| Literature DB >> 33020402 |
Deokho Lee1,2, Yukihiro Miwa1,2,3, Jing Wu4, Chiho Shoda1,2,5, Heonuk Jeong1,2, Hirokazu Kawagishi4,6, Kazuo Tsubota2,7, Toshihide Kurihara1,2.
Abstract
Neovascular retinal degeneration is a leading cause of blindness in advanced countries. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs have been used for neovascular retinal diseases; however, anti-VEGF drugs may cause the development of chorioretinal atrophy in chronic therapy as they affect the physiological amount of VEGF needed for retinal homeostasis. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is a transcription factor inducing VEGF expression under hypoxic and other stress conditions. Previously, we demonstrated that HIF was involved with pathological retinal angiogenesis in murine models of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR), and pharmacological HIF inhibition prevented retinal neovascularization by reducing an ectopic amount of VEGF. Along with this, we attempted to find novel effective HIF inhibitors. Compounds originally isolated from mushroom-forming fungi were screened for prospective HIF inhibitors utilizing cell lines of 3T3, ARPE-19 and 661W. A murine OIR model was used to examine the anti-angiogenic effects of the compounds. As a result, 2-azahypoxanthine (AHX) showed an inhibitory effect on HIF activation and suppressed Vegf mRNA upregulation under CoCl2-induced pseudo-hypoxic conditions. Oral administration of AHX significantly suppressed retinal neovascular tufts in the OIR model. These data suggest that AHX could be a promising anti-angiogenic agent in retinal neovascularization by inhibiting HIF activation.Entities:
Keywords: 2-azahypoxanthine; fairy chemicals; hypoxia-inducible factor; oxygen-induced retinopathy; retinal neovascularization; vascular endothelial growth factor
Year: 2020 PMID: 33020402 PMCID: PMC7599576 DOI: 10.3390/biom10101405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Primer list.
| Name | Direction | Sequence (5′ → 3′) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Forward | TCAGTCAACGGGGGACATAAA | NM_013556.2 |
| Reverse | GGGGCTGTACTGCTTAACCAG | ||
|
| Forward | GGTTCCAGCAGACCCAGTTA | NM_001313919.1 |
| Reverse | AGGCTCCTTGGATGAGCTTT | ||
|
| Forward | CTGAGGAAGGAGAAATCCCGT | NM_010137.3 |
| Reverse | TGTGTCCGAAGGAAGCTGATG | ||
|
| Forward | CCTGGTGGACATCTTCCAGGAGTACC | AY707864.1 |
| Reverse | GAAGCTCATCTCTCCTATGTGCTGGC | ||
|
| Forward | GCTCCCAGACACCACAAGAT | NM_009760.4 |
| Reverse | TGAGAGTAGCTGTGCGCTTC | ||
|
| Forward | GGCGGCTTTGTGATTTGTAT | NM_172665.5 |
| Reverse | ACCTGAATCGGGGGATAAAC |
Figure A1Structural formulas of nine compounds from mushroom-forming fungi. Structural formulas of (A) AHX, (B) AOH, (C) ICA, (D) erinacine A, (E) heicenone C, (F) heicenone D, (G) heicenone E, (H) grifolin and (I) neogrifolin are depicted.
Screenings of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitors from mushrooms.
| Name | 1st Trial in 3T3 | 2nd Trial in ARPE-19 | 3rd Trial in 661W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold Change ± SD | Fold Change ± SD | Fold Change ± SD | ||||
| Topotecan | 0.96 ± 0.26 | 0.855 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 0.002 ** | 0.81 ± 0.11 | 0.074 |
| Doxorubicin | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 0.014 * | 1.10 ± 0.09 | 0.135 | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.006 ** |
|
| 0.39 ± 0.06 |
| 0.39 ± 0.03 |
| 0.42 ± 0.07 |
|
|
| 0.35 ± 0.03 |
| 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.091 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.086 |
| ICA | 1.02 ± 0.32 | 0.939 | ||||
| Erinacine A | 1.50 ± 0.16 | 0.054 | ||||
| Hericenone C | 1.25 ± 0.11 | 0.224 | ||||
| Hericenone D | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 0.276 | ||||
| Hericenone E | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.115 | ||||
| Grifolin | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.223 | ||||
| Negrifolin | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.338 |
The fold change in HIF activity was compared with the value of CoCl2-induced HIF activity. Statistically significant inhibitory effects of compounds from mushrooms are shown in bold typeface (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). AHX: 2-azahypoxanthine; AOH: 2-aza-8-oxo-hypoxanthine; ICA: midazole-4-carboxamide.
Figure 1Inhibitory effects of AHX isolated from mushrooms on HIF activation. Quantitative analyses of the HIF-reporter luciferase assays using (A) 3T3, (B) ARPE-19 and (C) 661W cells (n = 3–6 per group) showed that AHX inhibited HIF activity induced by 200 µM CoCl2 in all of the cell lines. *** p < 0.001, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 compared with no treatment and 200 µM CoCl2 treatment, respectively. Bar graphs are presented as the mean with the ± standard error of the mean. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 2The inhibitory effect of AHX on HIF stabilization. The representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses (n = 4 per group) for HIF-1α, HIF-2α and β-Actin showed that only HIF-1α was stabilized in 661W cells under 200 µM CoCl2-induced pseudo-hypoxic conditions. Note that AHX did not significantly decrease the stabilized HIF-1α expression. * p < 0.05 compared with no treatment. Bar graphs are presented as the mean with the ± standard error of the mean. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 3Suppression of hypoxia-responsive gene expressions by AHX treatment. Relative fold changes in (A) Hif-1α, (B) Hif-2α, (C) Vegf, (D) Bnip3 and (E) Pdk1 mRNA expressions were shown after 6 h of AHX treatment under 200 µM CoCl2-induced pseudo-hypoxic condition in 661W cells by quantitative PCR analyses (n = 3–6 per group). The upregulated Vegf and Pdk1 mRNA expressions were suppressed by AHX treatment. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with no treatment and CoCl2 treatment, respectively. Bar graphs are presented as the mean with the ± standard error of the mean. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 4Suppression of neovascularization by oral administration of AHX. (A) The schematic illustration shows the murine OIR model procedure and the oral administration of the AHX or vehicle to mice. (B) Quantitative analyses for body weights of the mice (n = 5–6 per group) showed that the average body weights of the AHX-administered group (three male and three female pups) did not significantly differ from those of the vehicle group (three male and two female pups) during the administration period. (C) Representative images of retinal vascular whole mount (vehicle 1, 2 and AHX 1, 2) staining with isolectin B4 (neovascular tufts: red and vaso-obliteration: yellow), and higher-magnification images (green) for neovascular tufts. Scale bars are 1000 and 200 µm, respectively. (D) Quantitative analyses showed that areas of neovascular tufts (red) were suppressed in the AHX-administered group (n = 6) in comparison with those in the vehicle-administered group (n = 5), while no significant difference in vaso-obliteration (yellow) was observed between the groups. * p < 0.05. Bar graphs were presented as mean with ± standard error of the mean. The data were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test.