S B Griffin1,2, L J Ross3,2, M J Burstow4,5, B Desbrow2, M A Palmer1,2. 1. Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Logan Hospital, Loganholme, QLD, Australia. 2. School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. 3. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 4. Division of Surgery, Logan Hospital, Loganholme, QLD, Australia. 5. School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elective surgery in obese adults carries a higher risk of post-operative infection and prolonged hospital stays, and surgeons may postpone surgery for patients with obesity until they lose weight. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of a dietitian-led very low calorie diet (VLCD)-based model of care with respect to achieving weight loss for obese patients prior to surgery. METHODS: This mixed-methods study included a medical chart audit of patients referred to a VLCD-based model over 23 months, as well as a survey of recently treated patients and surgeons who utilised the model. Preoperative weight loss targets were set by surgeons, and the dietitian prescribed individualised VLCD-based treatment. Efficacy was determined as weight loss considered sufficient for surgery, clinical safety of VLCD-based treatment, feasibility, and stakeholder value. Pre/post-intervention differences in clinical measures were explored by paired t-test or Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Data on seventy-eight eligible patients [mean (SD) 45 (13) years, 90% female, body mass index 44.3 (6.2) kg m-2 ] demonstrated significant mean (SD) weight loss of 7.4% (5.3%) body weight (P < 0.05). Most patients (70%, n = 50/71) achieved sufficient weight loss to proceed to surgery. Fifty-six per cent of patients reported mild side effects (n = 43/77) and none led to treatment cessation. Surgeons reported VLCD-based treatment made operations easier (83%, n = 10/12) and shorter (75%, n = 9/12) and all recommended the model of care. All surveyed patients (n = 24) reported satisfaction with their VLCD-based model experience. CONCLUSIONS: A dietitian-led VLCD-based model achieved sufficient weight loss to facilitate elective surgery for most patients. The approach was feasible, highly valued by patients and surgeons, and resulted in perceived surgical benefits.
BACKGROUND: Elective surgery in obese adults carries a higher risk of post-operative infection and prolonged hospital stays, and surgeons may postpone surgery for patients with obesity until they lose weight. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of a dietitian-led very low calorie diet (VLCD)-based model of care with respect to achieving weight loss for obese patients prior to surgery. METHODS: This mixed-methods study included a medical chart audit of patients referred to a VLCD-based model over 23 months, as well as a survey of recently treated patients and surgeons who utilised the model. Preoperative weight loss targets were set by surgeons, and the dietitian prescribed individualised VLCD-based treatment. Efficacy was determined as weight loss considered sufficient for surgery, clinical safety of VLCD-based treatment, feasibility, and stakeholder value. Pre/post-intervention differences in clinical measures were explored by paired t-test or Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Data on seventy-eight eligible patients [mean (SD) 45 (13) years, 90% female, body mass index 44.3 (6.2) kg m-2 ] demonstrated significant mean (SD) weight loss of 7.4% (5.3%) body weight (P < 0.05). Most patients (70%, n = 50/71) achieved sufficient weight loss to proceed to surgery. Fifty-six per cent of patients reported mild side effects (n = 43/77) and none led to treatment cessation. Surgeons reported VLCD-based treatment made operations easier (83%, n = 10/12) and shorter (75%, n = 9/12) and all recommended the model of care. All surveyed patients (n = 24) reported satisfaction with their VLCD-based model experience. CONCLUSIONS: A dietitian-led VLCD-based model achieved sufficient weight loss to facilitate elective surgery for most patients. The approach was feasible, highly valued by patients and surgeons, and resulted in perceived surgical benefits.