Literature DB >> 33020647

Bispecific anti-CD20, anti-CD19 CAR T cells for relapsed B cell malignancies: a phase 1 dose escalation and expansion trial.

Nirav N Shah1, Bryon D Johnson2, Dina Schneider3, Fenlu Zhu2, Aniko Szabo4, Carolyn A Keever-Taylor2, Winfried Krueger3, Andrew A Worden3, Michael J Kadan3, Sharon Yim2, Ashley Cunningham5, Mehdi Hamadani2, Timothy S Fenske2, Boro Dropulić6, Rimas Orentas3,7, Parameswaran Hari2.   

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 are a breakthrough treatment for relapsed, refractory B cell malignancies1-5. Despite impressive outcomes, relapse with CD19- disease remains a challenge. We address this limitation through a first-in-human trial of bispecific anti-CD20, anti-CD19 (LV20.19) CAR T cells for relapsed, refractory B cell malignancies. Adult patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia were treated on a phase 1 dose escalation and expansion trial (NCT03019055) to evaluate the safety of 4-1BB-CD3ζ LV20.19 CAR T cells and the feasibility of on-site manufacturing using the CliniMACS Prodigy system. CAR T cell doses ranged from 2.5 × 105-2.5 × 106 cells per kg. Cell manufacturing was set at 14 d with the goal of infusing non-cryopreserved LV20.19 CAR T cells. The target dose of LV20.19 CAR T cells was met in all CAR-naive patients, and 22 patients received LV20.19 CAR T cells on protocol. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity, a dose of 2.5 × 106 cells per kg was chosen for expansion. Grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome occurred in one (5%) patient, and grade 3-4 neurotoxicity occurred in three (14%) patients. Eighteen (82%) patients achieved an overall response at day 28, 14 (64%) had a complete response, and 4 (18%) had a partial response. The overall response rate to the dose of 2.5 × 106 cells per kg with non-cryopreserved infusion (n = 12) was 100% (complete response, 92%; partial response, 8%). Notably, loss of the CD19 antigen was not seen in patients who relapsed or experienced treatment failure. In conclusion, on-site manufacturing and infusion of non-cryopreserved LV20.19 CAR T cells were feasible and therapeutically safe, showing low toxicity and high efficacy. Bispecific CARs may improve clinical responses by mitigating target antigen downregulation as a mechanism of relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33020647     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1081-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  1 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapy.

Authors:  Nirali N Shah; Terry J Fry
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 66.675

  1 in total
  82 in total

1.  CAR T cells better than BiTEs.

Authors:  John C Molina; Nirali N Shah
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-01-26

Review 2.  C(h)AR-ting a new course in incurable lymphomas: CAR T cells for mantle cell and follicular lymphomas.

Authors:  Caron A Jacobson; Marcela V Maus
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  Splitting signals drives CARs further.

Authors:  Tiffany R King-Peoples; Avery D Posey
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-09

4.  Relapsed disease: off-the-shelf immunotherapies vs customized engineered products.

Authors:  Reem Karmali
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 5.  [CAR T-cell therapy for malignant B-cell lymphoma : A new treatment paradigm].

Authors:  H Balke-Want; P Borchmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified Immune Effector Cell Therapies: Learning From the Present; Charting a Path to the Future.

Authors:  Eric L Smith; Renier J Brentjens
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy induces complete remissions in CD19-directed CAR-refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  John H Baird; Matthew J Frank; Juliana Craig; Shabnum Patel; Jay Y Spiegel; Bita Sahaf; Jean S Oak; Sheren F Younes; Michael G Ozawa; Eric Yang; Yasodha Natkunam; John Tamaresis; Zachary Ehlinger; Warren D Reynolds; Sally Arai; Laura Johnston; Robert Lowsky; Everett Meyer; Robert S Negrin; Andrew R Rezvani; Parveen Shiraz; Surbhi Sidana; Wen-Kai Weng; Kara L Davis; Sneha Ramakrishna; Liora Schultz; Chelsea Mullins; Allison Jacob; Ilan Kirsch; Steven A Feldman; Crystal L Mackall; David B Miklos; Lori Muffly
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Bispecific CAR T Cells against EpCAM and Inducible ICAM-1 Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity and Generate Superior Antitumor Responses.

Authors:  Yanping Yang; Jaclyn E McCloskey; Huan Yang; Janusz Puc; Yago Alcaina; Yogindra Vedvyas; Angel A Gomez Gallegos; Elizabeth Ortiz-Sánchez; Elisa de Stanchina; Irene M Min; Eric von Hofe; Moonsoo M Jin
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 11.151

9.  A Prospective Investigation of Bispecific CD19/22 CAR T Cell Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Jiaqi Li; Xiaoyan Lou; Xiaochen Chen; Zhou Yu; Liqing Kang; Jia Chen; Jin Zhou; Xiangping Zong; Zhen Yang; Minghao Li; Nan Xu; Sixun Jia; Hongzhi Geng; Guanghua Chen; Haiping Dai; Xiaowen Tang; Lei Yu; Depei Wu; Caixia Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Current State of CAR T-Cell Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Veronika Mancikova; Michal Smida
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.