Literature DB >> 33023746

Surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures for benign disease are rare in a large low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening program.

Helen Ho1, Christina Williamson2, Shawn M Regis3, Cameron T Stock2, Syed M Quadri2, Brady J McKee4, Andrea B McKee3, Elliot L Servais5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest computed tomography improves survival. However, concerns about overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions persist. We reviewed our lung cancer screening program to determine the rate of surgery and invasive procedures for nonmalignant disease.
METHODS: We reviewed all patients undergoing lung cancer screening from January 2012 to June 2017 with follow-up through January 2019. Patients with suspicious findings (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System 4) were referred for further evaluation.
RESULTS: Of 3280 patients screened, 345 (10.5%) had Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System 4 findings. A total of 311 patients had complete follow-up, of whom 93 (29.9%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Eighty-three patients underwent lung surgery (2.5% of screened patients). Forty patients underwent lobectomy (48.2%), 3 patients (3.6%) underwent bilobectomy, and 40 patients (48.2%) underwent sublobar resection. Fourteen patients underwent surgery for benign disease (0.43% of screened patients). Fifty-four patients, 5 with benign disease, had at least 1 invasive diagnostic procedure but never underwent surgery. The incidence of any invasive intervention for nonmalignant disease was 0.95% (31/3280 patients). There were no postprocedural deaths within 60 days. Twenty-five patients (0.76%) underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy; 19 patients (76%) had presumed lung cancer without pretreatment pathologic confirmation.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for benign disease occurred in 0.43% of patients undergoing lung cancer screening. The combined incidence of any invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, including surgical resection, for benign disease was only 0.95%. Periprocedural complications were rare. These results indicate that concern over unnecessary interventions is overstated and should not hinder adoption of lung cancer screening. A multidisciplinary team approach, including thoracic surgeons, is critical to maintain an appropriate rate of interventions in lung cancer screening.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low-dose computed tomography; lung cancer; lung cancer screening; thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33023746     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  2 in total

1.  Surgery without preoperative histological confirmation of lung cancer: what is the current clinical practice?

Authors:  Mohammad R Ghamati; Wilson W L Li; Erik H F M van der Heijden; Ad F T M Verhagen; Ronald A Damhuis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Outcomes of Positive and Suspicious Findings in Clinical Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening and the Road Ahead.

Authors:  Shawn M Regis; Andrea Borondy-Kitts; Andrea B McKee; Kimberly Rieger-Christ; Jacob Sands; Jalil Afnan; Brady J McKee
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.