Literature DB >> 33020278

The scale dependency of spatial crop species diversity and its relation to temporal diversity.

Fernando Aramburu Merlos1,2, Robert J Hijmans3.   

Abstract

Increasing crop species diversity can enhance agricultural sustainability, but the scale dependency of the processes that shape diversity and of the effects of diversity on agroecosystems is insufficiently understood. We used 30 m spatial resolution crop classification data for the conterminous United States to analyze spatial and temporal crop species diversity and their relationship. We found that the US average temporal (crop rotation) diversity is 2.1 effective number of species and that a crop's average temporal diversity is lowest for common crops. Spatial diversity monotonically increases with the size of the unit of observation, and it is most strongly associated with temporal diversity when measured for areas of 100 to 400 ha, which is the typical US farm size. The association between diversity in space and time weakens as data are aggregated over larger areas because of the increasing diversity among farms, but at intermediate aggregation levels (counties) it is possible to estimate temporal diversity and farm-scale spatial diversity from aggregated spatial crop diversity data if the effect of beta diversity is considered. For larger areas, the diversity among farms is usually much greater than the diversity within them, and this needs to be considered when analyzing large-area crop diversity data. US agriculture is dominated by a few major annual crops (maize, soybean, wheat) that are mostly grown on fields with a very low temporal diversity. To increase crop species diversity, currently minor crops would have to increase in area at the expense of these major crops.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agrobiodiversity; crop rotation; spatial scale; temporal diversity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33020278      PMCID: PMC7584990          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011702117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  Grassland-Cropping Rotations: An Avenue for Agricultural Diversification to Reconcile High Production with Environmental Quality.

Authors:  Gilles Lemaire; François Gastal; Alan Franzluebbers; Abad Chabbi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health.

Authors:  David Tilman; Michael Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mapping global cropland and field size.

Authors:  Steffen Fritz; Linda See; Ian McCallum; Liangzhi You; Andriy Bun; Elena Moltchanova; Martina Duerauer; Fransizka Albrecht; Christian Schill; Christoph Perger; Petr Havlik; Aline Mosnier; Philip Thornton; Ulrike Wood-Sichra; Mario Herrero; Inbal Becker-Reshef; Chris Justice; Matthew Hansen; Peng Gong; Sheta Abdel Aziz; Anna Cipriani; Renato Cumani; Giuliano Cecchi; Giulia Conchedda; Stefanus Ferreira; Adriana Gomez; Myriam Haffani; Francois Kayitakire; Jaiteh Malanding; Rick Mueller; Terence Newby; Andre Nonguierma; Adeaga Olusegun; Simone Ortner; D Ram Rajak; Jansle Rocha; Dmitry Schepaschenko; Maria Schepaschenko; Alexey Terekhov; Alex Tiangwa; Christelle Vancutsem; Elodie Vintrou; Wu Wenbin; Marijn van der Velde; Antonia Dunwoody; Florian Kraxner; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Crop Rotation and Intercropping Strategies for Weed Management.

Authors:  Matt Liebman; Elizabeth Dyck
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Ecologically sustainable weed management: How do we get from proof-of-concept to adoption?

Authors:  Matt Liebman; Bàrbara Baraibar; Yvonne Buckley; Dylan Childs; Svend Christensen; Roger Cousens; Hanan Eizenberg; Sanne Heijting; Donato Loddo; Aldo Merotto; Michael Renton; Marleen Riemens
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem.

Authors:  L K Tiemann; A S Grandy; E E Atkinson; E Marin-Spiotta; M D McDaniel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator dependence without a parallel increase in crop diversification.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Sebastián Aguiar; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Lucas A Garibaldi; David W Inouye; Chuleui Jung; Dino J Martins; Rodrigo Medel; Carolina L Morales; Hien Ngo; Anton Pauw; Robert J Paxton; Agustín Sáez; Colleen L Seymour
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D McDaniel; L K Tiemann; A S Grandy
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.105

9.  Crop Species Diversity Changes in the United States: 1978-2012.

Authors:  Jonathan Aguilar; Greta G Gramig; John R Hendrickson; David W Archer; Frank Forcella; Mark A Liebig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Agricultural intensification was associated with crop diversification in India (1947-2014).

Authors:  Jamey C Smith; Aniruddha Ghosh; Robert J Hijmans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Crop diversification in Idaho's Magic Valley: the present and the imaginary.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Spangler; Emily K Burchfield; Claudia Radel; Douglas Jackson-Smith; River Johnson
Journal:  Agron Sustain Dev       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 7.832

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.