Xu Shi1,2, Andrew F Neuwald3, Xiao Wang1, Tian-Li Wang4, Leena Hilakivi-Clarke5, Robert Clarke5, Jianhua Xuan1. 1. Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, VA 22203, USA. 2. Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. 3. Institute for Genome Sciences and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. 5. Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, 801 16th Ave NE, Austin, MN 55912, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput RNA sequencing has revolutionized the scope and depth of transcriptome analysis. Accurate reconstruction of a phenotype-specific transcriptome is challenging due to the noise and variability of RNA-seq data. This requires computational identification of transcripts from multiple samples of the same phenotype, given the underlying consensus transcript structure. RESULTS: We present a Bayesian method, integrated assembly of phenotype-specific transcripts (IntAPT), that identifies phenotype-specific isoforms from multiple RNA-seq profiles. IntAPT features a novel two-layer Bayesian model to capture the presence of isoforms at the group layer and to quantify the abundance of isoforms at the sample layer. A spike-and-slab prior is used to model the isoform expression and to enforce the sparsity of expressed isoforms. Dependencies between the existence of isoforms and their expression are modeled explicitly to facilitate parameter estimation. Model parameters are estimated iteratively using Gibbs sampling to infer the joint posterior distribution, from which the presence and abundance of isoforms can reliably be determined. Studies using both simulations and real datasets show that IntAPT consistently outperforms existing methods for the IntAPT. Experimental results demonstrate that, despite sequencing errors, IntAPT exhibits a robust performance among multiple samples, resulting in notably improved identification of expressed isoforms of low abundance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The IntAPT package is available at http://github.com/henryxushi/IntAPT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: High-throughput RNA sequencing has revolutionized the scope and depth of transcriptome analysis. Accurate reconstruction of a phenotype-specific transcriptome is challenging due to the noise and variability of RNA-seq data. This requires computational identification of transcripts from multiple samples of the same phenotype, given the underlying consensus transcript structure. RESULTS: We present a Bayesian method, integrated assembly of phenotype-specific transcripts (IntAPT), that identifies phenotype-specific isoforms from multiple RNA-seq profiles. IntAPT features a novel two-layer Bayesian model to capture the presence of isoforms at the group layer and to quantify the abundance of isoforms at the sample layer. A spike-and-slab prior is used to model the isoform expression and to enforce the sparsity of expressed isoforms. Dependencies between the existence of isoforms and their expression are modeled explicitly to facilitate parameter estimation. Model parameters are estimated iteratively using Gibbs sampling to infer the joint posterior distribution, from which the presence and abundance of isoforms can reliably be determined. Studies using both simulations and real datasets show that IntAPT consistently outperforms existing methods for the IntAPT. Experimental results demonstrate that, despite sequencing errors, IntAPT exhibits a robust performance among multiple samples, resulting in notably improved identification of expressed isoforms of low abundance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The IntAPT package is available at http://github.com/henryxushi/IntAPT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Lauren M McIntyre; Kenneth K Lopiano; Alison M Morse; Victor Amin; Ann L Oberg; Linda J Young; Sergey V Nuzhdin Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Kate R Rosenbloom; Joel Armstrong; Galt P Barber; Jonathan Casper; Hiram Clawson; Mark Diekhans; Timothy R Dreszer; Pauline A Fujita; Luvina Guruvadoo; Maximilian Haeussler; Rachel A Harte; Steve Heitner; Glenn Hickey; Angie S Hinrichs; Robert Hubley; Donna Karolchik; Katrina Learned; Brian T Lee; Chin H Li; Karen H Miga; Ngan Nguyen; Benedict Paten; Brian J Raney; Arian F A Smit; Matthew L Speir; Ann S Zweig; David Haussler; Robert M Kuhn; W James Kent Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 19.160
Authors: Kim D Pruitt; Garth R Brown; Susan M Hiatt; Françoise Thibaud-Nissen; Alexander Astashyn; Olga Ermolaeva; Catherine M Farrell; Jennifer Hart; Melissa J Landrum; Kelly M McGarvey; Michael R Murphy; Nuala A O'Leary; Shashikant Pujar; Bhanu Rajput; Sanjida H Rangwala; Lillian D Riddick; Andrei Shkeda; Hanzhen Sun; Pamela Tamez; Raymond E Tully; Craig Wallin; David Webb; Janet Weber; Wendy Wu; Michael DiCuccio; Paul Kitts; Donna R Maglott; Terence D Murphy; James M Ostell Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sharmistha Pal; Yingtao Bi; Luke Macyszyn; Louise C Showe; Donald M O'Rourke; Ramana V Davuluri Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Andrew Yates; Wasiu Akanni; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Konstantinos Billis; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Carla Cummins; Peter Clapham; Stephen Fitzgerald; Laurent Gil; Carlos García Girón; Leo Gordon; Thibaut Hourlier; Sarah E Hunt; Sophie H Janacek; Nathan Johnson; Thomas Juettemann; Stephen Keenan; Ilias Lavidas; Fergal J Martin; Thomas Maurel; William McLaren; Daniel N Murphy; Rishi Nag; Michael Nuhn; Anne Parker; Mateus Patricio; Miguel Pignatelli; Matthew Rahtz; Harpreet Singh Riat; Daniel Sheppard; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Alessandro Vullo; Steven P Wilder; Amonida Zadissa; Ewan Birney; Jennifer Harrow; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Giulietta Spudich; Stephen J Trevanion; Fiona Cunningham; Bronwen L Aken; Daniel R Zerbino; Paul Flicek Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sarah Djebali; Carrie A Davis; Angelika Merkel; Alex Dobin; Timo Lassmann; Ali Mortazavi; Andrea Tanzer; Julien Lagarde; Wei Lin; Felix Schlesinger; Chenghai Xue; Georgi K Marinov; Jainab Khatun; Brian A Williams; Chris Zaleski; Joel Rozowsky; Maik Röder; Felix Kokocinski; Rehab F Abdelhamid; Tyler Alioto; Igor Antoshechkin; Michael T Baer; Nadav S Bar; Philippe Batut; Kimberly Bell; Ian Bell; Sudipto Chakrabortty; Xian Chen; Jacqueline Chrast; Joao Curado; Thomas Derrien; Jorg Drenkow; Erica Dumais; Jacqueline Dumais; Radha Duttagupta; Emilie Falconnet; Meagan Fastuca; Kata Fejes-Toth; Pedro Ferreira; Sylvain Foissac; Melissa J Fullwood; Hui Gao; David Gonzalez; Assaf Gordon; Harsha Gunawardena; Cedric Howald; Sonali Jha; Rory Johnson; Philipp Kapranov; Brandon King; Colin Kingswood; Oscar J Luo; Eddie Park; Kimberly Persaud; Jonathan B Preall; Paolo Ribeca; Brian Risk; Daniel Robyr; Michael Sammeth; Lorian Schaffer; Lei-Hoon See; Atif Shahab; Jorgen Skancke; Ana Maria Suzuki; Hazuki Takahashi; Hagen Tilgner; Diane Trout; Nathalie Walters; Huaien Wang; John Wrobel; Yanbao Yu; Xiaoan Ruan; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Jennifer Harrow; Mark Gerstein; Tim Hubbard; Alexandre Reymond; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Gregory Hannon; Morgan C Giddings; Yijun Ruan; Barbara Wold; Piero Carninci; Roderic Guigó; Thomas R Gingeras Journal: Nature Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 49.962