| Literature DB >> 33017261 |
Emilie E Caron1, Michael G Reynolds2, Brandon C W Ralph1, Jonathan S A Carriere3, Derek Besner1, Daniel Smilek1.
Abstract
Rosenbaum, Mama, and Algom (2017) reported that participants who completed the Stroop task (i.e., name the hue of a color word when the hue and word meaning are congruent or incongruent) showed a smaller Stroop effect (i.e., the difference in response times between congruent and incongruent trials) when they performed the task standing than when sitting. We report five attempted replications (analyzed sample sizes: N = 108, N = 108, N = 98, N = 78, and N = 51, respectively) of Rosenbaum et al.'s findings, which were conducted in two institutions. All experiments yielded the standard Stroop effect, but we failed to detect any consistent effect of posture (sitting vs. standing) on the magnitude of the Stroop effect. Taken together, the results suggest that posture does not influence the magnitude of the Stroop effect to the extent that was previously suggested.Entities:
Keywords: Stroop task; active workstations; cognitive function; open data; preregistered; selective attention; standing desks
Year: 2020 PMID: 33017261 DOI: 10.1177/0956797620953842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Sci ISSN: 0956-7976