Association between dementia and depression: a retrospective study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database.

OBJECTIVES: Dementia is common in people over the age of 65 years, with 80% of people with dementia older than 75 years. Previous studies have linked dementia to late-life depression, but the association between dementia and mid-life depression is poorly understood. Depression is a preventable and treatable medical condition, which means it is a modifiable factor that can potentially prevent or delay dementia. This study aimed to identify the association between dementia and depression within the life course.
DESIGN: A nationwide, retrospective propensity score matched cohort study associating dementia with depression. Depression diagnosed between the ages of 45 and 64 years was classified as 'mid-life' and 'late-life' if diagnosed at 65 years or older. Patients were considered to have depression when one or more International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision codes for depression were recorded as primary or secondary diagnosis.
SETTING: National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea, containing patient data from 2002 to 2013. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 1824 and 374 852 patients in the case and control groups, respectively. A logistic regression analysis with complex sampling design was performed after adjusting for covariates, using the propensity score matching method without callipers, with a 1:1 nearest neighbour matching algorithm. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The association of mid-onset and late-onset depression with dementia in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, such as sex and age, within the Korean population.
RESULTS: Dementia was significantly associated with the presence of depression (OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.53-3.14); in particular, female patients with depression and patients aged 45-64 years with depression had increased odds of dementia (OR=2.65, 95% CI=1.78-3.93 and OR=2.72, 95% CI=1.41-5.24, respectively)
CONCLUSION: Depression is an associated factor for dementia, especially among people aged 45-64 years (mid-life). © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), a representative sample of Korea, and our findings on the relationship between dementia and depression is therefore reliable.

Patients were included in the case group based on usage of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision diagnostic codes, resulting in accurate results that reflect the actual medical environment.

By analysing the 10-year follow-up data of patients diagnosed with depression through propensity scores, we ensured adequate statistical explanation.

Our use of NHIS-NSC data rather than medical records, enabled us to control the association of various covariates with dementia, although diagnostic accuracy may be limited.

It was not possible to confirm if the clinical intervention for depression was protective against the development of dementia.

Introduction

Dementia is a common condition affecting older adults, with 80% of those affected by dementia aged 75 years or older.1 Dementia causes a significant strain on national budgets; the worldwide economic burden of dementia was roughly US$818 billion in 2015 and was estimated to increase to more than US$1 trillion in 2018.2 In the US alone, dementia was responsible for a total expense of US$277 billion in 2018, and is expected to reach approximately US$1.1 trillion in 2050.3 In Korea, about 15.2 trillion won (about 1% of the gross domestic product (GDP)) were spent on dementia in 2020; this amount is predicted to reach 43.2 trillion won in 2050 (about 1.5% of the GDP).4

As the average life expectancy rises, the population ages and the economic burden of the dementia increases.5 In 2019, the number of people suffering from dementia worldwide was about 50 million; this number is estimated to reach 152 million in 2050.6 The prevalence of dementia among the elderly population (aged 65 years or older) in South Korea (referred to as Korea henceforth) is expected to increase from 10.28% in 2019 to 16.09% in 2050, and the number of patients with dementia will be approximately 3 million in 2050 (15% of the total elderly population).7

Depression is a common comorbid disorder in adults with dementia; in fact, 30%–50% of dementia cases are accompanied by depression.8 Clinically, depression and dementia are distinct but share some of the symptoms, such as decreased social and occupational functioning, attention deficit and impaired working memory.9 Due to these intrinsic similarities, it can be difficult to distinguish depression from dementia. Previous studies have reported that depression accelerates cognitive decline10 and is an independent risk factor for dementia.11 As such, depression and dementia appear to be associated, but the relationship between the two conditions is complex and hard to determine.

A previous study reported depression to be a risk factor for dementia, and found that eliminating depression is likely to have the biggest impact on reducing the incidence of dementia.12 Late-life depression is consistently associated with two-fold increased risk of dementia13 and clinically, it has been associated with an increased risk for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.14 The onset of depression before the age of 65 years may be a long-term risk factor for the development of dementia.15 Furthermore, considering the high prevalence of depression in young and middle-aged adults, and the long preclinical period of dementia, studies focusing on earlier-life depression may provide an opportunity to determine whether depression is a risk factor for dementia. Therefore, it is important to look at depression and dementia studies from a life-course approach.16

It is important to note that depression is a preventable and treatable medical condition, thereby making it a potentially modifiable factor that can prevent or delay dementia.17 In previous studies, treatment of depression in elderly depressed patients, using pharmacology, cognitive behavioural therapy and other modalities, improved cognitive function and led to improvement in memory, other aspects of cognitive performance,18–20 and pathophysiology underlying dementia.21 22 Understanding the relationship between depression and dementia can inform long-term predictive models and more rational prophylactic interventions.11 The purpose of this study was to analyse the association between dementia and depression from a life-course approach, using nationally representative data from Korea.

Methods

Data source

The present study used data from National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) database (DB) of the NHIS. The NHIS-NSC DB contains data for 1 025 340 health insurance beneficiaries and medical benefit entitlement holders (excluding foreigners) for a period of 12 years, from 2002 to 2013. The DB is a nationwide, stratified random sample of the Korean population, with 1 025 340 individuals in 2002 and 1 014 730 in 2013, comprising approximately 2.2% of the total Korean population. The data include socio-demographic characteristics, such as disability and death, along with sex, age, region, subscriber division, income, usage of medical services (medical care and health check-up) and status of medical institutions (region, size, number of doctors, etc). The NHIS-NSC DB is known to adequately represent populations in terms of regions, insurance claims and the prevalence of major diseases.23

Patient and public involvement

There was no direct patient or public involvement in this study.

Study design and population

The present study is a nationwide retrospective propensity score matched (PSM) cohort study, aiming to determine the presence of dementia in patients with and without depression using the NHIS-NSC DB. The selection process of the case and control groups in this study is shown in figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the study design. NHIS, National Health Insurance Service.

Patients with missing sociodemographic and medical data for 11 years (2003–2013) were excluded. The case group (patients with depression) included patients newly diagnosed with depression in 2003. If depression had been diagnosed between the ages of 45 and 64 years, it was classified as ‘mid-life’ depression; if it was diagnosed at 65 years or above, it was classified as ‘late-life’ depression. Using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10), patients were included in the case group if they received a primary or secondary diagnosis of depression more than once. In this study, data from the year 2002 was not included, in order to exclude patients with pre-existing depression and/or dementia. The final number of patients in the case group was 1824. The control group consisted of patients with no diagnosis of depression in 2002 and 2003, and no diagnosis of dementia in 2002. The initial number of control patients was 374 852. For each patient in the case group, age, sex, income, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, presence of disability and area of residence were matched to randomly select the control patients, using the PSM method to balance the confounders and reduce the selection bias,24 as described in detail below. The study population is shown in figure 1.

Outcomes and other variables

Measurement of dementia

Patients in the case and control groups were observed for newly diagnosed dementia until the end of 2013. Specifically, patients were defined as having dementia when one or more ICD-10 codes for dementia were recorded as the primary or secondary diagnosis: F00 (dementia in Alzheimer’s disease), F01 (vascular dementia), F02 (dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere), F03 (unspecified dementia), F051 (delirium superimposed on dementia), G30 (Alzheimer’s disease) and G311 (senile degeneration of the brain, not elsewhere classified). The primary outcome was the presence of dementia in individuals with or without depression.

Measurement of depression

Patients were defined as having depression when one or more ICD-10 codes for depression were recorded as the primary or secondary diagnosis: F32.0 (mild depressive episode), F32.1 (moderate depressive episode), F32.2 (severe depressive episode without psychotic symptoms), F32.3 (severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms), F33.0 (recurrent depressive disorder, current episode mild), F33.1 (recurrent depressive disorder, current episode moderate), F33.2 (recurrent depressive disorder, current episode severe without psychotic symptoms) and F33.3 (recurrent depressive disorder, current episode severe with psychotic symptoms).

Other variables

Based on previous studies, we selected age,25–29 sex,30 income level,31 comorbidity,32 presence of disability33 and region31 as covariates affecting the incidence of dementia. The specific definitions of the variables were determined as follows: through a review of previous studies,25–29 the association between depression and dementia appeared clinically in three age groups, and age was therefore categorised into three groups (≤44 years, 45–64 years and ≥65 years). Income levels, available as deciles in the NHIS-NSC DB, were divided into three categories: low (0–3), middle (4–7) and high (8–10).31 Regions were categorised into three groups: Seoul, metropolitan cities and non-metropolitan cities.31 The CCI is an indicator of the effect a patient’s illness has on mortality, and was categorised into four groups (0, 1, 2 and ≥3), using Quan’s ICD-10 CCI instrument.34 The presence of disability was dichotomised as ‘non-disabled’ and ‘disabled’.33

Statistical analyses

Sociodemographic characteristics of the case and control groups were compared using the χ2 test before PSM. To remove selection bias from covariates in the observational data, the PSM method was used without callipers with a 1:1 nearest neighbour matching algorithm. We also used a method to exclude individuals outside of the areas where both groups were commonly observed to ensure a good balance. The covariates were age, sex, income, CCI score, presence of disability and area of residence.

After PSM, we performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the OR and 95% CI. The equations used in the logistic regressions are as follows:

where is the probability of developing dementia for each individual (i). Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 is obtained by additionally adjusting for income tertiles and area of residence. Finally, model 3 is obtained by modifying model 2 to include CCI score and disability type. The discriminatory power of the models was analysed using the receiver operating characteristic curve; the area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine the model fit (the closer this value is to 1, the better is the model fit).35 All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics V.25.0 (Windows; IBM) and SAS V.9.4 (SAS Institute). The level of significance was set at a two-sided p value<0.05.

Results

Demographic characteristics before and after propensity score matching

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of patients before PSM matching. Before PSM, 72.5% of the total number of depressed patients were women and 84.5% were younger than 65 years, indicating that depression was more common in women than men and more prevalent in younger individuals than those ≥65 years of age. The percentage of patients with depression increased as the income tertile increased, reaching 47.9% in the high-income tertile (8–10).

Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population before propensity score matching

Category	Depression (1824)		Non-depression (374 852)		P value†
	Before matching		Before matching
	n*	%	n*	%
Sex
Men	501	27.5	153 521	41	<0.001**
Women	1323	72.5	221 331	59
Age (years)
≤44	741	40.6	240 225	64.1
45–64	801	43.9	102 545	27.4	<0.001**
≥65	282	15.5	32 082	8.6
Income
Low (0–3)	307	16.8	67 379	18	<0.001**
Middle (4–7)	643	35.3	144 560	38.5
High (8–10)	874	47.9	162 913	43.5
CCI score
0	742	40.7	229 980	61.4	<0.001**
1	766	42	116 136	31
2	228	12.5	21 722	5.8
≥3	88	4.8	7014	1.9
Disability type
Non-disabled (0)	1757	96.3	365 088	97.4	0.016
Disabled (1)	67	3.7	9764	2.6
Region
Seoul (0)	389	21.3	64 661	17.3	<0.001**
Metropolitan cities (1)	424	23.3	98 986	26.4
Non-metropolitan cities (2)	1011	55.4	211 205	56.3

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.

†P for trend: χ2 and analysis of variance.

CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.

The proportion of depressed patients with a CCI score ≥3 was 4.8%, whereas 40.7% had a CCI score of 0. Furthermore, 3.7% of the depressed patients were disabled. In terms of area of residence, 21.3%, 23.3% and 55.4% of patients with depression resided in Seoul, metropolitan cities and non-metropolitan cities, respectively. The presence of dementia was 6.1% in the depression group. There were no significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics between the depression and non-depression group after PSM.

Demographic characteristics of the study population stratified by dementia status

Table 2 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of patients with dementia after PSM. After PSM, 83.5% of the patients with dementia were women, significantly higher than the proportion of men with dementia (p<0.01). The proportion of patients≥65 years old with dementia was 65.9%, significantly higher than the proportion of patients younger than 65 years with dementia (p<0.01). The majority (57.3%) of patients with dementia were in the high-income (8–10) group; the higher the income tertile, the higher the number of patients with dementia (p<0.05). The proportion of patients diagnosed with dementia with a CCI score ≥3 and 0 was 11.0% and 14.6%, respectively (p<0.01). The proportion of non-disabled patients with dementia (89.0%) was significantly higher than that of disabled patients with dementia (11.0%) (p<0.01). The presence of dementia was 67.7% in the depression group, indicating that dementia was significantly more prevalent in patients with depression (p<0.01). There was no difference in terms of area of residence between dementia and non-dementia groups (p=0.507).

Table 2

Patient characteristics by dementia status

Category	Non-dementia (3484)		Dementia (164)		P value†
	n	%	n	%
Sex
Men	975	28	27	16.5	0.001**
Women	2509	72	137	83.5
Age (years)
<65	3028	86.9	56	34.1	<0.001**
≥65	456	13.1	108	65.9
Income
Low (0–3)	588	16.9	26	15.9	0.035*
Middle (4–7)	1242	35.6	44	26.8
High (8–10)	1654	47.5	94	57.3
CCI score
0	1460	41.9	24	14.6	<0.001**
1	1449	41.6	83	50.6
2	417	12.0	39	23.8
≥3	158	4.5	18	11.0
Disability type
Non-disabled (0)	3368	96.7	146	89.0	<0.001**
Disabled (1)	116	3.3	18	11.0
Region
Seoul (0)	752	21.6	26	15.9	0.507
Metropolitan cities (1)	813	23.3	35	21.3
Non-metropolitan cities (2)	1919	55.1	103	62.8
Depression
Non-depression (0)	1771	50.8	53	32.3	<0.001**
Depression (1)	1713	49.2	111	67.7

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.

†χ2 and analysis of varaince tests were performed to determine differences between groups with/without dementia.

CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Logistic regression analyses of factors correlated with dementia

Table 3 shows the ORs for dementia according to depression status and covariate correction. The ORs and 95% CI were calculated with the corresponding non-depression group as the reference. Before adjusting for all variables, the OR of developing dementia in patients with depression was 2.17 (95% CI=1.55–3.02) and the AUC was 0.593. In model 1, the OR of developing dementia was 2.09 (95% CI=1.47–2.98) and the AUC was 0.857. In model 2, the OR of developing dementia was 2.11 (95% CI=1.48–3.00), and the AUC was 0.861. In model 3, the OR of developing dementia was 2.20 (95% CI=1.53–3.14) and the AUC was 0.883 (highest of all the tested models).

Table 3

ORs for dementia by depression status and adjusted covariates

Variables	Odds ratio (95% CI)
	Crude			Model 1			Model 2			Model 3
	OR	95% CI	P value	OR	95% CI	P value	OR	95% CI	P value	OR	95% CI	P value
Depression
No	1.00			1.00			1.00			1.00
Yes	2.17	1.55–3.02	<0.001**	2.09	1.47–2.98	<0.001**	2.11	1.48–3.00	<0.001**	2.20	1.53–3.14	<0.001**
Gender
Men				1.00			1.00			1.00
Women				1.80	1.16–2.78	0.009**	1.89	1.21–2.93	0.005**	2.06	1.31–3.24	0.002**
Age (years)
≤44				1.00			1.00			1.00
45–64				37.22	5.14–269.47	<0.001**	36.59	5.05–269.94	<0.001**	29.03	4.00–210.65	0.001**
≥65				291.10	40.52–>999.99	<0.001**	280.33	39.00–>999.99	<0.001**	199.48	27.64 to>999.99	<0.001**
Region
Seoul							1.00			1.00
Metropolitan cities							1.35	0.78–2.34	0.279	1.43	0.82–2.50	0.204
Non-metropolitan cities							1.50	0.94–2.39	0.092	1.57	0.97–2.52	0.064
Income
Low							1.00			1.00
Middle							0.74	0.44–1.26	0.265	0.70	0.41–1.20	0.199
High							1.09	0.68–1.76	0.725	1.02	0.63–1.66	0.945
CCI score
0										1.00
1										2.20	1.35–3.56	0.001**
2										2.83	1.63–4.90	<0.001**
≥3										3.14	1.59–6.21	0.001**
Disability type
Not disabled										1.00
Disabled										2.61	1.46–4.68	0.001**
AUC	0.593			0.857			0.861			0.883
Pr>χ2†	–			0.917			0.808			0.431

Logistic regression analysis with complex sampling design was performed by adjusting for covariates. Dependent variable: Dementia; Main independent variable: Depression.

Model 1: Adjusted for sex and age.

Model 2: Model 1+adjusted for region and income.

Model 3: Model 2+adjusted for CCI and disability type.

The AUC measures the discriminatory ability of the prediction model.

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.

†Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit test p value

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Table 4 shows the ORs for dementia in patients with depression by sex and age. The ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using the non-depression group as reference. In model 1, the OR of developing dementia was 2.56 (95% CI=1.74–3.79) in female patients with depression; the ORs of developing dementia in 45–64 years old and ≥65 years old patients with depression were 2.19 and 2.02 (95% CI=1.16–4.14% and 95% CI=1.31–3.12), respectively. In model 2, the OR of developing dementia in female patients was 2.58 (95% CI=1.74–3.81); the ORs of developing dementia in 45–64 years old and ≥65 years old patients with depression were 2.25 and 2.05 (95% CI=1.18–4.26% and 95% CI =1.32–3.18), respectively. Model 3 predicted the OR of developing dementia in female patients without depression to be 2.65 (95% CI=1.78–3.93); the ORs for developing dementia were 2.72 and 2.05 in patients with depression aged 45–64 years and ≥65 years (95% CI=1.41–5.24% and 95% CI=1.32–3.19), respectively, using age-matched patients without depression as a reference.

Table 4

ORs for developing dementia in patients with depression by sex and age

Category	Depression status	N (case)	Model 1†			Model 2‡			Model 3§
			OR	95% CI	P value	OR	95% CI	P value	OR	95% CI	P value
Sex
Men	Non-depression	501 (11)	Ref			Ref			Ref
	Depression	501 (16)	1.52	0.67–3.44	0.309	1.53	0.67–3.48	0.306	1.55	0.67–3.55	0.300
Women	Non-depression	1323 (42)	Ref			Ref			Ref
	Depression	1323 (95)	2.56	1.74–3.79	<0.001**	2.58	1.74–3.81	<0.001**	2.65	1.78–3.93	<0.001**
Age (years)
≤44	Non-depression	814 (0)	Ref			Ref			Ref
	Depression	814 (1)	2.65	0.23–29.26	0.427	2.40	0.21–26.74	0.476	1.88	0.15–22.99	0.619
45–64	Non-depression	728 (14)
	Depression	728 (41)	2.19	1.16–4.14	0.015*	2.25	1.18–4.26	0.013*	2.72	1.41–5.24	0.003**
≥65	Non-depression	282 (39)	Ref			Ref			Ref
	Depression	282 (69)	2.02	1.31–3.12	0.001**	2.05	1.32–3.18	0.001**	2.05	1.32–3.19	0.001**

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.

†Model 1: Adjusted for sex and age.

‡Model 2: Model 1 + adjusted for region and income.

§Model 3: Model 2 + adjusted for CCI and disability type.

Discussion

In this study, we have examined the ORs for developing dementia in patients with and without depression, and found that the presence of dementia was higher in patients with depression. In a subgroup analysis, depression was identified as an associated factor for dementia in women and mid-life patients. Previous studies have reported late-life depression to be closely associated with the risk of dementia.36–39 Similarly, another study found a strong association between the number of depression episodes accumulated during a follow-up period of 24 years, and the risk of dementia.40 The HR for dementia was 1.87 (95% CI=1.21–2.88) times higher in people who experienced one episode of depression, compared with those who never experienced an episode of depression, while those who experienced episodes of depression more than twice had a HR of 2.08 (95% CI=1.23–3.52). Interestingly, the occurrence of depressive symptoms in mid-life (40–50 years) were associated with risk of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia.10 Moreover, previous studies have shown that depression is a risk factor for dementia and that dementia is over three times more likely to occur in women with depressive symptoms than in those without depressive symptoms.41

Other factors, such as having a low income and residing in the countryside, are also risk factors for dementia,42 43 and an impairment in physical fitness increases the chance of developing dementia.44 In this regard, the CCI score is also associated with comorbidities that act as risk factors for dementia, such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes mellitus32; therefore, a high CCI score should be equally correlated with the presence of dementia. Likewise, people with intellectual disabilities and reduced cognitive function tend to develop dementia at a young age.45 In our study, the discriminatory ability of the prediction model increased after adjusting for covariates, such as gender, age, income level and CCI, which are known to be the risk factors for dementia. This was evidenced by model 3, having the highest AUC of all the tested models (0.883).

The strongest factors linking depression to dementia are vascular disease, stress-induced hippocampal atrophy, accumulation of β-amyloid plaques, inflammation and deficiency of neurotrophic factors (such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor), as reviewed elsewhere.15 Even though previous studies have reported that vascular disease can contribute to late-life depression,46–48 vascular disease has also been attributed as an effect of depression; therefore, the direction of the causality remains controversial.49 50 Ischaemic injury to the frontal lobe due to vascular disease has been proposed to lead to cognitive deficits,51 but studies exploring the association between stress hormones and hippocampal atrophy have been limited to animal studies, focusing essentially on stress responses. Nonetheless, high-stress conditions or exogenous glucocorticoids can promote nerve damage in the hippocampus, leading to memory impairment.52 53 In another study, an increase in the duration of depression was associated with a decrease in hippocampal volume.54 In contrast, a different study showed that a history of depression increases the risk of Alzheimer’s disease, but not the hippocampal or amygdala volumes.55 The accumulation of hippocampal plaques and cognitive decline are more pronounced in dementia patients with a history of depression than in non-depressed patients.56 It is unclear whether depression-associated organismal changes are mechanistically linked to dementia. Possibly, cytokines, which are more abundant in depressed patients (such as interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor), interfere with 5-hydroxytryptamine metabolism and reduce synaptic plasticity and hippocampal neurogenesis.57 58 Another putative link between depression and dementia is a reduced activity of neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor.58 Previous studies have shown that antidepressants such as amitriptyline, dosulepin and paroxetine are also correlated with the development of dementia. In particular, the OR was high when the dose was administered between 15 and 20 years.59 The authors reported a strong association between certain classes of anticholinergic drugs and the future incidence of dementia. This could be caused by a class-specific effect, or by drugs being used for very early symptoms of dementia.

Dementia is now a priority in many countries, for both health and social reasons. The US, Britain, France, Norway and South Korea have been developing and establishing plans and strategies for preventing dementia.60 In Korea, the first Korean National Dementia Plan was established in 2008, followed by the second in 2012, and the third in 2014; the country continues to monitor dementia at a national level.61 Even though dementia is not curable, many of its symptoms are now manageable; successful treatment can improve not only the patient’s prognosis, but also help the patient’s family cope with the disease. Nevertheless, prevention of dementia remains a public health priority and there is a growing interest in modifiable risk factors. An effective health policy is necessary for the prevention of dementia.20 In spite of the lack of effective treatments for dementia,6 a preventive approach may be possible by identifying high-risk individuals and addressing potentially modifiable risk factors.62–64 In particular, depression is a modifiable risk factor for dementia,62 and effective interventions for modifiable risk factors such as depression may reduce the risk of dementia.15 Some studies have shown that antidepressant drugs lead to memory enhancement and improved cognitive function.65 66 However, other studies have demonstrated that cognitive decline is still present after the successful treatment of depression.67 68 Further clinical research is needed to determine if the risk of developing dementia is affected by treating and/or preventing depression.

Limitations

There are several limitations of the present study that warrant discussion. First, the NHIS-NSC DB is a comprehensive db of diseases covered by the NHIS that reflects the entire population of Korea.69 However, due to the limitations associated with medical institutions’ claims to the NHIS, it was not possible to identify the root cause of diseases, including health characteristics and nutritional intake of individuals. Early-life depression was also found to be a risk factor for dementia, but we could not determine its association with dementia because of a lack of information about the severity of depression, personal lifestyle, family history and other factors in the NHIS-NSC DB. Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms linking early-life depression to dementia, large-scale population-based prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to analyse patients’ individual characteristics. Additionally, it was not possible to include the income variable as an ordinal number in the model. Since income is available as deciles in the NHIS-NSC DB, income levels were divided into three categories: low (0–3), middle (4–7) and high (8–10). It should be noted that, if the income variable is analysed as a continuous variable, the results might be different.

Second, diagnostic accuracy may be limited as the data were extracted according to patients’ primary diagnosis in the claims data.70 Since the diagnostic accuracy of health claims data is reported to be about 80%,71 it is possible that some of the diagnostic codes in the data were not fully accurate. To minimise this effect and improve the accuracy of the diagnosis, this study reviewed not only the primary, but also the secondary diagnosis codes.

Third, it was not possible to confirm whether clinical interventions for depression was effective in preventing dementia. Therefore, it is necessary to understand if modifiable risk factors such as clinical depression can be targeted to prevent dementia and improve cognition. In particular, our cohort consisted of patients with a diagnosis of depression in 2003, and later diagnoses of depression were not considered in this study. Further research with a different study design will be necessary to overcome this limitation.

Strengths

This study has a number of strengths. First, we analysed data from the NHIS-NSC DB, which contains a representative sample of individuals with dementia among the Korean population. The data pertains to one million people, and were collected by medical institutions over several years before being included in the DB. This implies that the findings of this study are representative of the status of dementia and depression in Korea.

Second, previous studies assessed depressive symptoms through self-surveys,36 37 interviews38 or self-tests.39 Therefore, the accuracy of the results can vary due to recall bias and/or a high false-positive rate of self-screening tests.72 Because the present study used ICD-10 diagnostic codes, we were able to obtain less biased results.

Third, this study used cohort data to determine the association between depression and dementia over a period of 12 years. Since most previous studies had short-term follow-up periods,28–30 long-term effects could not be examined. In contrast, the present study confirmed the causal relationship between depression and dementia by maintaining newly diagnosed depressive patients at a ratio of 1:1 in the PSM control group in 2003, without dropout during the 10-year follow-up period. Therefore, our findings not only had adequate statistical power but also were sufficiently robust.

Conclusions

Depression is an associated factor for dementia, especially among people who are 45–64 years old. Reasonable prevention and delay of dementia can be expected through an active intervention for mid-life depression.