Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 7.293