Literature DB >> 33017827

Capecitabine-Temozolomide in Advanced Grade 2 and Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Benefits of Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Significant 18FDG Uptake.

Vikas Ostwal1, Sandip Basu2, Prabhat Bhargava1, Minit Shah1, Rahul Vithalrao Parghane2, Sujay Srinivas1, Vikram Chaudhari3, Manish S Bhandare3, Shailesh V Shrikhande3, Anant Ramaswamy4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM) chemotherapy, alone or with concurrent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), has activity in advanced WHO grade 2 and grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of the CAPTEM in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 NENs and identify prognostic factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic grade 2 and grade 3 NENs, who were having baseline significant dual uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE/18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-CT scan and treated with CAPTEM chemotherapy between January 2014 and December 2019 at Tata Memorial Hospital, was conducted. The clinical variables and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 68 patients received the CAPTEM regimen, of whom 29 patients (43%) received CAPTEM alone and 39 patients (57%) received concurrent PRRT. The primary sites were pancreas in 32 (47%) and small intestine in 12 (18%) patients. Mean Ki-67 index was 12.6% (range: 3-50). Forty-five patients (65%) were treatment naïve. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical variables between patients treated with CAPTEM alone or with CAPTEM-PRRT. Both regimens were well tolerated. With a median follow-up of 22.1 months, the median PFS for the entire cohort was 27.5 months. There was no statistical difference in the median PFS between patients receiving CAPTEM alone or CAPTEM-PRRT (33.7 vs. 22 months; p = 0.199). A Ki-67 index of >5% predicted for inferior PFS on multivariate analysis (24 versus 73.8 months; p = 0.04; hazard ratio -3.77; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-13.26).
CONCLUSION: CAPTEM, alone or concurrent with PRRT, has a significant activity in grade 2 and grade 3 NENs with dual SSTR and 18FDG expression. A Ki-67 index >5% predicts strongly for inferior outcomes and should be further explored as a prognostic cutoff in grade 2 NENs. Early initiation of CAPTEM should be considered in this group of tumors with significant baseline 18FDG expression.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18FDG avidity; Capecitabine-temozolomide; Ki67 index; Neuroendocrine neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33017827     DOI: 10.1159/000511987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  9 in total

1.  Survival According to Therapy Regimen for Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Christine Koch; Cornelia Bambey; Natalie Filmann; Marc Stanke; Oliver Waidmann; Gabriele Husmann; Joerg Bojunga
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise.

Authors:  Mirco Bartolomei; Alfredo Berruti; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Diego Ferone; Secondo Lastoria; Giovanni Pappagallo; Ettore Seregni; Annibale Versari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Diletta Calabrò; Giulia Argalia; Valentina Ambrosini
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 4.  What Are the Place and Modalities of Surgical Management for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Samuel Frey; Eric Mirallié; Maëlle Le Bras; Nicolas Regenet
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Irene Ramos-Alvarez; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Elettra Merola; Andrea Michielan; Umberto Rozzanigo; Marco Erini; Sandro Sferrazza; Stefano Marcucci; Chiara Sartori; Chiara Trentin; Giovanni de Pretis; Franca Chierichetti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-02-27

Review 7.  Digestive Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Management and Future Directions.

Authors:  Anna Pellat; Anne Ségolène Cottereau; Lola-Jade Palmieri; Philippe Soyer; Ugo Marchese; Catherine Brezault; Romain Coriat
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Progresses and Future Approaches.

Authors:  Andrea Lania; Francesco Ferraù; Manila Rubino; Roberta Modica; Annamaria Colao; Antongiulio Faggiano
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  A Retrospective Analysis of the Correlation between Functional Imaging and Clinical Outcomes in Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs G3).

Authors:  Alice Laffi; Marzia Colandrea; Giuseppe Buonsanti; Samuele Frassoni; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Francesca Spada; Eleonora Pisa; Massimo Barberis; Manila Rubino; Chiara Maria Grana; Francesco Ceci; Nicola Fazio
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.