Literature DB >> 33021770

Sex- and age-specific genetic analysis of chronic back pain.

Maxim B Freidin1, Yakov A Tsepilov2,3, Ian B Stanaway4, Weihua Meng5, Caroline Hayward6, Blair H Smith5, Samar Khoury7,8,9, Marc Parisien7,8,9, Andrey Bortsov10, Luda Diatchenko7,8,9, Sigrid Børte11,12,13, Bendik S Winsvold12,13, Ben M Brumpton13, John-Anker Zwart11,12,13, Yurii S Aulchenko2,3,14, Pradeep Suri15,16,17, Frances M K Williams1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Sex differences for chronic back pain (cBP) have been reported, with females usually exhibiting greater morbidity, severity, and poorer response to treatment. Genetic factors acting in an age-specific manner have been implicated but never comprehensively explored. We performed sex- and age-stratified genome-wide association study and single nucleotide polymorphism-by-sex interaction analysis for cBP defined as "Back pain for 3+ months" in 202,077 males and 237,754 females of European ancestry from UK Biobank. Two and 7 nonoverlapping genome-wide significant loci were identified for males and females, respectively. A male-specific locus on chromosome 10 near SPOCK2 gene was replicated in 4 independent cohorts. Four loci demonstrated single nucleotide polymorphism-by-sex interaction, although none of them were formally replicated. Single nucleotide polymorphism-explained heritability was higher in females (0.079 vs 0.067, P = 0.006). There was a high, although not complete, genetic correlation between the sexes (r = 0.838 ± 0.041, different from 1 with P = 7.8E-05). Genetic correlation between the sexes for cBP decreased with age (0.858 ± 0.049 in younger people vs 0.544 ± 0.157 in older people; P = 4.3E-05). There was a stronger genetic correlation of cBP with self-reported diagnosis of intervertebral disk degeneration in males than in females (0.889 vs 0.638; P = 3.7E-06). Thus, the genetic component of cBP in the UK Biobank exhibits a mild sex- and age-dependency. This provides an insight into the possible causes of sex- and age-specificity in epidemiology and pathophysiology of cBP and chronic pain at other anatomical sites.
Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33021770     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  4 in total

1.  A protocol for recruiting and analyzing the disease-oriented Russian disc degeneration study (RuDDS) biobank for functional omics studies of lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  Olga N Leonova; Elizaveta E Elgaeva; Tatiana S Golubeva; Alexey V Peleganchuk; Aleksandr V Krutko; Yurii S Aulchenko; Yakov A Tsepilov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Investigating the Causal Relationship Between Physical Activity and Chronic Back Pain: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Shaowei Gao; Huaqiang Zhou; Siyu Luo; Xiaoying Cai; Fang Ye; Qiulan He; Chanyan Huang; Xiaoyang Zheng; Ying Li; Zhanxin Du; Yaqing Wang; Zhihui Qi; Zhongxing Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Derivation of clinical prediction rules for identifying patients with non-acute low back pain who respond best to a lumbar stabilization exercise program at post-treatment and six-month follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Khalil Rabhi; Richard Preuss; Marie-France Coutu; Nicolas Roy; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Brain-specific genes contribute to chronic but not to acute back pain.

Authors:  Andrey V Bortsov; Marc Parisien; Samar Khoury; Amy E Martinsen; Marie Udnesseter Lie; Ingrid Heuch; Kristian Hveem; John-Anker Zwart; Bendik S Winsvold; Luda Diatchenko
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2022-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.