| Literature DB >> 33020646 |
Alain P Algazi1, Megan Othus2, Adil I Daud3, Roger S Lo4, Janice M Mehnert5, Thach-Giao Truong6, Robert Conry7, Kari Kendra8, Gary C Doolittle9, Joseph I Clark10, Michael J Messino11, Dennis F Moore12, Christopher Lao13, Bryan A Faller14, Rangaswamy Govindarajan15, Amy Harker-Murray16, Luke Dreisbach17, James Moon2, Kenneth F Grossmann18, Antoni Ribas4.
Abstract
Preclinical modeling suggests that intermittent BRAF inhibitor therapy may delay acquired resistance when blocking oncogenic BRAFV600 in melanoma1,2. We conducted S1320, a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02196181) evaluating whether intermittent dosing of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib improves progression-free survival in patients with metastatic and unresectable BRAFV600 melanoma. Patients were enrolled at 68 academic and community sites nationally. All patients received continuous dabrafenib and trametinib during an 8-week lead-in period, after which patients with non-progressing tumors were randomized to either continuous or intermittent dosing of both drugs on a 3-week-off, 5-week-on schedule. The trial has completed accrual and 206 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized 1:1 to the two study arms (105 to continuous dosing, 101 to intermittent dosing). Continuous dosing yielded a statistically significant improvement in post-randomization progression-free survival compared with intermittent dosing (median 9.0 months versus 5.5 months, P = 0.064, pre-specified two-sided α = 0.2). Therefore, contrary to the initial hypothesis, intermittent dosing did not improve progression-free survival in patients. There were no differences in the secondary outcomes, including overall survival and the overall incidence of treatment-associated toxicity, between the two groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33020646 PMCID: PMC8063889 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1060-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440