Literature DB >> 33017746

Selective removal of arsenic in water: A critical review.

Lakshika Weerasundara1, Yong-Sik Ok2, Jochen Bundschuh3.   

Abstract

Selective removal of arsenic (As) is the key challenge for any of As removal mechanisms as this not only increases the efficiency of removal of the main As species (neutral As(III) and As(V) hydroxyl-anions) but also allows for a significant reduction of waste as it does not co-remove other solutes. Selective removal has a number of benefits: it increases the capacity and lifetime of units while lowering the cost of the process. Therefore, a sustainable selective mitigation method should be considered concerning the economic resources available, the ability of infrastructure to sustain water treatment, and the options for reuse and/or safe disposal of treatment residuals. Several methods of selective As removal have been developed, such as precipitation, adsorption and modified iron and ligand exchange. The biggest challenge in selective removal of As is the presence of phosphate in water which is chemically comparable with As(V). There are two types of mechanisms involved with As removal: Coulombic or ion exchange; and Lewis acid-base interaction. Solution pH is one of the major controlling factors limiting removal efficiency since most of the above-mentioned methods depend on complexation through electrostatic effects. The different features of two different As species make the selective removal process more difficult, especially under natural conditions. Most of the selective As removal methods involve hydrated Fe(III) oxides through Lewis acid-base interaction. Microbiological methods have been studied recently for selective removal of As, and although there have been only a small number of studies, the method shows remarkable results and indicates positive prospects for the future.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Competitive ions; Cost reduction; Removal methods; Selective removal; Waste reduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33017746     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

1.  Urolithin A attenuates arsenic-induced gut barrier dysfunction.

Authors:  Sweta Ghosh; Mayukh Banerjee; Bodduluri Haribabu; Venkatakrishna Rao Jala
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Selective Extraction of Trace Arsenite Ions Using a Highly Porous Aluminum Oxide Membrane with Ordered Nanopores.

Authors:  Hilal Ahmad; Ahmed Rashid A Abdulwahab; Bon Heun Koo; Rais Ahmad Khan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-01-11

3.  Industrial Utilization of Capacitive Deionization Technology for the Removal of Fluoride and Toxic Metal Ions (As3+/5+ and Pb2+).

Authors:  Md Rabiul Islam; Soujit Sen Gupta; Sourav Kanti Jana; Thalappil Pradeep
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 4.  Natural Dietary Compounds in the Treatment of Arsenic Toxicity.

Authors:  Geir Bjørklund; Md Shiblur Rahaman; Mariia Shanaida; Roman Lysiuk; Petro Oliynyk; Larysa Lenchyk; Salvatore Chirumbolo; Christos T Chasapis; Massimiliano Peana
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Optimization of Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Amidoxime Resin Hosted by Mesoporous Silica.

Authors:  Doina Humelnicu; Maria Ignat; Maria Valentina Dinu; Ecaterina Stela Dragan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 6.  Significance of Shewanella Species for the Phytoavailability and Toxicity of Arsenic-A Review.

Authors:  Aminu Darma; Jianjun Yang; Peiman Zandi; Jin Liu; Katarzyna Możdżeń; Xing Xia; Ali Sani; Yihao Wang; Ewald Schnug
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.