| Literature DB >> 33023525 |
Gene Chi Wai Man1, Jianzhang Wang2,3, Yi Song2, Jack Ho Wong4, Yu Zhao1, Tat San Lau2, Kam Tong Leung5, Tak Hang Chan6, Huating Wang1,7, Joseph Kwong2, Tzi Bun Ng4, Chi Chiu Wang8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a major green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate ((-)-EGCG) as a powerful anti-cancer agent. However, its poor bioavailability and requirement of a high dosage to manifest activity have restricted its clinical application. Recently, our team synthesized a peracetate-protected derivative of EGCG, which can act as a prodrug of (-)-EGCG (ProEGCG) with enhanced stability and improved bioavailability in vitro and in vivo. Herein, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of this novel ProEGCG, in comparison to EGCG, toward human endometrial cancer (EC).Entities:
Keywords: Akt pathway; Anti-angiogenesis; Anticancer; Apoptosis; Endometrial cancer; ProEGCG
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33023525 PMCID: PMC7539473 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07455-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Molecular structures of EGCG (a) and ProEGCG (b)
Fig. 2Effects of ProEGCG and EGCG on cell proliferation of human endometrial cancer cells. RL95–2 and AN3 CA cells were treated with increasing doses of (a, b) EGCG (20, 40, and 60 μM) and (c, d) ProEGCG (20, 40, and 60 μM) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay. The percentage of viable cells was calculated as the ratio of the number of treated cells to the number of control cells. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences from control: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
Fig. 3ProEGCG induced apoptosis in RL95–2 and AN3 CA cells in a time-dependent manner. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of EGCG and ProEGCG (a) RL95–2 cells and (b) AN3 CA cells for 48 h and (c) RL95–2 cells and (d) AN3 CA cells for 72 h. Apoptotic cells were quantitatively analyzed by flow cytometry with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide staining. e Lysates from cells treated with ProEGCG and EGCG were assayed for PARP and caspase-3 cleavage by Western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences from control: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
Fig. 4Effects of ProEGCG and EGCG on activating signaling Akt and MAPKs signaling pathway. Effects of ProEGCG and EGCG on the activation of Akt, ERK, JNK and p-38 in human endometrial (a) RL95–2 cells and (b) AN3 CA cells by Western blotting. Representative Western blot of results from 3 independent experiments are shown in upper panels. Quantification of protein expressions were measured. Full-length of the gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. 5. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences from control: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
Fig. 5ProEGCG inhibits proliferation of endometrial carcinoma in vivo. a Schematic establishment of the xenograft model in this study. b Rl95–2 and (c) AN3 CA cells were injected subcutaneously into athymic nude mice. Tumors were allowed to grow to a size around 100 mm3 and were then orally treated with ProEGCG (50 mg/kg), EGCG (50 mg/kg) or vehicle (olive oil) (n = 5 for each group). The increment of tumor volume and changes of body weight were assessed longitudinally. d Evaluation of hemato-biochemical markers from plasma samples of tumor-bearing mice after treatment with ProEGCG. Full-length of the gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. 5. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences from control: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase
Fig. 6Apoptotic and microvessel development in endometrial carcinoma xenograft tumors after ProEGCG treatment. Haemotoxylin & eosin staining, TUNEL assay, caspase-3 and CD34 in (a) Rl95–2 and (b) AN3 CA xenograft tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (magnification 200x). c, d The expression levels of CD34-postive cells were quantified. e Hierarchical clustering shows differential regulation of BAG1, NOD1 and NAIP (pink tree branch, yellow box) after EGCG and ProEGCG treatments in human EC cell xenografts. f Quantitative analysis by real-time PCR validated the differential expression of NOD1, NAIP and BAG1 after EGCG and ProEGCG treatment in human EC cell lines. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences from control: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01