Literature DB >> 33020007

Mortality and complication management after surgery for colorectal cancer depending on the DKG minimum amounts for hospital volume.

Johannes Diers1, Philip Baum2, Harald Matthes3, Christoph-Thomas Germer4, Armin Wiegering5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The German Cancer Society ("Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft"; DKG) certifies on a volunteer base colorectal cancer centers based on, among other things, minimum operative amounts (at least 30 oncological colon cancer resections and 20 oncological rectal cancer resections per year). In this work, nationwide hospital mortality and death after documented complications ('Failure to Rescue' = FtR) were evaluated depending on the fulfillment of the minimum amounts.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the nationwide hospital billing data (DRG data, 2012-2017). Categorization is based on the DKG minimum quantities (fully, partially or not fulfilled).
RESULTS: Of 287,227 patients analyzed, 56.5% were operated in centers that met the DKG minimum amounts. The overall hospital mortality rate was 5.0%. In centers which met the minimum quantities, it was significantly lower (4.3%) than in hospitals which partially (5.7%) or not (6.2%) met the minimum quantities. The risk-adjusted hospital mortality rate for patients in hospitals who meet the minimum amount was 20% lower (OR 0.80; 95% CI [0.74-0.87], p < 0.001). For complications, both surgical and non-surgical, there was an unadjusted and adjusted lower FtR in hospitals that met the minimum amounts (e.g. anastomotic leak: 11.2% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001; pulmonary artery embolism 21.3% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: There is a 1/3 lower mortality and FtR rate after surgery for a colon or rectal cancer in centers fulfilling the DKG minimum amounts. The presented data implicate that there is an urgent need for a nationwide centralization program.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal carcinoma; Complications; German cancer society; Hospital mortality; Morbidity; Surgery; ’Failure to rescue’

Year:  2020        PMID: 33020007     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

1.  Numbers Are Slightly Confusing.

Authors:  Armin Wiegering; Johanna Wagner; Philip Baum; Johannes Diers; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Ingo Klein
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation.

Authors:  Iona Pearson; Sue Blackwell; Rebecca Fish; Sarah Daniels; Malcolm West; Nanette Mutrie; P Kelly; Stephen Knight; Nicola S Fearnhead; Susan Moug
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Miriam Lillo-Felipe; Rebecka Ahl Hulme; Maximilian Peter Forssten; Gary A Bass; Yang Cao; Peter Matthiessen; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluoroangiography Is a Useful Tool in Reducing the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage Following Left Colectomy.

Authors:  Miriam Neddermeyer; Veit Kanngießer; Elisabeth Maurer; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  [Reality of care of colorectal cancer in the State of Brandenburg : With special consideration of the number of hospital cases and certification as a colorectal cancer center].

Authors:  Maik Sahm; Constanze Schneider; Stephan Gretschel; Rainer Kube; Andreas Becker; Marlis Günther; Andreas Loew; Kristoph Jahnke; Rene Mantke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 0.955

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.