Literature DB >> 33016881

Normal values of thermodilution-derived absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance in humans.

Stephane Fournier1, Daniëlle C J Keulards, Marcel van 't Veer, Iginio Colaiori, Giuseppe Di Gioia, Frederik M Zimmermann, Takuya Mizukami, Sakura Nagumo, Monika Kodeboina, Mohamed El Farissi, Jo M Zelis, Jeroen Sonck, Carlos Collet, Nico H J Pijls, Bernard De Bruyne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Absolute hyperaemic coronary blood flow (Q, in mL/min) and resistance (R, in Wood units [WU]) can be measured invasively by continuous thermodilution. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess normal reference values of Q and R.
METHODS: In 177 arteries (69 patients: 25 controls, i.e., without identifiable coronary atherosclerosis; 44 patients with mild, non-obstructive atherosclerosis), thermodilution-derived hyperaemic Q and total, epicardial, and microvascular absolute resistances (Rtot, Repi, and Rmicro) were measured. In 20 controls and 29 patients, measurements were obtained in all three major coronary arteries, thus allowing calculations of Q and R for the whole heart. In 15 controls (41 vessels) and 25 patients (71 vessels), vessel-specific myocardial mass was derived from coronary computed tomography angiography.
RESULTS: Whole heart hyperaemic Q tended to be higher in controls compared to patients (668±185 vs 582±138 mL/min, p=0.068). In the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), hyperaemic Q was significantly higher (293±102 mL/min versus 228±71 mL/min, p=0.004) in controls than in patients. This was driven mainly by a difference in Repi (43±23 vs 83±41 WU, p=0.048), without significant differences in Rmicro. After adjustment for vessel-specific myocardial mass, hyperaemic Q was similar in the three vascular territories (5.9±1.9, 4.9±1.7, and 5.3±2.1 mL/min/g, p=0.44, in the LAD, left circumflex and right coronary artery, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The present report provides reference values of absolute coronary hyperaemic Q and R. Q was homogeneously distributed in the three major myocardial territories but the large ranges of observed hyperaemic values of flow and of microvascular resistance preclude their clinical use for inter-patient comparison.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33016881     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  7 in total

1.  Angina with coronary microvascular dysfunction and its physiological assessment: a review with cases.

Authors:  Pitt O Lim
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  The Complementary Value of Absolute Coronary Flow in the Assessment of Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease (the COMPAC-Flow Study).

Authors:  Louise Aubiniere-Robb; Rebecca Gosling; Daniel J Taylor; Tom Newman; D Rodney; Hose Ian Halliday; Patricia V Lawford; Andrew J Narracott; Julian P Gunn; Paul D Morris
Journal:  Nat Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 3.  The Role of Coronary Physiology in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Federico Marin; Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Rafail A Kotronias; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian P Banning; Giovanni Luigi De Maria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Thermodilution-Based Invasive Assessment of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow and Microvascular Resistance: Quantification of Microvascular (Dys)Function?

Authors:  Daniëlle C J Keulards; Mohamed El Farissi; Pim A L Tonino; Koen Teeuwen; Pieter-Jan Vlaar; Eduard van Hagen; Inge F Wijnbergen; Annemiek de Vos; Guus R G Brueren; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function.

Authors:  Fabio Mangiacapra; Michele Mattia Viscusi; Giuseppe Verolino; Luca Paolucci; Annunziata Nusca; Rosetta Melfi; Gian Paolo Ussia; Francesco Grigioni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Microcirculatory Function in Nonhypertrophic and Hypertrophic Myocardium in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Muhammad Sabbah; Niels Thue Olsen; Mikko Minkkinen; Lene Holmvang; Hans-Henrik Tilsted; Frants Pedersen; Francis R Joshi; Kiril Ahtarovski; Rikke Sørensen; Jesper James Linde; Lars Søndergaard; Nico Pijls; Jacob Lønborg; Thomas Engstrøm
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 7.  Invasive evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Alejandro Travieso; Adrian Jeronimo-Baza; Daniel Faria; Asad Shabbir; Hernan Mejia-Rentería; Javier Escaned
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.872

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.