PURPOSE: The irreversible ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib plus the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab was previously shown to overcome resistance to EGFR TKIs. We studied whether the combination of afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by preventing or delaying resistance. METHODS: Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC without prior treatment of advanced disease were enrolled in this phase II, multicenter trial and randomly assigned to receive afatinib 40 mg orally daily plus cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks or afatinib alone. The primary end point was PFS. RESULTS: Between March 25, 2015 and April 23, 2018, 174 patients were randomly assigned, and 168 (83 on afatinib + cetuximab and 85 on afatinib) were eligible. There was no improvement in PFS in patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.43; P = .94; median, 11.9 months v 13.4 months). Similarly, there was no difference in response rate (67% v 74%; P = .38) or overall survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.36; P = .44). Toxicity was greater with the combination: grade ≥ 3 adverse events related to treatment occurred in 72% of patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with 40% of those receiving afatinib alone, most commonly rash and diarrhea. Dose reductions were more common in patients receiving the combination, and 30% of patients in this arm discontinued cetuximab due to toxicity. At interim analysis, there was insufficient evidence to support continued accrual, and the trial was closed. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab to afatinib did not improve outcomes in previously untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC, despite recognized activity in the acquired resistance setting.
PURPOSE: The irreversible ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib plus the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab was previously shown to overcome resistance to EGFR TKIs. We studied whether the combination of afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by preventing or delaying resistance. METHODS: Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC without prior treatment of advanced disease were enrolled in this phase II, multicenter trial and randomly assigned to receive afatinib 40 mg orally daily plus cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks or afatinib alone. The primary end point was PFS. RESULTS: Between March 25, 2015 and April 23, 2018, 174 patients were randomly assigned, and 168 (83 on afatinib + cetuximab and 85 on afatinib) were eligible. There was no improvement in PFS in patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.43; P = .94; median, 11.9 months v 13.4 months). Similarly, there was no difference in response rate (67% v 74%; P = .38) or overall survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.36; P = .44). Toxicity was greater with the combination: grade ≥ 3 adverse events related to treatment occurred in 72% of patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with 40% of those receiving afatinib alone, most commonly rash and diarrhea. Dose reductions were more common in patients receiving the combination, and 30% of patients in this arm discontinued cetuximab due to toxicity. At interim analysis, there was insufficient evidence to support continued accrual, and the trial was closed. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab to afatinib did not improve outcomes in previously untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC, despite recognized activity in the acquired resistance setting.
Authors: J C-H Yang; L V Sequist; C Zhou; M Schuler; S L Geater; T Mok; C-P Hu; N Yamamoto; J Feng; K O'Byrne; S Lu; V Hirsh; Y Huang; M Sebastian; I Okamoto; N Dickgreber; R Shah; A Märten; D Massey; S Wind; Y-L Wu Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Belinda A Waltman; Dora Dias-Santagata; Subba Digumarthy; Alexa B Turke; Panos Fidias; Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Scott Gettinger; Arjola K Cosper; Sara Akhavanfard; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Temel; James G Christensen; John C Wain; Thomas J Lynch; Kathy Vernovsky; Eugene J Mark; Michael Lanuti; A John Iafrate; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ken Takezawa; Valentina Pirazzoli; Maria E Arcila; Caroline A Nebhan; Xiaoling Song; Elisa de Stanchina; Kadoaki Ohashi; Yelena Y Janjigian; Paula J Spitzler; Mary Ann Melnick; Greg J Riely; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi; Katerina Politi; William Pao Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Philip C Mack; Jieling Miao; Mary W Redman; James Moon; Sarah B Goldberg; Roy S Herbst; Mary Ann Melnick; Zenta Walther; Fred R Hirsch; Katerina Politi; Karen Kelly; David R Gandara Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Alexander J Bridges; Ranjit K Mehta; Sushmita Shukla; Matthew J Schipper; Theodore S Lawrence; Mukesh K Nyati Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2021-05-25