| Literature DB >> 33019731 |
Carlos Boente1, Gonzalo Márquez1, Patricia Marín2, Emilio Romero1, Cristina Rodrigues3, Marco Antonio Guzmán1.
Abstract
The organic geochemistry of six oil samples from the offshore Block 17 (Lower Congo Basin, northwestern Angola) was studied by a combination of classical biomarker and extended diamondoid analyses to elucidate source rock facies, the extent of biodegradation, and thermal maturity. Based on molecular data, oils are interpreted as depicting a mixture of two pulses of hydrocarbon generation probably from the Bucomazi and Malembo formations. Geochemical results also gave evidence of mixing of a lacustrine siliciclastic-sourced oil charge and a second more terrestrially derived oil type in the samples analyzed. A single genetic oil family was identified through hierarchical cluster analysis; however, two groups of oils were identified on the basis of their biodegradation levels using the Peters/Moldowan scale. Lower and upper Malembo oils have a slight depletion and a notable absence of n-alkanes, suggesting PM levels of 1 and 2, respectively. Most molecular maturity parameters of the oil samples suggest a maturity level equivalent to the onset of the peak of the oil generative window.Entities:
Keywords: Block 17; Lower Congo Basin; PM biodegradation scale; QEDA analysis; mixed oils
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33019731 PMCID: PMC7579521 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1(a) Map showing the location of the study area in Africa; and (b) zoom revealing the location of the fields.
Figure 2Stratigraphic column in the Lower Congo Basin.
API gravities and SARA fractionating for sampled oils.
| Well | Reservoir | API | SAT | ARO | POL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horténsia | Upper Malembo | 20.2 | 60 | 26 | 14 |
| Dália | Upper Malembo | 21.4 | 61 | 25 | 14 |
| Rosa | Upper Malembo | 21.0 | 59 | 27 | 14 |
| Tulipa | Lower Malembo | 35.1 | 69 | 21 | 10 |
| Acácia | Lower Malembo | 35.8 | 70 | 21 | 9 |
| Orquídea | Lower Malembo | 36.3 | 69 | 22 | 9 |
SAT = saturates, ARO = aromatics, and POL = polar compounds.
Figure 3(a) and (b), respectively, m/z 99 ion chromatograms showing saturated hydrocarbon signals for typical oils from the lower and upper Malembo reservoirs.
Figure 4(a) and (b), respectively, m/z 177 and m/z 191 ion fragmentograms for the saturated fraction showing the triterpane distribution for a representative oil sample.
Geochemical indicators of source type and depositional environment for saturated and aromatic fractions in oils analyzed.
| Sample | %27ST | %28ST | %29ST | Ts/Tm | Ph/ | Pr/Ph | 29/30H | 31R/30H | 26/25T | 24/23T | ST/30H | DBT/P | Dia/ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horténsia | 35 | 32 | 33 | 1.38 | 4.63 | 1.42 | 0.57 | 0.24 | 1.14 | 0.76 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.53 |
| Dália | 36 | 31 | 33 | 1.33 | 4.20 | 1.51 | 0.53 | 0.23 | 1.12 | 0.75 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.51 |
| Rosa | 35 | 31 | 34 | 1.21 | 4.35 | 1.68 | 0.59 | 0.20 | 1.12 | 0.76 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.51 |
| Tulipa | 35 | 31 | 34 | 1.41 | 1.30 | 1.20 | 0.51 | 0.21 | 1.14 | 0.72 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 0.53 |
| Acácia | 35 | 32 | 33 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.30 | 0.58 | 0.22 | 1.13 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.52 |
| Orquídea | 36 | 31 | 33 | 1.27 | 1.19 | 1.43 | 0.55 | 0.22 | 1.15 | 0.74 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.52 |
24/23T = C24-cheilanthane/C23-cheilanthane; 29/30H = 30-norhopane/hopane; Pr/nC17 = pristane/n-heptadecane; DBT/P = dibenzothiophene/phenanthene; 31R/30H = homohopane 22R/hopane; %27ST = percentage of C27 regular steranes; 26/25T = C26-tricyclopolyprenanes/C25-tricyclopolyprenane; ST/30H = ratio of C29-regular steranes to C30-hopane; Ts/Tm = 18α(H)-22,29,30 trisnorneohopane/17α(H)-22,29,30 trisnorhopane; Pr/Ph = pristane/phytane; and Dia/ST = diasterane ratio or C27-diasteranes/C27-regular steranes.
Figure 5Example of m/z 217 ion chromatogram showing sterane distribution for a representative oil sample.
Some maturity-related molecular parameters for saturated and aromatic fractions in the oil samples.
| Sample | %ββ | Rc1 | TA | Rc2 | MPI-1 | Rc3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horténsia | 56 | 0.63 | 0.33 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
| Dália | 57 | 0.64 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.90 | 0.94 |
| Rosa | 55 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
| Tulipa | 56 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.65 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
| Acácia | 56 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
| Orquídea | 57 | 0.63 | 0.35 | 0.66 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
Notes: %ββ = ratio (%) of C29 isosteranes (20S + 20R) to C29 regular steranes (20S + 20R); %Rc1 = 0.01·(33.33 + 0.487·%20S); TA = C20 homologue to C20 plus C28 20R triaromatic steroid ratio; Rc2 = 0.37 + 0.7·TA; MPI-1 = 1.5·(2-MP + 3-MP)/(P + 1-MP + 9-MP); and Rc3 = 0.4 + 0.6 MPI-1.
Figure 6Representative m/z 231 ion chromatogram showing triaromatic steroids for the aromatic fraction of oil samples from the Block 17.
Figure 7Fingerprints of higher diamondoids by QEDA for Rosa (red in the graphics) and Tulipa (in blue color) oils (denoted by continuous lines) and respective hydropyrolysates generated from asphaltenes (dash lines). Note: The abundances of other polymantanes are relative to that of triamantane, which is set at one [35].